Abstract
Objectives
This study examines how different variations in self-control and risky lifestyles correspond to the different variations in bullying victimization within the integrated approach of low self-control and risky lifestyles.
Methods
Using five waves of longitudinal data of 2844 Korean school-age youth, the study investigates the potential bidirectional/reciprocal effects and unidirectional effects between deviant peer associations and involvement in delinquent behaviors. The study estimates a conditional factor-of-curves model incorporating both low self-control and bullying victimization.
Results
The results reveal that youth with more rapid growth rate in deviant peer associations demonstrated more rapid growth rate in involvement in delinquent behaviors. Also, youth with less self-control were more likely to engage in risky lifestyles during the fourth grade and demonstrated a gradual decline in risky lifestyles over time. Further, youth with less self-control showed a gradually decreasing rate of risky lifestyles over time, which in turn led to higher risk of bullying victimization.
Conclusions
The relationship between self-control and victimization is well established both theoretically and empirically even after controlling for lifestyles.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Borowsky, I. W., Taliaferro, L. A., & McMorris, B. J. (2013). Suicidal thinking and behavior among youth involved in verbal and social bullying: risk and protective factors. Journal of Adolescent Health, 53(1), S4–S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.280.
Chen, D., Drabick, D. A., & Burgers, D. E. (2015). A developmental perspective on peer rejection, deviant peer affiliation, and conduct problems among youth. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 46(6), 823–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-014-0522-y.
Cho, S. (2017a). Explaining the overlap between bullying perpetration and bullying victimization: assessing the time-ordered and the correlative relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 79, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.016.
Cho, S. (2017b). Self-control and risky lifestyles in context: cross-level integration between opportunity and collective efficacy in the study of peer victimization among South Korean youths. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 26(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0554-y.
Cho, S., Hong, J. S., Espelage, D. L., & Choi, K. (2017). Applying the lifestyle routine activities theory to understand physical and non-physical peer victimization. The Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 26(3), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2016.1264526.
Cho, S., & Lee, J. R. (2018). Impacts of low self-control and delinquent peer associations on bullying growth trajectories among Korean youth: a latent growth mixture modeling approach. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518786495.
Cho, S., & Wooldredge, J. (2018). Lifestyles, informal controls, and youth victimization risk in South Korea and the United States. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(4), 1358–1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0973-4.
Cho, S., Wooldredge, J., & Sun Park, C. (2016). Lifestyles/routine activities and bullying among South Korean youths. Victims & Offenders, 11(2), 285–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2014.982235.
Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activities approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608.
Cohen, L. E., Kluegel, J. R., & Land, K. C. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: an exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review, 46, 505–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094935.
Deryol, R., Wilcox, P., & Dolu, O. (2017). School-based violent victimization in Turkey: an examination of the cross-national generality of lifestyle-routine activities and self-control theories. Victims & Offenders, 12(6), 913–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2016.1231727.
Dong, B., & Krohn, M. D. (2016). Dual trajectories of gang affiliation and delinquent peer association during adolescence: an examination of long-term offending outcomes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(4), 746–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0417-2.
Duncan, S. C., & Duncan, T. E. (1996). A multivariate latent growth curve analysis of adolescent substance use. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540050.
Espelage, D., Holt, M., & Henkel, R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextualeffects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00531.
Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. W. (2015). Developmental pathways from childhood aggression–disruptiveness, chronic peer rejection, and deviant friendships to early‐adolescent rule breaking. Child Development, 86(2), 614–631. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12321.
Fisher, B., Daigle, L., & Cullen, F. (2010). What distinguishes single from recurrent sexual victims? The role of lifestyle‐routine activities and first‐incident characteristics. Justice Quarterly, 27(1), 102–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902763061.
Fox, K., & Bouffard, L. (2015). Violent victimization vulnerability: testing a conceptual model of personality, social, and community factors. Deviant Behavior, 36(11), 910–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.977201.
Franklin, C. A. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-control and alcohol-induced sexual assault victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854810394800.
Franklin, C. A., Franklin, T. W., Nobles, M. R., & Kercher, G. A. (2012). Assessing the effect of routine activity theory and self-control on property, personal, and sexual assault victimization. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39(10), 1296–1315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854812453673.
Garofalo, J. (1987). Reassessing the lifestyle model of criminal victimization. In M. R. Gottfredson and T. Hirschi (eds), Positive criminology (pp. 23-42). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Grasmick, H. G., Tittle, C. R., Bursik, R. J., & Arneklev, B. J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(1), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427893030001002.
Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., & Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of personal crime: An empirical foundation for a theory of personal victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
Holtfreter, K., Reisig, M. D., Piquero, N. L., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). Low self-control and fraud offending, victimization, and their overlap. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854809354977.
Jenkins, L. N., Demaray, M. K., Fredrick, S. S., & Summers, K. H. (2016). Associations among middle school students’ bullying roles and social skills. Journal of School Violence, 15(3), 259–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2014.986675.
Kerley, K., Xu, X., & Sirisunyaluck, B. (2008). Self-control, intimate partner abuse, and intimate partner victimization: testing the general theory of crime in Thailand. Deviant Behavior, 29(6), 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620701673156.
Kozasa, S., Oiji, A., Kiyota, A., Sawa, T., & Kim, S. Y. (2017). Relationship between the experience of being a bully/victim and mental health in preadolescence and adolescence: a cross-sectional study. Annals of General Psychiatry, 16(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-017-0160-4.
Kulig, T., Pratt, T., Cullen, F., Chouhy, C., & Unnever, J. (2017). Explaining bullying victimization: assessing the generality of the low self-control/risky lifestyle model. Victims & Offenders, 12(6), 891–912. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2017.1307297.
Lee, C. H. (2009). Personal and interpersonal correlates of bullying behaviors among Korean middle school students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 152–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260508329124.
Lorenz, F. O., Wickrama, K. A. S., & Conger, R. D. (2004). Modeling continuity and change in family relationships with panel data. Continuity and change in family relations: Theory, methods, and empirical findings (pp. 15–62). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Meyer-Adams, N., & Conner, B. T. (2008). School violence: bullying behaviors and the psychosocial school environment in middle schools. Children and Schools, 30, 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/cs/30.4.211.
Miethe, T. D., & Meier, R. F. (1994). Crime and its social context: Toward an integrated theory of offenders, victims, and situations. Albany, NY: Suny Press.
Monahan, K. C., Rhew, I. C., Hawkins, J. D., & Brown, E. C. (2014). Adolescent pathways to co‐occurring problem behavior: the effects of peer delinquency and peer substance use. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(4), 630–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12053.
Muthen, L., & Muthen, B. (2015). Mplus user’s guide. 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.
Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school. Aggressive behavior (pp. 97–130). Boston, MA: Springer.
Park, I. (2000). A social-cultural study on peer rejection phenomenon of adolescent groups. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 7(2), 39–71.
Piquero, A. R., Jennings, W. G., Diamond, B., Farrington, D. P., Tremblay, R. E., Welsh, B. C., & Gonzalez, J. M. R. (2016). A meta-analysis update on the effects of early family/parent training programs on antisocial behavior and delinquency. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 12(2), 229–248.
Piquero, A. R., MacDonald, J., Dobrin, A., Daigle, L. E., & Cullen, F. T. (2005). Self-control, violent offending, and homicide victimization: assessing the general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(1), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-004-1787-2.
Piquero, A. R., Piquero, N. L., & Underwood, M. K. (2017). Correlates of—and consequences for—bully-victims in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 15(4), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016657396.
Reyns, B., Burek, M., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. (2013). The unintended consequences of digital technology: exploring the relationship between sexting and cybervictimization. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648x.2011.641816.
Reyns, B., Henson, B., & Fisher, B. (2014). Digital deviance: low self-control and opportunity as explanations of sexting among college students. Sociological Spectrum, 34(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.895642.
Savolainen, J., Sipilä, P., Martikainen, P., & Anderson, A. (2009). Family, community, and lifestyle: adolescent victimization in Helsinki. The Sociological Quarterly, 50(4), 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2009.01155.x.
Schreck, C. J. (1999). Criminal victimization and low self-control: an extension and test of a general theory of crime. Justice Quarterly, 16(3), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829900094291.
Schreck, C., Fisher, B., & Miller, J. (2004). The social context of violent victimization: a study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820400095731.
Schreck, C. J., Stewart, E. A., & Fisher, B. S. (2006). Self-control, victimization, and their influence on risky lifestyles: a longitudinal analysis using panel data. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(4), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-006-9014-y.
Schreck, C. J., Wright, R. A., & Miller, J. M. (2002). A study of individual and situational antecedents of violent victimization. Justice Quarterly, 19(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820200095201.
Seipel, C., & Eifler, S. (2010). Opportunities, rational choice, and self-control: on the interaction of person and situation in a general theory of crime. Crime & Delinquency, 56, 167–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707312525.
Shaw, T., Dooley, J. J., Cross, D., Zubrick, S. R., & Waters, S. (2013). The Forms of Bullying Scale (FBS): validity and reliability estimates for a measure of bullying victimization and perpetration in adolescence. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032955.
Stewart, E. A., Elifson, K. W., & Sterk, C. E. (2004). Integrating the general theory of crime into an explanation of violent victimization among female offenders. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820400095771.
Stogner, J., Miller, J., Fisher, B., Stewart, E., & Schreck, C. (2014). Peer group delinquency and sexual victimization: does popularity matter? Women & Criminal Justice, 24(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/08974454.2013.842520.
Tedeschi, J. T., & Felson, R. B. (1994). Violence, aggression, and coercive actions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Tillyer, M. S., Fisher, B. S., & Wilcox, P. (2011). The effects of school crime prevention on students’ violent victimization, risk perception, and fear of crime: a multilevel opportunity perspective. Justice Quarterly, 28(2), 249–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2010.493526.
Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2013). The consequences of maladaptive coping: Integrating general strain and self-control theories to specify a causal pathway between victimization and offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 29(3), 321–345.
Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2014). “Can’t stop, won’t stop”: self-control, risky lifestyles, and repeat victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-012-9188-4.
Turanovic, J. J., & Pratt, T. C. (2015). Longitudinal effects of violent victimization during adolescence on adverse outcomes in adulthood: a focus on prosocial attachments. The Journal of pediatrics, 166(4), 1062–1069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2014.12.059.
Turanovic, J. J., Reisig, M. D., & Pratt, T. C. (2015). Risky lifestyles, low self-control, and violent victimization across gendered pathways to crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31(2), 183–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9230-9.
Vazsonyi, A. T., Machackova, H., Sevcikova, A., Smahel, D., & Cerna, A. (2012). Cyberbullying in context: direct and indirect effects by low self-control across 25 European countries. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.644919.
Vézina, J., Hébert, M., Poulin, F., Lavoie, F., Vitaro, F., & Tremblay, R. E. (2011). Risky lifestyle as a mediator of the relationship between deviant peer affiliation and dating violence victimization among adolescent girls. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(7), 814–824.
Ward, J., Fox, K., Tillyer, M., & Lane, J. (2014). Gender, low self-control, and violent victimization. Deviant Behavior, 36(2), 113–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2014.915671.
Wiesner, M., & Rab, S. (2014). Self-control and lifestyles: associations to juvenile offending, violent victimization, and witnessing violence. Victims & Offenders, 10(2), 214–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2014.941520.
Wilcox, P., Land, K. C., & Hunt, S. A. (2003). Criminal circumstance: A dynamic, multicontextual criminal opportunity theory. New York, NY: Aldine deGruyter.
Acknowledgements
The study does not involve human participants and animals.
Author Contributions
S.C. designed and executed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was not needed because this study used the 2004–2008 the Korean Youth Panel Study (KYPS) data set.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, S. Self-control, Risky Lifestyles, and Bullying Victimization Among Korean Youth: Estimating a Second-order Latent Growth Model. J Child Fam Stud 28, 2131–2144 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01432-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01432-6