Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 547–559 | Cite as

Social Capital, Parenting, and African American Families

  • Andrea G. HunterEmail author
  • Selma Chipenda-Dansokho
  • Shuntay Z. Tarver
  • Melvin Herring
  • Anne Fletcher
Original Paper


African American parents and children are embedded within diverse social networks that cut across social contexts. Using a concurrent mixed-method approach, this study explored mechanisms through which kinship- and community-based social capital (i.e., intergenerational closure) may be associated with children’s own competences at accessing social capital, as well as mothers’ perspectives on the social-relational processes adhered in intergenerational closure, and on its importance for parenting and socialization goals. Third-grade children (N = 149) and their mothers participated in structured home interviews, and a subsample of mothers (n = 10) participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews. Path analysis (LISREL) indicated that kinship-based intergenerational closure was positively associated with communication between mothers and children (e.g., peers and friendships, importance of talking, life lessons) which was positively associated with children’s self-efficacy in accessing intergenerational social resources (i.e., from adults). Community-based intergenerational closure was positively associated with parental community engagement. Parents involved in community organizations engaged in more parent-to-parent communication regarding parenting and childrearing issues. Greater communication between parents was positively associated with children’s self-efficacy. Qualitative analyses indicated that mothers cultivated intergenerational closure across social contexts, that supported parenting and reinforced values, norms, and socialization goals, relying on network processes as theorized by James Coleman. This study highlights the mechanisms that link kinship- and community-based social capital to child social competences, as well as African American mothers’ perspectives on the meanings of social relationships when there is intergenerational closure. Moreover, the study illustrates the applicability of Coleman’s theory among economically diverse, southern, African American families.


Intergenerational Closure Social capital African American families Child social competency 


Author Contributions

A.G.H.: Participated in the study design, data analysis and the interpretation of findings (quantitative and qualitative), writing of the manuscript, and participated in the design and data collection of the larger longitudinal study. S.C.D.: Participated in the study design, data analysis and interpretation of findings (quantitative and qualitative) and writing of the manuscript. S.Z.T.: Participated in the qualitative data analysis and interpretation of findings. M.H.: Participated in the literature search and collaborated in writing a component of the manuscript. A.C.F.: Participated in the design and data collection of the larger longitudinal study,and collaborated in the writing and editing of the manuscript.


The study on which this paper is based was supported by a grant to the first and fifth authors from the William T. Grant Foundation. Preparation for this paper was also supported by a grant to the first author from the North Carolina State University Agricultural Research Service.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Ainsworth, J. W. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81, 117–152. Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147. Scholar
  3. Bolin, B., Hackett, E. J., Harlan, S. L., Kirby, A., Larsen, L., Nelson, A., Rex, T. R., & Wolf, S. (2004). Bonding and bridging: understanding the relationship between social capital and civic action. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 64–77. Scholar
  4. Burton, L. M., & Jarrett, R. L. (2000). In the mix, yet on the margins: the place of families in urban neighborhood and child development research. Journal of Marriage & Family, 62(4), 1114–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burton, L. M., Obeidallah, D. O., & Allison, K. (1996). Ethnographic perspectives on social context and adolescent development among inner-city African American teens. In Jessor, R., Colby, A., & Shweder, R. (Eds.), Essays on ethnography and human development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, K. R., & Brown, R. (2003). Faith and works: church-based social capital resources and African American political activism. Social Forces, 82(2), 617–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbonaro, W. J. (1998). A little help from my friend’s parents: intergenerational closure and educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 71, 295–313. Scholar
  8. Caughy, M. O., & O’Campo, P. J. (2006). Neighborhood poverty, social capital, and the cognitive development of African American preschoolers. American Journal of Community Psychology, 37, 141–154. Scholar
  9. Caughy, M. O., O’Campo, P., & Muntaner, C. (2003). When being alone might be better: neighborhood poverty, social capital, and child mental health. Social Science & Medicine, 57, 227–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chatters, L. M., Taylor, R. J., Bullard, K. M., & Jackson, J. S. (2009). Race and ethnic differences in religious involvement: African Americans, Caribbean Blacks and non-hispanic Whites. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32, 1143–1163. Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, J. S (1990). Foundations of social theory.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Coleman, J. S., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private high schools: the impact of communities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Darling, N., Steinberg, L. & Gringlas, M., (1993). Community integration and value consensus as forces for adolescent socialization: a test of the Coleman and Hoffer hypothesis. Paper presented as part of a symposium entitled “Community and Neighborhood Influences on Adolescent Behavior” at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Child Development, New Orleans.Google Scholar
  16. Dika, S. L., & Singh, K. (2002). Applications of social capital in educational literature: a critical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 72, 31–60. Scholar
  17. Fletcher, A. C., Bridges, T. L., & Hunter, A. G. (2007). Parental involvement in children’s friendships: race, class, and friendship context. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 69, 1135–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fletcher, A. C., Hunter, A. G., & Eanes, A. Y. (2006). Links between social network closure and child well-being: the organizing role of friendship context. Developmental Psychology, 42, 1057–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fletcher, A. C., Newsome, D., Nickerson, P., & Bazley, R. (2001). Social network closure and child adjustment. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 500–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fletcher, A. C., Troutman, D. R., Gruber, K., Long, E., & Hunter, A. G. (2006). Context and closure in children’s friendships: prevalence and demographic variation. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 609–627. Scholar
  21. Furstenberg, F. F. (2005). Banking on families: how families generate and distribute social capital. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 67, 809–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furstenberg, F. F., Cook, T. D., Eccles, J., Elder, G. H., & Sameroff, A. (1999). Managing to make it: Urban families and adolescent success. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Glanville, J. L., Sikkink, D., & Hernández, E. I. (2008). Religious involvement and educational outcomes: the role of social capital and extracurricular participation. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 105–137. Scholar
  24. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. Scholar
  25. Hunt, L., & Hunt, M. O. (2001). Race, religion, and religious involvement: a comparative study of whites and African Americans. Social Forces, 80, 605–631. Scholar
  26. Hunter, A. G., Friend, C. A., Williams-Wheeler, M., & Fletcher, A. C. (2012). Race, gender, and religious differences in the social networks of children and their families. Youth & Society, 44, 450–475. Scholar
  27. Hunter, A. G., Pearson, J. L., Ialongo, N., & Kellam, S. G. (1998). Parenting alone to multiple caregivers: child care and parenting arrangements in black and white urban families. Family Relations, 47, 343–353. Scholar
  28. Lareau, A. (2002). Invisible inequality: social class and childrearing in black families and white families. American Sociological Review, 67, 747–776. Scholar
  29. Lewis, V. A., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: the impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331–346. Scholar
  30. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 139, 439–457. Scholar
  31. Marshall, N. L., Noonan, A. E., McCartney, K., Marx, F., & Keefe, N. (2001). It takes an urban village: parenting networks of urban families. Journal of Family Issues, 22(2), 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McLoyd, V. C., Hill, N. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2005). Ecological and cultural diversity in African American family life. In McLoyd, V. C., Hill, N. E., & Dodge, K. A., (Eds.), African American family life: Ecological and cultural diversity (pp. 3–20). NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Morrow, V. (1999). Conceptualising social capital in relation to the well-being of children and young people: acritical review. The Sociological Review, 47, 744–765. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Offer, S., & Schneider, B. (2007). Children’s role in generating social capital. Social Forces, 85(3), 1126–1142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pascoe, J. M., Ialongo, N. S., Horn, W. F., Reinhart, M. A., & Parradatto, D. (1988). The reliability and validity of the Maternal Social Support Index. Family Medicine, 20(4), 271–276.Google Scholar
  36. Pew forum on religion and public life (2008). U.S. religious landscape survey. Religious affiliation: diverse and dynamic.Google Scholar
  37. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  38. Schlauch, R. C., O’Malley, S. S., Rounsaville, B. J., & Ball, S. A. (2012). Internalizing and externalizing dimensions and alcohol use in first time DWI offenders: indirect effects through coping self-efficacy. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 133–139. Scholar
  39. Smith, C. (2003). Religious participation and network closure among American adolescents. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 42, 259–267. Scholar
  40. Widmer, E. D. (2006). Who are my family members: bridging, and bonding social capital in family configurations. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 6979–6998.Google Scholar
  41. Woolcock, M. (1997). Social capital and economic development: toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27, 151–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Woolcock, M. (2001). The place of social capital in understanding social and economic outcomes. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Public Policy Research, 2, 11–17. Scholar
  43. Vernberg, E. M., Beery, S. H., Ewell, K. K., & Absender, D. A. (1993). Parents’ use of friendship facilitation strategies and the formation of friendships in early adolescence: a prospective study. Journal of Family Psychology, 7, 356–369. Scholar
  44. Xu, Z., & Jang, E. E. (2017). The role of math self-efficacy in the structural model of extracurricular technology-related activities and junior elementary school students’ mathematics ability. Computers in Human Behavior, 68, 547–555. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Office of Education and Professional DevelopmentLaval UniversityQuébecCanada
  3. 3.Old Dominion UniversityNorfolkUSA
  4. 4.Johnson C. Smith UniversityCharlotteUSA
  5. 5.University of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations