Skip to main content
Log in

Values and Beliefs as Risk and Protective Factors for Physical Punishment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Physical punishment is widely used in the U.S., despite links to several negative child outcomes. Considering the increasing cultural diversity and that researchers who link cultural values to physical punishment focus within instead of across groups, it is worthwhile to explore whether certain values that have been linked to physical punishment within groups are applicable to other group that may share similar beliefs. Further, while researchers typically focus on exploring risk factors for physical punishment, the current study explores both risk (e.g., filial piety, machismo attitudes) and protective (e.g., familism) factors. Using a survey of 736 racially/ethnically diverse undergraduate students, this study addresses how students varied in their experiences of physical punishment growing up, based on their ratings of their caregivers’ values. Regression results indicate that having a caregiver with stronger machismo attitudes was linked to higher odds of experiencing any, AOR= 1.48, p< .001, 95% CI [1.23, 1.78], as well as moderate to severe, AOR= 1.57, p< .001, 95% CI [1.28, 1.91] physical punishment; this was true across the full sample, despite machismo attitudes being studied in Hispanic/Latino populations typically. However, familism and filial piety were not associated with physical punishment for the sample. These findings suggest that it is worthwhile to explore how traditional values that are typically attributed to certain groups may be linked to physical punishment across more diverse populations, as different groups may share similar beliefs that are linked to physical punishment in similar ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank my dissertation committee chair, Stephanie M. Reich, and committee members, Rossella Santagata and Chuansheng Chen, for their time and support. Additionally, I would like to thank the participants of this study for making this research possible.

Funding

This study was funded by a Society for Research in Child Development Student and Early Career Council Dissertation Research Funding Award and a University of California, Irvine Chancellor’s Club Fund for Excellence Fellowship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joyce Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, J. Values and Beliefs as Risk and Protective Factors for Physical Punishment. J Child Fam Stud 27, 3413–3425 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1153-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1153-x

Keywords

Navigation