Family Imprisonment, Maternal Parenting Stress and Its Impact on Mother-Child Relationship Satisfaction
- 237 Downloads
Parental imprisonment, and more recently other close family imprisonment, has been associated with long-term harms to children. A number of researchers have proposed that parenting stress caused by family imprisonment could impact on caregivers’ ability to offer a secure parent–child relationship after a close family member is imprisoned. Such relationship problems might then mediate further harms to children. The Family Stress-Proximal Process (FSPP) model conceptualises family imprisonment as an ongoing stressor that influences relational processes in families. Using HILDA, a nationally-representative Australian survey, we test key aspects of this theoretical model for women affected by close family imprisonment. We demonstrate that recent close family imprisonment does indeed significantly increase risks of high maternal parenting stress. Women affected by this high parenting stress are also significantly more likely to report feeling less satisfied with their relationship with their child one year later. Nonetheless, only a third of women experiences high parenting stress after close family imprisonment. And, women who experience close family imprisonment without high parenting stress do not have a greater risk of subsequent relationship dissatisfaction. We conclude that the prevention or reduction of parenting stress in families affected by close family imprisonment could have a protective effect on subsequent mother-child relationships.
KeywordsParenting stress Family imprisonment Maternal bonding Parent-child relationship Prison
This paper uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS), and managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research Melbourne Institute. The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the author and should not be attributed to either DSS or the Melbourne Institute.
KLB: Conducted the data analysis and wrote the paper. SMD: Supervised manuscript development and edited draft and final manuscripts.
The second author was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship. Views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of the Australian Research Council. Where quoted or used, they should be clearly attributed to the authors. Susan Dennison was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT0991557).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anthony, L. G., Anthony, B. J., Glanville, D. N., Naiman, D. Q., Waanders, C., & Shaffer, S. (2005). The relationships between parenting stress, parenting behaviour and preschoolers’ social competence and behaviour problems in the classroom. Infant and Child Development, 14(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Beeber, L. S., Schwartz, T. A., Martinez, M. I., Holditch-Davis, D., Bledsoe, S. E., Canuso, R., & Lewis, V. S. (2014). Depressive symptoms and compromised parenting in low-income mothers of infants and toddlers: distal and proximal risks. Research in Nursing & Health, 37(4), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.21604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Besemer, K. L., & Dennison, S. M. (2018). Intergenerational social exclusion in prisoners’ families. In M. Hutton, D. Moran (Eds.) Handbook on prison and the family. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Besemer, K. L., van de Weijer, S., & Dennison, S. M. (2018). Risk marker or risk mechanism? The effect of family, household and parental imprisonment on children and adults' social support and mental health. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 45(8), 1154–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854818782711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Boss, P., Bryant, C. M., & Mancini, J. A. (2016). Family stress management: a contextual approach. Melbourne: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Deater-Deckard, K. (1998). Parenting stress and child adjustment: some old hypotheses and new questions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 5(3), 314–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.1998.tb00152.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dennison, S. M. (2011). Developmental and life-course criminology – theories, research and policy implications. In A. F. Stewart, T. Allard & S. M. Dennison (Eds.), Evidence-based policy & practice in youth justice (pp. 46–62). Annandale, Australia: The Federation Press.Google Scholar
- Dennison, S., Smallbone, H., Stewart, A., Freiberg, K., & Teague, R. (2014). ‘My life is separated’: an examination of the challenges and barriers to parenting for Indigenous fathers in prison. British Journal of Criminology, 54(6), 1089–1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azu072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farrington, D. P. (2011). Integrated developmental and life-course theories of offending (Vol. 1). London: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Farrington, D. P., Barnes, G. C., & Lambert, S. (1996). The concentration of offending in families. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1(1), 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8333.1996.tb00306.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Farrington, D. P., Jolliffe, D., Loeber, R., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & Kalb, L. M. (2001). The concentration of offenders in families, and family criminality in the prediction of boys’ delinquency. Journal of Adolescence, 24(5), 579–596. https://doi.org/10.1006/jado.2001.0424.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hofferth, S., Davis-Kean, P. E., Davis, J., & Finkelstein, J. (1997). The child development supplement to the panel study of income dynamics: 1997 user guide. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
- Johnston, D., & Gabel, K. (1995). Incarcerated parents. In K. Gabel & D. Johnston (Eds.), Children of incarcerated parents (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Lee, H., Wildeman, C., Wang, E. A., Matusko, N., & Jackson, J. S. (2014). A heavy burden: the cardiovascular health consequences of having a family member incarcerated. American Journal of Public Health, 104(3), 421–427. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301504.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Meek, R., Lowe, K., & McPhillips, K. (2010). The impact of a custodial sentence on the siblings of young offenders: matching service to needs. Prison Service Journal, 190, 26–31.Google Scholar
- Murray, J. (2005). The effects of imprisonment on families and children of prisoners. In A. Liebling & S. Maruna (Eds.), The effects of imprisonment (pp. 442–492). Devon, UK: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Murray, J., Farrington, D. P., & Sekol, I. (2012). Children’s antisocial behavior, mental health, drug use, and educational performance after parental incarceration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 175 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026407.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Quilty, S., Levy, M. H., Howard, K., Barratt, A., & Butler, T. (2004). Children of prisoners: a growing public health problem. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 28(4), 339–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842x.2004.tb00441.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roettger, M. E., & Boardman, J. D. (2012). Parental incarceration and gender-based risks for increased body mass index: evidence from the national longitudinal study of adolescent health in the United States. American Journal of Epidemiology, 175(7), 636–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwr409.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Silveira, E., Taft, C., Sundh, V., Waern, M., Palsson, S., & Steen, B. (2005). Performance of the SF-36 health survey in screening for depressive and anxiety disorders in an elderly female swedish population. Quality of Life Research, 14(5), 1263–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-7753-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stone, L. L., Mares, S. H. W., Otten, R., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2016). The co-development of parenting stress and childhood internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 38(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-015-9500-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Summerfield, M., Freidin, S., Hahn, M., La, N., Li, N., Macalalad, N., & Wooden, M. (2016). HILDA user manual – release 15. Retrieved from http://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/2194342/HILDA_User_Manual_Release_15.0.pdf.
- Walsh, F. (2003). Family resilience: strengths forced through adversity. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes: growing diversity and complexity (pp. 399–423). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Wilkins, R. (2015). The household, income and labour dynamics in Australia survey: selected findings from waves 1 to 12. Melbourne, VIC: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
- Wilkins, R., & Warren, D. (2012). Families, incomes and jobs, volume 7: a statistical report on waves 1 to 9 of the household, income and labour dynamics in Australia survey. Retrieved from the HILDA, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research website: http://www.melbourneinstitute.com/downloads/hilda/Stat_Report/statreport-v7-2012.pdf.
- Wooden, M. (2003). Balancing work and family at the start of the 21 st century: Evidence from wave 1 of the HILDA survey. Paper presented at the 2003 Melbourne Institute Economic and Social Outlook Conference. Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from: https://melbourneinstitute.unimelb.edu.au/assets/documents/hilda-bibliography/conference-papers-lectures/2003/Wooden_Balancing_Work_and_Family.pdf.