Positive Parenting Moderates the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Executive Functioning: A Three-Generation Approach

Abstract

Objective

While low parental socioeconomic status (SES) has been associated with lower levels of child executive functioning (EF), few have examined the intergenerational effect of SES on child EF across three generations. We adopt a resilience framework to investigate positive parenting as a protective factor in the intergenerational effect of low SES on child EF.

Methods

In a sample of 50 parents (70% female) and their oldest child (56% female, Mage = 12.38) from the Flint Adolescent Study, we estimated the effect of grandparent SES on child EF (i.e., Animal Sorting, Inhibition, Inhibition Switching) and examined the protective role of positive parenting using a multivariate regression model.

Results

Lower levels of grandparent SES was associated with lower levels of cognitive flexibility (i.e., Animal Sorting), but not inhibition (i.e., Inhibition, Inhibition Switching), at low levels of positive parenting.

Conclusion

These findings indicate the varied ways by which intergenerational SES may shape child EF. Further, positive parenting may offset the intergenerational influence of SES on child EF outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Bernier, A., Carlson, S. M., & Whipple, N. (2010). From external regulation to self‐regulation: early parenting precursors of young children’s executive functioning. Child Development, 81(1), 326–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01397.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blair, C., & Diamond, A. (2008). Biological processes in prevention and intervention: the promotion of self-regulation as a means of preventing school failure. Development and Psychopathology, 20(03), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579408000436.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Blair, C., Granger, D. A., Willoughby, M., Mills‐Koonce, R., Cox, M., Greenberg, M. T., Kivlighan, K. T., Fortunato, C. K., & Investigators F. L. P. (2011). Salivary cortisol mediates effects of poverty andparenting on executive functions in early childhood. Child Development, 82(6), 1970–1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01643.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2015). School readiness and self-regulation: a developmental psychobiological approach. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 711–731. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blair, C., & Raver, C. C. (2016). Poverty, stress, and brain development: new directions for prevention and intervention. Academic Pediatrics, 16(3), 30–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bos, K. J., Fox, N., Zeanah, C. H., & Nelson, C. A. (2009). Effects of early psychosocial deprivation on the development of memory and executive function. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 3, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.08.016.2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carozza, S. E., Puumala, S. E., Chow, E. J., Fox, E. E., Horel, S., Johnson, K. J., & Spector, L. G. (2010). Parental educational attainment as an indicator of socioeconomic status and risk of childhood cancers. British Journal of Cancer, 103(1), 136–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cates, C. B., Weisleder, A., Dreyer, B. P., Johnson, S. B., Vlahovicova, K., Ledesma, J., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Leveraging healthcare to promote responsive parenting: Impacts of the video interaction project on parenting stress. Journal of Child and Family studies, 25(3), 827–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0267-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng, H., & Furnham, A. (2012). Childhood cognitive ability, education, and personality traits predict attainment in adult occupational prestige over 17 years. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cherkas, L. F., Aviv, A., Valdes, A. M., Hunkin, J. L., Gardner, J. P., Surdulescu, G. L., & Spector, T. D. (2006). The effects of social status on biological aging as measured by white‐blood‐cell telomere length. Aging Cell, 5(5), 361–365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2006.00222.xoi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Danko, C. M., Brown, T., Van Schoick, L., & Budd, K. S. (2016). Predictors and correlates of homework completion and treatment outcomes in parent–child interaction therapy. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45(3), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-015-9339-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Devine, R. T., Bignardi, G., & Hughes, C. (2016). Executive function mediates the relations between parental behaviors and children’s early academic ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Diamond, A., & Lee, K. (2011). Interventions shown to aid executive function development in children 4 to 12 years old. Science, 333(6045), 959–964. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Easton-Brooks, D., & Davis, A. (2007). Wealth, traditional socioeconomic indicators, and the achievement debt. The Journal of Negro Education, 76(4), 530–541. https://www-jstor-org.proxy.lib.umich.edu/stable/40037226.

  15. Eisman, A. B., Lee, D. B., Hsieh, H. F., Stoddard, S. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2018). More than just keeping busy: the protective effects of organized activity participation on violence and substance use among urban youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(10), 2231–2242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-018-0868-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fergus, S., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2005). Adolescent resilience: a framework for understanding healthy development in the face of risk. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144357.

  17. Ferguson, J. L., & Ready, D. D. (2011). Expanding notions of social reproduction: grandparents’ educational attainment and grandchildren’s cognitive skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26(2), 216–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fujishiro, K., Xu, J., & Gong, F. (2010). What does “occupation” represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: exploring occupational prestige and health. Social Science & Medicine, 71(12), 2100–2107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hackman, D. A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hackman, D. A., Gallop, R., Evans, G. W., & Farah, M. J. (2015). Socioeconomic status and executive function: developmental trajectories and mediation. Developmental Science, 18(5), 686–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hook, C. J., Lawson, G. M., & Farah, M. J. (2013). Socioeconomic status and the development of executive function. In J. B. Morton (Ed.), Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development: Executive Functions. USA: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development.

  23. IBM Corp. Released. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version24.0. Armonk: IBM Corp.

  24. Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis. PrenticeHall International. New Jersey: INC.

  25. Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (2007). NEPSY-II. San Antonio: Pearson.

  26. Logue, S. F., & Gould, T. J. (2014). The neural and genetic basis of executive function: attention, cognitive flexibility, and response inhibition. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 123, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbb.2013.08.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McLoyd, V. C. (1998). Socioeconomic disadvantage and child development. American Psychologist, 53(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.2.185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Modin, B., & Fritzell, J. (2009). The long arm of the family: are parental and grandparental earnings related to young men’s body mass index and cognitive ability? International Journal of Epidemiology, 38(3), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyp001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Møllegaard, S., & Jæger, M. M. (2015). The effect of grandparents’ economic, cultural, and social capital on grandchildren’s educational success. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 42, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2015.06.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus editor (version 7). Los Angeles: Muthen & Muthen.

  31. Najman, J. M., Aird, R., Bor, W., O’Callaghan, M., Williams, G. M., & Shuttlewood, G. J. (2004). The generational transmission of socioeconomic inequalities in child cognitive development and emotional health. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), 1147–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nakao, K., & Treas, J. (1990). Computing 1989 occupational prestige scores. Publisher not identified. http://gss.norc.org/Documents/reports/methodological-reports/MR070.pdf.

  33. Neville, H. J., Stevens, C., Pakulak, E., Bell, T. A., Fanning, J., Klein, S., & Isbell, E. (2013). Family-based training program improves brain function, cognition, and behavior in lower socioeconomic status preschoolers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(29), 12138-12143. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304437110.

  34. Pedersen, J. M., Budtz-Jørgensen, E., De Roos, A., Garcia, L., Lund, R., Rod, N. H., & Michael, Y. (2017). Understanding the relation between socioeconomic position and inflammation in post-menopausal women: education, income and occupational prestige. The European Journal of Public Health, 27(6), 1074–1079. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx070.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Power, T. G. (2002). Parenting dimensions Inventory—Short version (PDIS): A research manual. Unpublished manuscript, University of Houston, TX.

  36. Raver, C. C., Blair, C., & Willoughby, M. (2013). Poverty as a predictor of 4-year-olds’ executive function: new perspectives on models of differential susceptibility. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 292 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rhoades, B. L., Greenberg, M. T., Lanza, S. T., & Blair, C. (2011). Demographic and familial predictors of early executive function development: contribution of a person-centered perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 638–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Weisleder, A., Cates, C. B., Dreyer, B. P., Johnson, S. B., Huberman, H. S., Seery, A. M., & Mendelsohn, A. L. (2016). Promotion of positive parenting and prevention of socioemotional disparities. Pediatrics, 137(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2015-3239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ursache, A., & Noble, K. G. (2016). Neurocognitive development in socioeconomic context: Multiple mechanisms and implications for measuring socioeconomic status. Psychophysiology, 53(1), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12547/full.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Vernon-Feagans, L., Willoughby, M., & Garrett-Peters, P. (2016). Predictors of behavioral regulation in kindergarten: household chaos, parenting, and early executive functions. Developmental Psychology, 52(3), 430.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6(4), 354–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

DBL designed and executed the study, conducted the data analyses, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. SA, ALM, and HFH collaborated with the design of the study and writing of subsequent drafts of the manuscript. JH and MAZ collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript. All authors approved the manuscript as submitted.

Funding

This research was supported by a grant from the National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA) (5R01DA035811-05) for the fourth (H.F.H.) and last author (M.A.Z.).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel B. Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the University of Michigan’s institutional review board and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D.B., Assari, S., Miller, A.L. et al. Positive Parenting Moderates the Effect of Socioeconomic Status on Executive Functioning: A Three-Generation Approach. J Child Fam Stud 28, 1878–1885 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01411-x

Download citation

Keywords

  • Intergenerational
  • Socioeconomic status
  • Executive functioning
  • Parenting