Peer Assisted Supervision and Support and Providers’ Use of Triple P- Positive Parenting Program

Abstract

Objectives

The current study sought to contribute to the literature by examining a possible method to promote use of an evidence-based parenting intervention, Triple P, in a large-scale implementation effort. The study was designed to examine (a) the association between attendance at Peer Assisted Supervision and Support (PASS) sessions and use of Triple P with parents among providers in a state-wide adoption of Triple P and (b) characteristics of providers most likely to attend peer supervision. In addition, we examined fidelity to the PASS model and providers’ perceived fit of Triple P with typical services as moderators of the link between attendance at supervision sessions and providers’ use of Triple P.

Methods

Two hundred seventy-six Triple P accredited providers from seven county or county clusters across North Carolina completed a 19-question survey about their experiences with Triple P, including their use of the intervention, perceived fit of the intervention to their clients’ needs, fidelity to the Triple P peer assisted supervision and support (PASS) model, and attendance at peer support sessions.

Results

Correlational analyses revealed that providers who more often attended peer support sessions used Triple P with more parents. Results of hierarchical linear regression models indicated that fidelity to the PASS model and providers’ perceived fit were not significant moderators.

Conclusions

This study highlights the potential importance of attending PASS sessions in terms of using Triple P to serve families. Implications of the findings for implementation of Triple P and other evidence-based parenting interventions and suggestions for further studies are provided.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Aarons, G. A., Cafri, G., Lugo, L., & Sawitzky, A. (2012). Expanding the domains of attitudes towards evidence-based practice: the evidence based practice attitude scale-50. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 39, 331–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asgary-Eden, V., & Lee, C. M. (2011). So now we’ve picked an evidence-based program, what’s next? Perspective of service providers and administrators. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(2), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beidas, R. S., & Kendall, P. C. (2010). Training therapists in evidence-based practice: a critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01187.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bodenmann, G., Cina, A., Ledermann, T., & Sanders, M. R. (2008). The efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in improving parenting and child behavior: a comparison with two other treatment conditions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46, 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Butchart A., Harvey A. P., Furniss T. (2006). Preventing child maltreatment: a guide to taking action and generating evidence. World Health Organization and International Society for Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2006/9241594365_eng.pdf.

  6. Fixsen, D., Naoom, S., Blase, K., & Friedman, R. (2005). Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. National Implementation Research Network. www.popline.org/node/266329.

  7. Graaf, I., Speetjens, P., Smit, F., Wolff, M., & Tavecchio, L. (2008). Effectiveness of the Triple P Positive Parenting Program on behavioral problems in children: a meta-analysis. Behavior Modification, 32, 714–735. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00522.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Herschell, A. D. (2010). Fidelity in the field: developing infrastructure and fine-tuning measurement. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17, 253–257. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01216.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hodge, L. M., Turner, K. M. T., Sanders, M. R., & Filus, A. (2016). Sustained Implementation Support Scale: validation of a measure of program characteristics and workplace functioning for sustained program implementation. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 43, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-016-9505-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerns, S., Negrete, A., & McCormick, E. (2014). Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery Triple P initiative. Unpublished evaluation report available from the first author at the University of Washington, Seattle.

  11. Masters, G., Gaven, S., Pennington, A., & Askew, L. (2011). Evaluation of the implementation of Triple P in NSW. Sydney: Nexus Management Consulting.

  12. McPherson, K. E., Sanders, M. R., Schroeter, B., Troy, V., & Wiseman, K. (2016). Acceptability and feasibility of Peer Assisted Supervision and Support for intervention practitioners: a Q-methodology evaluation. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25, 720–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-015-0281-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McWilliam, J., Brown, J., Sanders, M. R., & Jones, L. (2016). The Triple P implementation framework: the role of purveyors in the implementation and sustainability of evidence-based programs. Prevention Science, 17, 636–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0661-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Authors.

  15. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2008). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles CA: Authors.

  16. Novins, D. K., Green, A. E., Legha, R. K., & Aarons, G. A. (2013). Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices for child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 52, 1009–1025.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaac.2013.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Prinz, R. J., Sanders, M. R., Shapiro, C. J., Whitaker, D. J., & Lutzker, J. R. (2009). Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: the U.S. Triple P system population trial. Prevention Science, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0631-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanders, M. R., Burke, K., Prinz, R. J., & Morawska, A. (2017). Achieving population-level change through a system-contextual approach to supporting competent parenting. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20, 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0227-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanders, M. R., Kirby, J. N., Tellegen, C. L., & Day, J. J. (2014). The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.04.00.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sanders, M. R., & Murphy-Brennan, M. (2010). Creating conditions for success beyond the professional training environment. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2009.01189.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sanders, M. R., Prinz, R. J., & Shapiro, C. J. (2009). Predicting utilization of evidence-based parenting interventions with organizational, service-provider and client variables. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 36(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-009-0205-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shapiro, C. J., Prinz, R. J., & Sanders, M. R. (2012). Facilitators and barriers to implementation of an evidence-based parenting intervention to prevent child Maltreatment: The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program. Child Maltreatment, 17, 86–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077559511424774.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Turner, K. M. T., & Sanders, M. R. (2006). Dissemination of evidence-based parenting and family support strategies: learning from the Triple P—Positive Parenting Program system approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.07.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

CRO designed the study, assisted with data analyses, and led preparation of the manuscript. MEH collected and managed the data and co-wrote the manuscript. KN assisted with data analyses and co-wrote the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitlyn R. Owens.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All procedures were reviewed and approved by the NC State University IRB.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Owens, C.R., Haskett, M.E. & Norwalk, K. Peer Assisted Supervision and Support and Providers’ Use of Triple P- Positive Parenting Program. J Child Fam Stud 28, 1664–1672 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01385-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Evidence-based program use
  • Parenting interventions
  • Triple P
  • Peer Assisted Supervision and Support
  • Implementation