Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 27, Issue 5, pp 1544–1555 | Cite as

Parental Involvement in Primary School Education: its Relationship with Children’s Academic Performance and Psychosocial Competence through Engaging Children with School

  • Rosa Sze Man Wong
  • Frederick Ka Wing Ho
  • Wilfred Hing Sang Wong
  • Keith Tsz Suen Tung
  • Chun Bong Chow
  • Nirmala Rao
  • Ko Ling Chan
  • Patrick Ip
Original Paper


The benefits of parental involvement in children’s education have been well established but increasing evidence suggests that overparenting may have adverse effects on children. The question of whether excessive parental involvement hinders children’s academic and psychosocial development warrants further investigations. This study examined the associations of parental educational involvement at home and in school with academic performance and psychological health of 507 Chinese Grade 3 schoolchildren in Hong Kong. Parents reported on their level of involvement in children’s schooling and their children’s psychosocial issues. Children were surveyed to determine their school engagement, and their Chinese language and mathematics attainment was assessed. We also explored the underlying mechanism by testing children’s engagement with school as a mediator of the relationships. Our results showed that home-based parental educational involvement was positively associated with children’s language competence and psychosocial wellbeing, and the associations were linked through engaging children with school. However, the benefits reached a plateau at higher level of parental involvement in children’s learning at home. School-based parental involvement had an indirect effect on children’s prosocial behavior through school engagement. These findings highlight the significance of optimal level of parental involvement in children’s education at home for children’s development.


Parental involvement Academic achievement Psychosocial wellbeing School engagement Child development 



This manuscript is a revision of RMSW MPhil thesis which was accepted at the University of Hong Kong in November 2015. We are grateful to the primary schools, the children and their parents who participated in this study.

Author Contributions

RSMW: conceived the study concept, designed and executed the study, and wrote the manuscript. FKWH: analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript. WHSW: executed the study, supervised data analyses, and wrote the manuscript. KTST: executed the study and wrote the manuscript. CBC: conceived the study concept, designed and executed the study, and revised the manuscript. NR: conceived the study concept and revised the manuscript. KLC: conceived the study concept and revised the manuscript. PI: conceived the study concept, designed and executed the study, and revised and proofread the manuscript.


This study was supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. 743413).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong/Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.


  1. Bao, X. H., & Lam, S. F. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79(2), 269–283.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baraldi, A. N., & Enders, C. K. (2010). An introduction to modern missing data analyses. Journal of School Psychology, 48(1), 5–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 315–342). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, J. J. L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, J. J. L., & Liu, X. (2012). The mediating role of perceived parental warmth and parental punishment in the psychological well-being of children in rural china. Social Indicators Research, 107(3), 483–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheung, C. S. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2012). Why does parents’ involvement enhance children’s achievement? The role of parent-oriented motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 820–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cicchetti, D, Toth, S. L. (2014). Internalizing and externalizing expressions of dysfunction (Vol.2). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Denham, S., & Kochanoff, A. T. (2002). Parental contributions to preschoolers’ understanding of emotion. Marriage & Family Review, 34(3-4), 311–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denham, S. A. (1986). Social cognition, prosocial behavior, and emotion in preschoolers: Contextual validation. Child Development, 57(1), 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Denham, S. A., Mitchell-Copeland, J., Strandberg, K., Auerbach, S., & Blair, K. (1997). Parental contributions to preschoolers’ emotional competence: direct and indirect effects. Motivation and Emotion, 21(1), 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denham, S. A., Workman, E., Cole, P. M., Weissbrod, C., Kendziora, K. T., & ZAHN–WAXLER, C. (2000). Prediction of externalizing behavior problems from early to middle childhood: the role of parental socialization and emotion expression. Development and Psychopathology, 12(1), 23–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Education Bureau. (2008). Learning achievement measurement Kit 2.0: user’s guide. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.Google Scholar
  16. Education Bureau. (2012). The EDB circular (EDBC012/2012) on learning support. Hong Kong: Education Bureau.Google Scholar
  17. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: a general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Englund, M. M., Luckner, A. E., Whaley, G. J., & Egeland, B. (2004). Children’s achievement in early elementary school: Longitudinal effects of parental involvement, expectations, and quality of assistance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(4), 723–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Epstein, J. L., & Salinas, K. C. (2004). Partnering with families and communities. Educational Leadership, 61(8), 12–19.Google Scholar
  20. Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. S. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 97–131). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 148–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilliom, M., & Shaw, D. S. (2004). Codevelopment of externalizing and internalizing problems in early childhood. Development and Psychopathology, 16(02), 313–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gonzales, N. A., Wong, J. J., Toomey, R. B., Millsap, R., Dumka, L. E., & Mauricio, A. M. (2014). School engagement mediates long-term prevention effects for Mexican American adolescents. Prevention Science, 15(6), 929–939.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gonzalez-DeHass, A. R., Willems, P. P., & Holbein, M. F. D. (2005). Examining the relationship between parental involvement and student motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Goodman, A., Lamping, D. L., & Ploubidis, G. B. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38(8), 1179–1191.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: a research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(4), 508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hart, S. L., Hodgkinson, S. C., Belcher, H. M. E., Hyman, C., & Cooley-Strickland, M. (2013). Somatic symptoms, peer and school stress, and family and community violence exposure among urban elementary school children. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 36(5), 454–465. Scholar
  30. Ho, E. S. C. (2003). Students’ self-esteem in an Asian educational system: The contribution of parental involvement and parental investment. School Community Journal, 13(1), 65–84.Google Scholar
  31. Ho, E. S. C., & Kwong, W. M. (2013). Parental involvement on children’s education: What works in Hong Kong. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children’s education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huber, P. J. (1967). The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability (Vol. 1, pp. 221–233). CA: Berkeley.Google Scholar
  34. Inguglia, C., Ingoglia, S., Liga, F., Lo Coco, A., & Lo Cricchio, M. G. (2015). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescence and emerging adulthood: relationships with parental support and psychological distress. Journal of Adult Development, 22(1), 1–13. Scholar
  35. Ip, P., Rao, N., Bacon-Shone, J., Li, S. L., Ho, F. K.-w, Chow, C.-b, & Jiang, F. (2015). Socioeconomic gradients in school readiness of Chinese preschool children: the mediating role of family processes and kindergarten quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 35(2), 111–123.Google Scholar
  36. Izard, C., Fine, S., Schultz, D., Mostow, A., Ackerman, B., & Youngstrom, E. (2001). Emotion knowledge as a predictor of social behavior and academic competence in children at risk. Psychological Science, 12(1), 18–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim, S. Y. (2013). Defining tiger parenting in Chinese Americans. Human Development, 56(4), 217–222.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ladd, G. W., & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190–206.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lai, K. Y., Luk, E. S., Leung, P. W., Wong, A. S., Law, L., & Ho, K. (2010). Validation of the Chinese version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Hong Kong. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45(12), 1179–1186.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Wong, B. P., Kikas, E., Shin, H., Veiga, F. H., & Negovan, V. (2014). Understanding and measuring student engagement in school: The results of an international study from 12 countries. School Psychology Quarterly, 29(2), 213–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lansford, J. E., Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2014). Mothers’ and Fathers’ Autonomy-Relevant Parenting: Longitudinal Links with Adolescents’ Externalizing and Internalizing Behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1877–1889. Scholar
  43. Lau, E. Y. H., Li, H., & Rao, N. (2011). Parental involvement and children’s readiness for school in China. Educational Research, 53(1), 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lau, E. Y. H., Li, H., & Rao, N. (2012). Exploring parental involvement in early years education in China: development and validation of the Chinese Early Parental Involvement Scale (CEPIS). International Journal of Early Years Education, 20(4), 405–421. Scholar
  45. Locke, J. Y., Campbell, M. A., & Kavanagh, D. (2012). Can a parent do too much for their child? An examination by parenting professionals of the concept of overparenting. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 22(02), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maccoby, E. E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In J. E. Grusec & H. P. D (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 13–41). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  47. MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 83–104.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Marchant, G. J., Paulson, S. E., & Rothlisberg, B. A. (2001). Relations of middle school students’ perceptions of family and school contexts with academic achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 38(6), 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maxwell, S. E., & Cole, D. A. (2007). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 23–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Parcel, T. L., & Dufur, M. J. (2001). Capital at home and at school: Effects on student achievement. Social Forces, 79(3), 881–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Perry, R. P. (2011). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 13–36). Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  52. Pettygrove, D. M., Hammond, S. I., Karahuta, E. L., Waugh, W. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2013). From cleaning up to helping out: Parental socialization and children’s early prosocial behavior. Infant Behavior and Development, 36(4), 843–846.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A., & Litwack, S. D. (2007). The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: More is not always better. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 373–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodriguez, E. T., & Tamis‐LeMonda, C. S. (2011). Trajectories of the home learning environment across the first 5 years: Associations with children’s vocabulary and literacy skills at prekindergarten. Child Development, 82(4), 1058–1075.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(6), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self‐regulation and the problem of human autonomy: does psychology need choice, self‐determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., & Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23(3), 548–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Segrin, C., Givertz, M., Swaitkowski, P., & Montgomery, N. (2015). Overparenting is associated with child problems and a critical family environment. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24(2), 470–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Seipp, B. (1991). Anxiety and academic performance: A meta-analysis of findings. Anxiety Research, 4(1), 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tam, V. C., & Chan, R. M. (2009). Parental Involvement in Primary Children’s Homework in Hong Kong. School Community Journal, 19(2), 81–100.Google Scholar
  62. Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., Moffitt, T. E., Robins, R. W., Poulton, R., & Caspi, A. (2006). Low self-esteem during adolescence predicts poor health, criminal behavior, and limited economic prospects during adulthood. Developmental Psychology, 42(2), 381–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Urdan, T. C., & Maehr, M. L. (1995). Beyond a two-goal theory of motivation and achievement: A case for social goals. Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 213–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Voelkl, K. E. (2012). School identification. Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 193–218). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang, M. T., & Sheikh‐Khalil, S. (2014). Does parental involvement matter for student achievement and mental health in high school? Child Development, 85(2), 610–625.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wood, S. (2006). Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: CRC press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosa Sze Man Wong
    • 1
  • Frederick Ka Wing Ho
    • 1
  • Wilfred Hing Sang Wong
    • 1
  • Keith Tsz Suen Tung
    • 1
  • Chun Bong Chow
    • 1
  • Nirmala Rao
    • 2
  • Ko Ling Chan
    • 3
  • Patrick Ip
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent MedicineThe University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongHong KongHong Kong
  3. 3.Department of Applied Social SciencesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongHong Kong

Personalised recommendations