Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Cross-Sectional Examination of Intimate Partner Violence and Mother-Child Communication

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Parent-child communication about substance abuse, violence, and HIV/AIDS (i.e., SAVA) may protect against intergenerational risks, as open communication can enhance children’s resilience to combat adversities. We used moderation analyses to identify variables that affect mothers’ comfort with communicating with their children about SAVA.

Methods

Participants (Mage = 34.62 years; SD = 7.95) were mothers of youth between the ages of 6 and 14 who endorsed experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV) within the last six months. Mothers reported on their experiences with IPV victimization (Revised Conflict Tactics Scale) and perpetration (History of Violence Perpetration Measure), and their comfort communicating with their children about SAVA (Parent-Child Communication about SAVA Scale).

Results

More severe IPV was associated with less comfort communicating (β = −003; p < 0.01). In addition, more frequent IPV perpetration was associated with less comfort communicating (β = −2.46; p < 0.01). Moderation was supported, such that the association between experiencing IPV and comfort with communication varied by experiences with IPV perpetration (β = 0.01; p < 0.01). Child’s age was a significant moderator of the relationship between bidirectional intimate partner violence (i.e., experiencing both victimization and perpetration), and comfort with communicating (β = −0.0004; p < 0.01).

Conclusions

Findings highlight the negative consequences of bidirectional violence, such that mothers who are both victims and perpetrators of violence were less willing to communicate with their children. Given the crucial role of communication in promoting resilience, this lack of communication may place children on a problematic health trajectory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author contributions

R.K.: designed and executed the study, analyzed data, and wrote the paper. K.H.: designed and executed larger parent study, collaborated with the design of the present study, and writing of the paper. L.E.S.: collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. L.M.S.: collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript. I.T.: designed and executed larger parent study, collaborated with the design of the present study, and writing of the paper.

Funding

This study was funded by grants from The University of Memphis Faculty Research Grant Fund and The University of Memphis Diversity Research Grant. This support does not necessarily imply endorsement by the University of research conclusions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Idia B. Thurston.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Memphis Institutional Review Board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamody, R.C., Howell, K.H., Schwartz, L.E. et al. A Cross-Sectional Examination of Intimate Partner Violence and Mother-Child Communication. J Child Fam Stud 29, 1363–1373 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01617-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01617-z

Keywords

Navigation