Abstract
In this paper, we examined whether high family SES had a net benefit on 12–21 years old youth’s adjustment in the absence of parent–child genetic connection. We compared 137 female youth who were adopted from China into the United States, with 90 non-adopted female youth who lived in China, as well as 69 non-adopted American female youth of diverse racial backgrounds. All three groups were from high SES families. The participants completed the third edition of the Behavioral Assessment for Children-Self Report of Personality (BASC-3-SRP). Eight subscales from the BASC-3-SRP that demonstrated cross-cultural measurement equivalence were compared across the three groups. We found that of the eight subscales, the adopted youth outperformed the two non-adopted groups on seven, but did not underperform on any; while the two non-adopted groups did not perform differently from each other on five subscales but performed differently on the other three. These results offered evidence that high SES has a net effect on youth adjustment even in the absence of parent–child genetic connection.
Highlights
-
Whether high family SES has a net effect on youth’s adjustment is poorly understood.
-
Adopted youth’s families had higher family income than non-adopted youth’s families.
-
Adopted Chinese youth had better adjustment than non-adopted Chinese youth.
-
Adopted Chinese youth had better adjustment than non-adopted American youth.
-
Even without a genetic link, high family SES positively shaped youth’s adjustment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyle, M. (1994). The psychology of social class. London and New York: Routledge.
Bimmel, N., Juffer, F., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2003). Problem behavior of internationally adopted adolescents: a review and meta-analysis. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 11(2), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/00023727-200303000-00002.
Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233.
Charney, E. (2017). Genes, behavior, and behavior genetics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 8(1–2), e1405.
Chen, E., & Paterson, L. Q. (2006). Neighborhood, family, and subjective socioeconomic status: how do they relate to adolescent health? Health Psychology, 25, 704–714. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.704.
China Center for Children’s Welfare and Adoption (2017). Measures for registration of adoption of children by foreigners in the People’s Republic of China. http://cccwaen.mca.gov.cn/article/IntercountryAdoption/b/b/201404/20140400625818.shtml.
China Power Team (2019). How well-off is China’s middle class? China Power. https://chinapower.csis.org/china-middle-class/.
Cohen, N. J., Lojkasek, M., Zadeh, Z. Y., Pugliese, M., & Kiefer, H. (2008). Children adopted from China: a prospective study of their growth and development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01853.x.
Conger, R. D., Conger, K. J., & Martin, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual development. Journal of Marriage and Family, 72(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00725.x.
Dahl, R. E. (2004). Adolescent brain development: a period of vulnerabilities and opportunities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1308.001.
Devenish, B., Hooley, M., & Mellor, D. (2017). The pathways between socioeconomic status and adolescent outcomes: a systematic review. American Journal of Community Psychology, 59(1/2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12115.
Dick, D. M., Adkins, A. E., & Kuo, S. I. (2016). Genetic influences on adolescent behavior. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 70, 198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.007.
Duncan, G. J. & Magnuson, K. (2003). Off with Hollingshead: socioeconomic resources, parenting, and child development. In M. Bornstein & R. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 83–106). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Duyme, M., Dumaret, A., & Tomkiewicz, S. (1999). How can we boost IQs of “dull children”?: a late adoption study. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(15), 8790–8794. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.15.8790.
Gibson, K. (2009). Differential parental investment in families with both adopted and genetic children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.01.001.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., Guerin, D. W., & Parramore, M. M. (2003). Socioeconomic status in children’s development and family environment: Infancy through adolescence. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 189–207). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Hackman, D. A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003.
Hamilton, L., Cheng, S., & Powell, B. (2007). Adoptive parents, adaptive parents: evaluation the importance of biological ties for parental investment. American Sociological Review, 72, 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240707200610.
Hoff, E., Laursen, B., & Tardif, T. (2002). Socioeconomic status and parenting. In M. H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting (pp. 231–252). Mahwah, New Jersey, London, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hawk, B., & McCall, R. B. (2010). CBCL behavior problems of post-institutionalized international adoptees. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(2), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-010-0068-x.
Hudson, C. G. (2005). Socioeconomic status and mental illness: Tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.3.
Johnson, K. A. (2004). Wanting a daughter, needing a son: abandonment, adoption, and orphanage care in China. St. Paul, MN: Yeong and Yeong Book Company.
Johnson, W., McGue, M., & Iacono, W. G. (2007). Socioeconomic status and school grades: placing their association in broader context in a sample of biological and adoptive families. Intelligence, 35(6), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2006.09.006.
Juffer, F., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2005). Behavior problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees: a meta-analysis. JAMA, 293(20), 2501–2015. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.20.2501.
Kamphaus, R. W., & Reynolds, C. R. (2015). Behavior assessment system for children. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
Kroupina, M. G., Fuglestad, A. J., Iverson, S. L., Himes, J. H., Mason, P. W., Gunnar, M. R., & Johnson, D. E. (2012). Adoption as an intervention for institutionally reared children: HPA functioning and developmental status. Infant Behavior & Development, 35(4), 829–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2012.07.011.
Leo, Y., Fleury, E., Alvarez-Hamelin, J. I., Sarraute, C., & Karsai, M. (2016). Socioeconomic correlations and stratification in social-communication networks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 13. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2016.0598.
Lerner, R. M. (2003). What are SES effects effects of?: a developmental systems perspective. In M. H. Bornstein & R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child development (pp. 231–255). Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Letourneau, N. L., Duffett-Leger, L., Levac, L., Watson, B., & Young-Morris, C. (2013). Socioeconomic status and child development: a meta-analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 21(3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1063426611421007.
Levine Coley, R., Sims, J., Dearing, E., & Spielvogel, B. (2018). Locating economic risks for adolescent mental and behavioral health: Poverty and affluence in families, neighborhoods, and schools. Child Development, 89(2), 360–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12771.
Lindblad, F., Hjern, A., & Vinnerljung, B. (2003). Intercountry adopted children as young adults: a Swedish cohort study. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 73(2), 190–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0002-9432.73.2.19.
McGue, M., Rustichini, A., & Iacono, W. G. (2017). Cognitive, non-cognitive and family background contributions to college attainment: a behavioral genetic perspective. Journal of Personality, 85(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12230.
McLaughlin, K. A., Costello, E. J., Leblanc, W., Sampson, N. A., & Kessler, R. C. (2012). Socioeconomic status and adolescent mental disorders. American Journal of Public Health, 102(9), 1742–1750. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2011.300477.
McLeod, J. D., & Shanahan, M. J. (1993). Poverty, parenting, and children’s mental health. American Sociological Review, 58(3), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095905.
Miller, L., & Hendrie, N. W. (2000). Health of children adopted from China. Pediatrics, 105(6), E76 https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.105.6.e76.
Plug, E., & Vijverberg, W. (2003). Schooling, family background, and adoption: is it nature or is it nurture? Journal of Political Economy, 111(3), 611–641. https://doi.org/10.1086/374185.
Plug, E., & Vijverberg, W. (2005). Does family income matter for schooling outcomes? Using adoption as a natural experiment. The Economic Journal, 115, 879–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01023.x.
Putnam, R. D. (2003). Community-based social capital and educational performance. In D. Ravitch & J. P. Viteritti (Eds.), Making good citizens: education and civil society (pp. 58–95). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Reiss, F. (2013). Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Social Science and Medicine, 90, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.026.
Roubinov, D. S., & Boyce, W. T. (2017). Parenting and SES: relative values or enduring principles? Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 162–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.001.
Sacerdote, B. (2002). The nature and nurture of economic outcomes. American Economic Review, 92(2), 344–348. https://doi.org/10.3386/w7949.
Sacerdote, B. (2007). How large are the effects from changes in family environment? A study of Korean American adoptees. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(1), 119–157. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.1.119.
Scheeren, L., Das, M., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2017). Intergenerational transmission of educational attainment in adoptive families in the Netherlands. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 48, 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2016.12.002.
September, S. J., Rich, E. G., & Roman, N. V. (2016). The role of parenting styles and socio-economic status in parents’ knowledge of child development. Early Child Development and Care, 186(7), 1060–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2015.1076399.
Stevenson, J., Graham, P., Fredman, G., & Mcloughli, V. (1987). A twin study of genetic influences on reading and spelling ability and disability. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(2), 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1987.tb00207.x.
Tan, T. X. (2018). Model minority of a different kind? Academic competence and behavioral health of Chinese children adopted by White parents. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 9(3), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1037/aap0000106.
Tan, T. X., & Camras, L. A. (2011). Social skills of adopted Chinese girls at home and in school: parent and teacher Ratings. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(10), 1813–1821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.05.006.
Tan, T. X., Camras, L. A., Zhang, M. H., Deng, H. H., & Lu, Z. H. (2012). Family stress, parenting styles and preschool-age adopted Chinese girls’ behavioral adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.04.002.
Tan, T. X., Kim, E. S., Baggerly, J., Mahoney, E. E., & Rice, J. (2017). Beyond adoption status: post-adoptive parental involvement and children’s reading and math performance from kindergarten to first grade. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 87(3), 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000216.
Tan, T. X., Major, D., Marn, T., Na, E., & Jackson, A. L. (2015). Adopted children’s country of origin and post-adoption parent-child relationship quality: Findings from the United States National Survey of Adoption Parents (NSAP). Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 117–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.12.001.
Tan, T. X., & Marfo, K. (2016). Pre-adoption adversity and behavior problems in adopted Chinese children: a longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 42, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.11.006.
Tan, T. X., Marfo, K., & Dedrick, R. F. (2010). Early developmental and psychosocial risks and longitudinal behavioral adjustment outcomes for preschool-age girls adopted from China. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 306–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2010.04.002.
Tan, T. X., Yi, Z., Kim, E., Li, Z., & Cheng, K. (2020). Linguistic equivalence, construct validity, but lack measurement invariance: an illustration of challenges in cross-cultural research on adolescent adjustment. Cross-Cultural Research, 54(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397120914875.
Trzaskowski, M., Harlaar, N., Arden, R., Krapohl, E., Rimfeld, K., McMillan, A., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2014). Genetic influence on family socioeconomic status and children’s intelligence. Intelligence, 42, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.11.002.
US Census Bureau. (2006). CPS 2006 annual social and economic supplement. https://web.archive.org/web/20060901183420/http://pubdb3.census.gov:80/macro/032006/faminc/toc.htm.
Vandivere, S., Malm, K., & Radel, L. (2009). Adoption USA: a chartbook based on the 2007 National Survey of Adoptive Parents. http://aspe.hhs.gov/hsp/09/NSAP/chartbook/index.cfm.
van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Juffer, F. (2006). The Emanuel Miller Memorial Lecture 2006: adoption as intervention. Meta-analytic evidence for massive catch-up and plasticity in physical, socio-emotional, and cognitive development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(12), 1228–1245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01675.x.
Wadsworth, M. E., & Achenbach, T. M. (2005). Explaining the link between low socioeconomic status and psychopathology: Testing two mechanisms of the social causation hypothesis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1146–1153. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1146.
Werum, R., Davis, T., Cheng, S., & Browne, I. (2018). Adoptive context, parental investment, and children’s educational outcomes. Journal of Family Issues, 39(3), 720–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X1668001.
Yoshikawa, H., Aber, J. L., & Beardslee, W. R. (2012). The effects of poverty on the mental, emotional, and behavioral health of children and youth: Implications for prevention. American Psychologist, 67(4), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All aspects of the study were approved by the University of South Florida institution review board (IRB).
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained according to the IRB approved protocol.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tan, T.X., Chen, S. & Li, Y. Is High Family SES Positively Associated with Youth Adjustment in the Absence of Parent–Child Genetic Connection?. J Child Fam Stud 30, 243–252 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01815-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-020-01815-0