Abstract
This paper presents an exploratory study of two contrasting cases observed longitudinally, using the different versions of the LTP procedure from infancy to adolescence, to evaluate the continuity of family processes, coparenting, and children’s triangular communication. Two cases, matched for SES and gender of the children, were selected from a sample of 50 volunteer families. One family had a functional alliance, while the other had a detouring coalition. We begin with descriptions of the family interactions, the coparenting alliance and the children’s triangular communication at 18 months, followed by brief descriptions of their LTPs at 3 and 9 months as well as at 5 years. Finally, we present the LTP for adolescents and their parents, which involves a discussion task rather than play (LTP/Discussion). Detailed excerpts contrast the interactions of the two families once the children were 15 years old. These descriptions show the continuity of family processes, particularly “three-way” communication in the family with a functional alliance vs. “two-against one” communication in the family with a coalition. Data from microanalysis of gaze and affect, during the LTP/Discussion, provide a second way of assessing communication patterns. The microanalysis revealed great discrepancies between the families at adolescence, not only in terms of the pattern of gaze interaction, but also with respect to the valence of affects. In the functional alliance, fun and affection dominated and gaze patterns were typical of three-way communication. Gaze patterns of restricted communication, lack of empathy and hostility characterised the detouring coalition.
References
Beebe, B. (2017). Daniel Stern: Microanalysis and the empirical infant research foundations. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 37(4), 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2017.1299498.
Bradley, B. S., & Smithson, M. (2017). Groupness in preverbal infants: Proof of concept. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 385 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00385.
Carneiro, C., Corboz‐Warnery, A., & Fivaz‐Depeursinge, E. (2006). The prenatal lausanne trilogue play: A new observational assessment tool of the prenatal co‐parenting alliance. Infant Mental Health Journal, 27(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20089.
Coan, J. A., & Gottman, J. M. (2007). The specific affect coding system (SPAFF). In J. A. Coan & J. J. B. Allen (Eds.), Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment. Series in affective science (pp. 267–285). New York: Oxford University Press.
Emde, R., Biringen, Z., Clyman, R. B., & Oppenheim, D. (1991). The moral self in infancy, affective core and procedural knowledge. Developmental Review, 11(3), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-2297(91)90013-E.
Favez, N., Frascarolo, F., & Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. (2006). Family alliance stability and change from pregnancy to toddlerhood and marital correlates. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 213–220. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.65.4.213.
Favez, N., Frascarolo, F., & Lavanchy, C. (2005). From family play to family narratives. The Signal, 12, 1–7.
Favez, N., Lopes, F., Bernard, M., Frascarolo, F., Lavanchy Scaiola, C., Corboz-Warnery, A., & Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. (2012). The development of family alliance from pregnancy to toddlerhood and child outcomes at 5 years. Family Process, 51, 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01419.x.
Favez, N., Tissot, H., & Frascarolo, F. (2017) Is it typical? The ecological validity of the observation of mother-father-infant interactions in the Lausanne Trilogue Play. European Journal of Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1326907.
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. (2017). The present moment in the primary triangle. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 37(4), 242–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2017.1299499.
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Cairo, S., Lavanchy Scaiola, C., & Favez, N. (2012). Nine-month-olds triangular interactive strategies with their parents’ couple in low coordination families. A descriptive study. Infant Mental Health Journal, 33(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.20314.
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Corboz-Warnery, A. (1999). The primary triangle: A developmental systems view of mothers, fathers, and infants. New-York, NY: Basic books.
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Favez, N., Lavanchy, C., de Noni, S., & Frascarolo, F. (2005). Four-month-olds make triangular bids to father and mother during trilogue play with still-face. Social Development, 14(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/1.1467-9507.2005.00306.x.
Fivaz‐Depeursinge, E., Frascarolo, F., & Corboz‐Warnery, A. (1996). Assessing the triadic alliance between fathers, mothers, and infants at play. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(74), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.23219967404.
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Lavanchy-Scaiola, C., & Favez, N. (2010). The young infant’s triangular communication in the family: Access to threesome intersubjectivity? Conceptual considerations and case illustrations. Psychoanalytic dialogues, 20(2), 125–140.
Fivaz–Depeursinge, E., Lopes, F., Python, M., & Favez, N. (2009). Coparenting and toddler’s interactive styles in family coalitions. Family Process, 48(4), 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2009.01298.x.
Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., & Philipp, D.A. (2014). The baby and the couple. New-York, NY: Routledge.
Gottman, J. M., Murray, J., Swanson, C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. (2003). The mathematics of marriage: Nonlinear dynamic models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobvitz, D., Hazen, N., Curran, M., & Hitchens, K. (2004). Observations of early triadic family interactions: Boundary disturbances in the family predict symptoms of depression, anxiety, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in middle childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 16(03), 577–592. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579404004675.
Kerig, P. K. (1995). Triangles in the family circle: effects of family structure on marriage, parenting, and child adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology, 9(1), 28–43.
McHale, J. (2007). When infants grow up in multiperson relationship systems. Infant Mental Health Journal, 28, 1–23.
McHale, J., Fivaz-Depeursinge, E., Dickstein, S., Robertson, J., & Daley, M. (2008). New evidence for the social embeddedness of infant’s early triangular capacities. Family Process, 47, 445–463.
McHale, J. P., Kuersten, R., & Lauretti, A. (1996). New directions in the study of family‐level dynamics during infancy and early childhood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 1996(74), 5–26.
McHale, J., & Lindahl, K. (2011). Coparenting: A conceptual and clinical examination of family systems. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.
McHale, J. P., & Rasmussen, J. L. (1998). Coparental and family group-level dynamics during infancy: Early family precursors of child and family functioning during preschool. Development and Psychopathology, 10(01), 39–59.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Philipp, D. A., Cordiero, K., & Hayos, C. (2018). A case-series of two-parent families receiving Reflective Family Play: Therapeutic process, feasibility, and referral characteristics. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Reiss, D. (1989). The represented and practicing family: Contrasting visions of family continuity. In A. J. Sameroff & R. N. Emde (Eds.), Relationship disturbances in early childhood (pp. 191–220). New York: Basic Books.
Stern, D. N. (2004). The present moment in psychotherapy and everyday life. New-York, NW: WW Norton & Company.
Teubert, D., & Pinquart, M. (2010). The association between coparenting and child adjustment: A meta-analysis. Parenting, 10(4), 286–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2010.492035.
Tronick, E., Als, H., & Brazelton, T. B. (1980). Monadic phases: A structural descriptive analysis of infant-mother face to face interaction. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly of Behavior and Development, 26(1), 3–24.
Funding
This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant 32-52508.97).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards and the « Commission cantonale (VD) d’éthique de la recherche sur l’être humain » gave its agreement.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The families have agreed to the use of their data with the understanding that we change identifying information to protect their anonymity. Every effort has been made to retain elements necessary to relay key teaching points.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frascarolo, F., Fivaz-Depeursinge, E. & Philipp, D. The Child and the Couple: From Zero to Fifteen. J Child Fam Stud 27, 3073–3084 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1090-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1090-8