Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fairness, Rights, and Harm in Early Childhood: A 2-Year Investigation of Moral Family Conflict

Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study examined polyadic family conflicts (i.e., involving three or more active members) comprising moral issues (i.e., fairness, rights, harm) across a 2-year period in early childhood. Moral conflicts were coded for initiating parties, topic, and use of power strategies. Thirty-nine families participated in six 90-min naturalistic observations when children were 2- and 4-years of age at T1 and again two years later (T2). Findings indicated the majority of polyadic family conflict topics concerned three moral issues, specifically, conflicts pertaining to issues of fairness and harm occurred significantly more than conflicts about rights. Disputes about fairness were more common at T1 than T2, whereas those about rights were more common at T2 than T1. Further, children were more likely to initiate disputes over fairness and harm, whereas parents frequently initiated conflicts about rights. Lastly, in terms of power strategies, coercion was used most frequently across moral topics. Findings expand the conflict literature by investigating the family as an integrated unit and examining the involvement of its members in young children’s development of morality.

Highlights

  • Moral polyadic conflicts were studied using a comprehensive observational and longitudinal dataset.

  • Conflicts about fairness and harm occur more than rights, but also vary as a function of time.

  • Family members differentially initiate and respond to conflict depending on the moral conflict context.

  • The family context is a training ground for learning about moral conflicts involving multiple active actors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abuhatoum, S., & Howe, N. (2013). Power in sibling conflict during early and middle childhood. Social Development, 22(4), 738–754. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abuhatoum, S., Della Porta, S., Howe, N., & DeHart, G. (2020). A longitudinal examination of power in sibling and friend conflict. Social Development, 29(3), 903–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardila-Rey, A., Killen, M., & Brenick, A. (2009). Moral reasoning in violent contexts: Displaced and non-displaced Colombian children’s evaluations of moral transgressions, retaliation, and reconciliation. Social Development, 18(1), 181–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00483.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, K. N. (2019). Moving beyond the Dyad in Research on Family Conflict. Human Development, 63(1), 78–84. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownell, C. A., Iesue, S. S., Nichols, S. R., & Svetlova, M. (2013). Mine or yours? Development of sharing in toddlers in relation to ownership understanding. Child Development, 84(3), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, S., & Killen, M. (2015). Children’s evaluations of resource allocation in the context of group norms. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 554–563. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidov, M., Zahn-Waxler, C., Roth-Hanania, R., & Knafo, A. (2013). Concern for others in the first year of life: Theory, evidence, and avenues for research. Child Development Perspectives, 7(2), 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHart, G. B. (1999). Conflict and averted conflict in preschoolers’ interactions with siblings and friends. In W. A. Collins & B. Laursen (Eds.), Minnesota symposia on child psychology: vol. 30. Relationships as developmental contexts (pp. 281–303). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Della Porta, S., & Howe, N. (2012). Assessing mothers’ and children’s perceptions of power through personal, conventional, and prudential conflict situations. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 58(4), 507–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, S. & Howe, N. (2017). Siblings’ power and influence in polyadic family conflict during early childhood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2017(15), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, S., Howe, N., & Persram, R. J. (2019). Parents’ and children’s power effectiveness during polyadic family conflict: Process and outcome. Social Development, 28(1), 152–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, M. A., Recchia, H. E., Estabrook, R., Howe, N., Petitclerc, A., Burns, J. L., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2019). Differentiating typical from atypical perpetration of sibling-directed aggression during the preschool years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 60(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (2014). Moral development in early childhood, and social interaction in the family. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (2nd ed., pp. 135–159). Psychology Press.

  • Fasig, L. G. (2000). Toddlers’ understanding of ownership: Implications for self-concept development. Social Development, 9(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Research Center for Group Dynamics Institute of Social Research.

  • Hamlin, J. K. (2013). Moral judgment and action in preverbal infants and toddlers: Evidence for an innate moral core. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 186–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412470687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, D. F., & Ross, H. S. (1982). The social nature of early conflict. Child Development, 53(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129642.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helwig, C. C., Ruck, M. D., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2014). Rights, civil liberties, and democracy. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana, (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 46–69. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203581957.ch3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Helwig, C. C., To, S., Wang, Q., Liu, C., & Yang, S. (2014). Judgments and reasoning about parental discipline involving induction and psychological control in China and Canada. Child Development, 85(3), 1150–1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12183.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helwig, C. C., Turiel, E. (2017). The psychology of children’s rights. In M. Ruck, M. Peterson-Badali, M. Freeman (Eds.), The handbook of children’s rights: global and multidisciplinary perspectives (pp. 132–148). Taylor and Francis.

  • Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., Gangl, K., Hartner-Tiefenthaler, M., & Kirchler, E. (2017). Authorities’ coercive and legitimate power: the impact on cognitions underlying cooperation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(5), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., Ross, H. S., & Recchia, H. (2011). Sibling relations in early and middle childhood. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of childhood social development (2nd ed., pp. 356–372). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Jambon, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2014). Moral complexity in middle childhood: Children’s evaluations of necessary harm. Developmental Psychology, 50(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032992.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In R. M. Lerner & M. Lamb (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (Vol. 3, 7th ed., pp. 701–749). Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Laible, D. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2000). Mother–child discourse, attachment security, shared positive affect, and early conscience development. Child Development, 71(5), 1424–1440. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00237.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laible, D. J., & Thompson, R. A. (2002). Mother‐child conflict in the toddler years: lessons in emotion, morality, and relationships. Child Development, 73(4), 1187–1203. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L., & Turiel, E. (2009). Capturing the complexity of moral development and education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(3), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2009.01065.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nucci, L. P., & Weber, E. K. (1995). Social interactions in the home and the development of young children’s conceptions of the personal. Child Development, 66(5), 1438–1452.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Persram, R. J., Howe, N., Della Porta, S., & Ross, H. S. (2017). Family members’ helping behavior: Alliance formations during naturalistic polyadic conflicts. Infant and Child Development, 26, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persram, R. J., Scirocco, A., Della Porta, S., & Howe, N. (2019b). Moving beyond the dyad: broadening our understanding of family conflict. Human Development, 63(1), 38–70. https://doi.org/10.1159/000501880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persram, R. J., Della Porta, S., Scirocco, A., Howe, N., & Ross, H. S. (2019a). A two-year longitudinal study of naturalistic parent-child-originated and sibling-originated polyadic conflicts. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 65(4), 377–401. https://doi.org/10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.65.4.0377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recchia, H. E., & Howe, N. (2010). When do siblings compromise? Associations with children’s descriptions of conflict issues, culpability, and emotions. Social Development, 19(4), 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2009.00567.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Recchia, H., Wainryb, C., & Pasupathi, M. (2013). ‘Two for flinching’: children’s and adolescents’ narrative accounts of harming their friends and siblings. Child Development, 84(4), 1459–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12059.

  • Ross, H. S. (1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. S. (2013). Effects of ownership rights on conflicts between toddler peers. Infancy, 18(2), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00121.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. S., Friedman, O., & Field, A. (2015). Toddlers assert and acknowledge ownership rights. Social Development, 24(2), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. S., Filyer, R. E., Lollis, S. P., Perlman, M., & Martin, J. L. (1994). Administering justice in the family. Journal of Family Psychology, 8(3), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.8.3.254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossano, F., Rakoczy, H., & Tomasello, M. (2011). Young children’s understanding of violations of property rights. Cognition, 121(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.06.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruck, M. D., Abramovitch, R., & Keating, D. P. (1998). Children’s and adolescents’ understanding of rights: Balancing nurturance and self-determination. Child Development, 69(2), 404–417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1132174.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scirocco, A., Recchia, H., Wainryb, C., & Pasupathi, M. (2018). Social Development, 27(4), 910–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12303

  • Sigelman, C. K., & Waitzman, K. A. (1991). The development of distributive justice orientations: Contextual influences on children’s resource allocations. Child Development, 62(6), 1367–1378. https://doi.org/10.2307/1130812.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (1984). Toddlers’ social interactions regarding moral and social transgressions. Child Development, 55(5), 1767–1776. https://doi.org/10.2307/1129924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G., Rote, W. M., Jambon, M., Tasopoulos-Chan, M., Villalobos, M., & Comer, J. (2012). Developmental changes and individual differences in young children’s moral judgments. Child Development, 83(2), 683–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01714.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen, & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119-153). Lawrence Erlbaum.

  • Smetana, J. G. (2013). Moral development: the social domain theory view. In P. Zelazo (Ed.), Oxford handbook of developmental psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 832–866). Oxford University Press.

  • Sorkhabi, N. (2010). Sources of parent-adolescent conflict: content and form of parenting. Social Behaviour and Personality, 38(6), 761–782. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2010.38.6.761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.

  • Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: social development, context, and conflict. Cambridge University Press.

  • Vera-Estay, E., Seni, A. G., Champagne, C. & Beauchamp, M. H. (2016). All for One: Contributions of Age, Socioeconomic Factors, Executive Functioning, and Social Cognition to Moral Reasoning in Childhood. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00227.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wainryb, C., & Recchia, H. (2017). Mother-child conversations about children’s moral wrongdoing: A constructivist perspective on moral socialization. In N. Budwig, E. Turiel, & P. D. Zelazo (Eds.), New perspectives on human development (pp. 182–208). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316282755.012

  • Wainryb, C., & Recchia, H. E. (2014). Talking about right and wrong: parent-child conversations as contexts for moral development. Cambridge University Press.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support received from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (doctoral fellowships to the first and second authors, and strategic research grants to the fourth and fifth authors). The fourth author also recognizes support received from the Concordia University Research Chair in Early Childhood Development and Education. We would like to thank the children and families who participated in this study. Additionally, we would like to thank Alicia Fong, Jade Elyssia Pare, and Natasha Schleifer for their research assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Howe.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scirocco, A., Persram, R.J., Della Porta, S. et al. Fairness, Rights, and Harm in Early Childhood: A 2-Year Investigation of Moral Family Conflict. J Child Fam Stud 32, 2878–2888 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02201-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-021-02201-0

Keywords

Navigation