Bullying and Moral Disengagement in Early Adolescence: Do Personality and Family Functioning Matter?

Abstract

Objectives

The present study adopted a multi-informant approach to investigate the contribution of personality and family functioning to moral disengagement and bullying-related behaviors in early adolescence.

Method

The sample included 102 early adolescents (53 boys and 49 girls; Mage = 12.21 years). Behaviors during bullying situations were detected by peer nominations. Self-report measures were administered to assess moral disengagement and family functioning. A parent-report was administered to detect personality traits.

Results

Findings of the hierarchical regression analyses (effect size = 0.23, power = 0.95, α = 5%; CI = 95%) showed that extraversion was positively associated with bullying and moral disengagement, while benevolence was positively associated with defending behavior. Family functioning was negatively associated with moral disengagement. Moderation analyses indicated that a low conscientiousness, together with a low family functioning, decreased the likelihood of defending behavior and increased the risk of bullying. High levels of benevolence decreased outsider behavior in students with a high family functioning. Although extraversion was positively associated with bullying and moral disengagement, findings suggested that it increased moral disengagement only among early adolescents with low family functioning.

Conclusions

Overall, findings underline the importance of addressing individual and contextual variables when studying bullying and moral disengagement among early adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.

  2. Baiocco, R., Cacioppo, M., Laghi, L., & Tafà, M. (2013). Factorial and construct validity of FACES IV among Italian adolescents. Journal of Children and Family Studies, 22, 962–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-012-9658-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barchia, K., & Bussey, K. (2011). Individual and collective social influences on peer aggression: exploring the contribution of aggression efficacy, moral disengagement and collective efficacy. Aggressive Behavior, 37, 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bender, D., & Lösel, F. (2011). Bullying at school as a predictor of delinquency, violence and other anti-social behavior in adulthood. Criminal Behaviour & Mental Health, 21, 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., & Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: narratives, physiological arousal and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 803–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowes, L., Maughan, B., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., & Arsenault, L. (2010). Families promote emotional and behavioral resilience to bullying: evidence of an environmental effect. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 51, 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02216.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caprara, G. V., Alessandri, G., Tisak, M. S., Paciello, M., Caprara, M. G., Gerbino, M., & Fontaine, R. G. (2012). Individual differences in personality conducive to engagement in aggression and violence. European Journal of Personality, 27, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caprara, G. V., Gerbino, M., Perinelli, M., Alessandri, G., Lenti, C., Walder, M., & Nobile, M. (2017). Individual differences in personality associated with aggressive behavior among adolescents referred for externalizing behavior problems. Journal of Psychopathology & Behavioral Assessment, 39, 680–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-017-9608-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Caprara, G. V., Tisak, M., Alessandri, G., Fontaine, R. G., Fida, R., & Paciello, M. (2014). The contribution of moral disengagement in mediating individual tendencies toward aggression and violence. Developmental Psychology, 50, 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Caravita, S. C. S., Gini, G., & Pozzoli, T. (2012). Main and moderated effect of moral cognition and status on bullying and defending. Aggressive Behavior, 38, 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Connolly, I., & O’ Moore, M. (2003). Personality and family relations of children who bully. Personality & Individual Differences, 35, 559–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00218-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Angelis, G., Bacchini, D., & Affuso, G. (2016). The mediating role of domain judgement in the relation between the Big Five and bullying behaviours. Personality & Individual Differences, 90, 16–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.029.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Blas, L., Serafino, F., & De Fruyt, F. (2012). La versione italiana del Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). Contributo alla validazione e taratura. [The Italian Version of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). A contribution to its validation and calibration]. Età Evolutiva, 82, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2010). A social-ecological model for bullying prevention and intervention: understanding the impact of adults in the social ecology of youngsters. In S. R. Jimerson, S. M. Swearer & D. L. Espelage (Eds), Handbook of bullying in schools: An international perspective (pp. 61–72). New York: Routledge.

  18. Field. A. (2017). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th Edition, London: Sage Publications.

  19. Gini, G., Pozzoli, T., & Bussey, K. (2015). The role of individual and collective moral disengagement in peer aggression and bystanding: a multilevel analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 43, 441–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9920-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hyde, L. W., Shaw, D. S., & Moilanen, K. L. (2010). Developmental precursors of moral disengagement and the role of moral disengagement in the development of antisocial behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9358-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Inchley, J., Currie, D., Young, T., Samdal, O., Torsheim, T., Augustson, L., Mathison, F., Aleman-Diaz, A., Molcho, M., Weber, M., & Barnekow, V. (Eds) (2016). Growing up unequal: gender and socio-economic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: International report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe (Health Policy for Children and Adolescents, No. 7).

  22. Jaccard, J., Wan, C. K., & Turrisi, R. J. (1990). The detection and interpretation of interaction effects between continuous variables in multiple regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 467–478. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2504_4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kochanska, G. (2002). Committed compliance, moral self and internalization: a mediation model. Developmental Psychology, 38, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kohnstamm G.A., Halverson C.F., Mervielde I., & Havill, V.L. (1998). Parental descriptions of child personality: Developmental antecedents of the Big Five? Mahwah: LEA.

  25. Kokkinos, C. M., Voulgaridou, I., & Markos, A. (2016). Personality and relational aggression: moral disengagement and friendship quality as mediators. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Menesini, E., & Camodeca, M. (2008). Shame and guilt as behavior regulators: relationships with bullying, victimization and prosocial behavior. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 183–196. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X205281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Menesini, E., Camodeca, M., & Nocentini, A. (2010). Bullying among siblings: the role of personality and relational variables. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151009X479402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Menesini, E., Camodeca, M., & Nocentini, A. (2013). Morality, values, traditional bullying, and cyberbullying in adolescence. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02066.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mervielde, I., De Fruyt, F. (1999). Construction of the Hierarchical Personality Inventory for Children (HiPIC). In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, F. Ostendorf (Eds), Personality psychology in Europe (vol. 7, pp.107–127). Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.

  30. Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: a meta-analytic approach. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 21, 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.01.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mulvey, K.L., Gönültaş, S., Goff, E., Irdam, G., Carlson, R., DiStefano, C., & Irvin, M.J. (2018, online first). School and family factors predicting adolescent cognition regarding bystander intervention in response to bullying and victim retaliation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0941-3

  32. Murphy, T. P., Laible, D., & Augustine, M. (2017). The influences of parent and peer attachment on bullying. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26, 1388–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0663-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Nickerson, A. B., Mele, D., & Princiotta, D. (2008). Attachment and empathy as predictors of roles as defenders or outsiders in bullying interactions. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Oh, I., & Hazler, R. (2009). Contributions of personal and situational factors to bystanders’ reactions to school bullying. School Psychology International, 30, 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309106499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Olson, D. H. (2011). FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 3, 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Olson, D. H., Sprenkle, D. H., & Russell, C. S. (1979). Circumplex Model of family system: cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types and clinical application. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 16, 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1979.00003.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Cambridge: Blackwell.

  38. önder, C., & Yurtal, F. (2008). An investigation of the family characteristics of bullies, victims and positively behaving adolescents. Educational Sciences, 8, 821–832.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Palmer, S. B., Rutland, A., & Cameron, L. (2015). The development of bystander intentions and social-moral reasoning about intergroup verbal aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 33, 419–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12092.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Perren, S., Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E., Malti, T., & Hymel, S. (2012). Moral reasoning and emotion attribution of adolescent bullies, victims and bullies-victims. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02059.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding in bullying: the role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815–827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno., A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: a multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83, 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pronk, J., Olthof, T., & Goossens, F. A. (2015). Differential personality correlates of early adolescents’ bullying-related outsider and defender behavior. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 11, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614549628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Raine, A. (2002). Biosocial studies of antisocial and violent behavior in children and adults: a review. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 311–326. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015754122318.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rigby, K. (2016). Consequences of bullying in schools. The Canadian. Journal of Psychiatry, 48, 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370304800904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rivers, I., Poteat, V. P., Noret, N., & Ashurst, N. (2009). Observing bullying at school: the mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behaviour in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28, 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Shiner, R., & Caspi, A. (2003). Personality differences in childhood and adolescence: measurement, development and consequences. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 44, 2–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Spriggs, A. L., Iannotti, R. J., Nansel, T. R., & Haynie, D. L. (2007). Adolescents bullying involvement and perceived family, peer and schools relations: commonalities and differences across race/ethnicity. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/2Fj.jadohealth.2007.04.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stevens, V., Bourdeaudhuij, I., & van Oost, P. (2002). Relationship of the family environment to children’s involvement in bully/victim problems at school. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 31, 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020207003027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Swearer, S. M., & Doll, B. (2001). Bullying in schools. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v02n02_02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., & Fregoso, M. (2003). Bullying and the big five. A study of childhood personality and participant roles in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034303024002001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Valdés-Cuervo, A. A., Alcántar-Nieblas, C., Martínez-Ferrer, B., & Parra-Pérez, L. (2018). Relations between restorative parental discipline, family climate, parental support, empathy, shame and defenders in bullying. Children & Youth Services Review, 95, 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.10.015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Volk, A. A., Schiralli, K., Xia, X., Zhao, J., & Dane, A. V. (2018). Adolescent bullying and personality: a cross-cultural approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 125, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Vollrath, M. E., Hampson, S. E., & Jùliusson, P. B. (2012). Children and eating: personality and gender are associated with obesogenic food consumption and overweight in 6 to 12 year-olds. Appetite, 58, 1113–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.02.056.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Waasdorp, T. E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2018). Examining variation in adolescent bystanders’ responses to bullying. School Psychology Review, 47, 18–33. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0081.V47-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, C., Ryoo, H. J., Swearer, S. M., Turner, R., & Goldberg, T. S. (2016). Longitudinal relationships between bullying and moral disengagement among adolescents. Journal of Youth & Adolescence, 46, 1304–1317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0577-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. White, F. A., & Metawie, K. M. (2004). Parental morality and Family processes as predictors of adolescent morality. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 13, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCFS.0000015709.81116.ce.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

AM contributed to the design of the study, collected the data, drafted the theoretical sections and contributed to the literature review, interpretation of results, and writing of the paper. MC contributed to the design of the study, performed the analyses, drafted the Results sections, and contributed to the interpretation of findings and writing of the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela Mazzone.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Italian Association of Psychology (AIP) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mazzone, A., Camodeca, M. Bullying and Moral Disengagement in Early Adolescence: Do Personality and Family Functioning Matter?. J Child Fam Stud 28, 2120–2130 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01431-7

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bullying
  • Defending
  • Outsider
  • Moral disengagement
  • Personality
  • Family functioning