Cumulative Bullying Experiences, Adolescent Behavioral and Mental Health, and Academic Achievement: An Integrative Model of Perpetration, Victimization, and Bystander Behavior
- 26 Downloads
Bullying is often ongoing during middle- and high-school. However, limited research has examined how cumulative experiences of victimization, perpetration, and bystander behavior impact adolescent behavioral and mental health and academic achievement outcomes at the end of high school. The current study used a sample of over 8000 middle- and high-school students (51% female; mean age 12.5 years) from the Rural Adaptation Project in North Carolina to investigate how cumulative experiences as a bullying victim and perpetrator over 5 years, and cumulative experiences of bystander behavior over 2 years impacted students’ aggression, internalizing symptoms, academic achievement, self-esteem, and future optimism. Following multiple imputation, analysis included a Structural Equation Model with excellent model fit. Findings indicate that cumulative bullying victimization was positively associated with aggression and internalizing symptoms, and negatively associated with self-esteem and future optimism. Cumulative bullying perpetration was positively associated with aggression and negatively associated with future optimism. Cumulative negative bystander behavior was positively associated with aggression and internalizing symptoms and negatively associated with academic achievement and future optimism. Cumulative prosocial bystander behavior was positively associated with internalizing symptoms, academic achievement, self-esteem, and future optimism. This integrative model brings together bullying dynamics to provide a comprehensive picture of implications for adolescent behavioral and mental health and academic achievement.
KeyWordsBullying Victimization Perpetration Bystander Behavior Adolescence
The study was funded by U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Injury Prevention and Control (5 U01 CE001948-03 and 16IPA1605209) and the Developing Knowledge About What Makes Schools Safer grant through the National Institute for Justice (NIJ-20143878). The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
C.B.R.E.: conducted the majority of the data analysis and wrote drafts of the paper. P.R.S.: conceptualized the study and collaborated on writing the paper. R.A.R.: assisted with the data analysis and collaborated on writing the paper. M.C.M.: collaborated on writing the paper. K.J.M.: collaborated on writing the paper.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
Procedures involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill approved this study.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, VT: Univ. of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth & Families.Google Scholar
- Anderson, K. B., & Graham, L. M. (2007). Hostile attribution bias. In R. F. Baumesiter & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Encyclopedia of social psychology (pp. 445–446). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (2008). The school success profile.. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
- Bowen, G. L., Rose, R. A., & Bowen, N. K. (2005). The reliability and validity of the school success profile. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris.Google Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016). Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States. MMWR Surveillance Summaries, 65(6), 1–174.Google Scholar
- Clifford, M. A. (2015). Teaching restorative practices with classroom circles. San Francisco, CA: Center for Restorative Process.Google Scholar
- Colorado Trust (2014). The Colorado trust bullying prevention initiative student survey. http://www.coloradotrust.org/atta1068_chments/0002/1691/BPI_Student_Survey_no-copyright.pdf.
- Copeland, W. E., Wolke, D., Lereya, S. T., Shanahan, L., Worthman, C., & Costello, E. J. (2014). Childhood bullying involvement predicts low-trade system inflammation into adulthood. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(21), 7570–7575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1323641111.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Crick, N. & Dodge, K. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 8, 128–131. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN/%291467-8624.Google Scholar
- David-Ferdon, C., Vivolo-Kantor, A., Dahlberg, L. L., Marshall, K., Rainford, N., & Hall, J. (2016). A Comprehensive Technical Package for the Prevention of Youth Violence and Associated Risk Behaviors. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Evans, C. B. R., Smokowski, P. R., & Cotter, K. L. (2014). Cumulative bullying victimization: An investigation of the dose response relationship between victimization and the association of mental health outcomes, social supports, and school experiences of rural adolescents. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 256–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenland, S., & Pearce, N. (2015). Statistical foundations for model-based adjustments. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031914-122559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hoyle, R. H. (2012). Introduction and overview. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 3–16). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Molnar-Main, S. (2014). Integrating bullying prevention and restorative practices in schools: Considerations for practitioners and policymakers. Center for Safe Schools. http://www.safeschools.info/content/BPRPWhitePaper2014.pdf.
- Niemela, S., Brunstein-Klomek, A., Sillanmaki, L., Helenius, H., Piha, J., Kumpulainen, K., & Sourander, A. (2011). Childhood bullying behaviors at age eight and substance use at age 18 among males: A nationwide prospective study. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 256–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.10.012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Rivara, F. & Le Menestral, S. (Eds.) (2016). Preventing bullying through science, policy, and practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Smokowski, P. R., Guo, S., Wu, Q., Evans, C. B. R., Cotter, K. L., & Bacallao, M. (2016a). Evaluating dosage effects for the positive action program: How implementation impacts internalizing symptoms, aggression, school hassles, and self-esteem. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 86(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000167.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Smokowski, P. R., Guo, S., Evans, C. B. R., Wu, Q., Rose, R. A., Bacallao, M., & Cotter, K. L. (2016b). Risk and protective factors across multiple microsystems associated with internalizing symptoms and aggressive behavior in rural adolescents: Modeling longitudinal trajectories from the Rural Adaptation Project. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000163. Online first.Google Scholar
- Smokwoski, P.R., Evans, C.B.R., Wing, H., Bower, M., Bacallao, M., & Barbee, J. (2018). Implementing school based youth courts in a rural context: Making schools safer by interrupting the school to prison pipeline. Children and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 35(2), 127–138.Google Scholar
- Ttofi, M. M., Farrington, D. P., Losel, F., & Loeber, R. (2011a). Do victims of school bullies tend to become depressed later in life? A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Journal of Aggression, Conflict, and Peace Research, 3(11), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1108/17596591111132873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yeager, D. S., Fong, C. J., Lee, H. Y., & Espelage, D. L. (2015). Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1016.j.appdev.2014.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar