Abstract
Objectives
There is a dearth of studies on the social validity of mindfulness-based school programs because the primary emphasis has been on effectiveness or efficacy of the programs in terms of academic engagement and performance, and classroom behavior of the students. The aim of the present study was to assess secondary outcomes of a mindfulness-based preschool program in terms of parental social validity.
Methods
Forty parents whose children were in a larger study that evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of the OpenMind-Korea (OM-K) preschool program participated. At the end of the school year, these parents completed a 7-item social validity rating scale on the social significance of the OM-K program.
Results
The majority of the parents rated the OM-K program as being socially valid. They noted that their children learned skills that they could use both at home and in the preschool, and that they would recommend this program to other parents. The parents rated the program as simple to use, acceptable, effective, and without unintended adverse effects.
Conclusions
Overall mean parent ratings of the social validity of the OM-K program were high and congruent with overall mean teacher feasibility and acceptability ratings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Felver, J. C., Frank, J. L., & McEachern, A. D. (2014). Effectiveness, acceptability, and feasibility of the soles of the feet mindfulness- based intervention with elementary school students. Mindfulness, 5, 589–597.
Ferguson, J. L., Cihon, J. H., Leaf, J. B., Van Meter, S. M., McEachin, J., & Leaf, R. (2018). Assessment of social validity trends in the journal of applied behavior analysis. European Journal of Behavior Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2018.1534771.
Foster, S. L., & Mash, E. J. (1999). Assessing social validity in clinical treatment research issues and procedures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 308–319.
Jackman, M. M. (2016a). OpenMind—A mindfulness-based social emotional learning program for Pre-K children: Daily practice Activities. Port St. Lucie, FL: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.
Jackman, M. M. (2016b). OpenMind—A mindfulness-based social emotional learning curriculum for Pre-K children: Learning activities. Port St. Lucie, FL: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.
Jackman, M. M. (2017a). OpenMind—A mindfulness-based social emotional learning program for Pre-K children: Daily practice Activities (2nd ed.). Port St. Lucie, FL: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.
Jackman, M. M. (2017b). OpenMind—A mindfulness-based social emotional learning curriculum for Pre-K children: Learning activities (2nd ed.). Port St. Lucie, FL: Little Lotus Therapy and Consulting.
Jackman, M. M., Kim, E., Jo, S.-H., Oh, J., & Ko, S.-Y. (2017c). 오픈마인드 코리아: 유아를 위한 마음챙김 사회정서학습 교육과정 [OpenMind-Korea: A Mindfulness-based Social Emotional Learning Curriculum for Kindergarten Children]. Iksan: The Institute of Mind Humanities, Wonkwang University.
Jackman, M. M., Nabors, L. A., McPherson, C. L., Quaid, J. D., & Singh, N. N. (2019). Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the OpenMind (OM) program for preschool children. Journal of Child and Family Studies. (Advance of Print).
Kennedy, C. H. (1992). Trends in the measurement of social validity. The Behavior Analyst, 15, 147–156.
Kim, E., Jackman, M. M., Jo, S.-H., Oh, J., Ko, S.-Y., McPherson, C. L., & Singh, N. N. (2019). Feasibility and acceptability of the mindfulness-based OpenMind-Korea (OM-K) preschool program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 28(8), 2187–2198.
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., D’Amico, F., Buonocunto, F., et al. (2017). Helping people in a minimally conscious state develop responding and stimulation control through a microswitch-aided program. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 53(3), 433–440.
Rempel, K. D. (2012). Mindfulness for children and youth: a review of the literature with an argument for school-based implementation. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 46, 201–220.
Schwartz, I. S., & Baer, D. M. (1991). Social validity assessments: Is current practice start of the art? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 189–204.
Semple, R. J., Droutman, V., & Reid, B. A. (2017). Mindfulness goes to school: Things learned (so far) from research and real-world experiences. Psychology in the Schools, 54, 29–52.
Singh, N. N., & Jackman, M. M. (2017). Teaching mindfulness to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and their caregivers. In D. McCown, D. K. Reibel & M. S. Micozzi (Eds), Resources for teaching mindfulness: A cross-cultural and international handbook (pp. 287–305). New York, NY: Springer.
Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Winton, A. S. W., Wahler, R. G., Singh, J., & Sage, M. (2004). Mindful caregiving increases happiness among individuals with profound multiple disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 25, 207–218.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Williams, M., & Penman, D. (2011). Mindfulness: an eight-week plan for finding peace in a frantic world. New York: Rodale.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: the case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.
Worthen, D., & Luiselli, J. K. (2017). Social validity assessment and intervention evaluation of mindfulness education and practices with high school students. Mindfulness, 8(4), 903–910.
Author Contributions
E.K. designed and executed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper; M.M.J., S.J., J.O., and C.L.M. contributed to the writing and revision of the paper; S.K. provided research support; and N.N.S. collaborated in all phases of the study.
Funding
Preparation of this research was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2010-361- A00008) funded by the Korean Government (MEST).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
MMJ is the developer of the OM program. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
The Institutional Review Board at Wonkwang University provided ethical approval for the research component of the OM-K program. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all parents.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, E., Jackman, M.M., Jo, SH. et al. Parental Social Validity of the Mindfulness-Based OpenMind-Korea (OM-K) Preschool Program. J Child Fam Stud 28, 2922–2926 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01516-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01516-3