Creating Novel School-Based Education Programs to Cultivate Mindfulness in Youth: What The Letters Told Us
In contemporary education, there is increasing interest in the potential of mindfulness-based training to improve mental health, behavior, and school performance, as part of fostering contemplative pedagogy that can positively impact the lives of young children. However, practice-based knowledge is lacking about how to implement mindfulness-based training effectively at schools. Thus, the key question motivating our study was how we can create school-based educational programs that cultivate mindfulness in young people. The study, a retrospective, qualitative analysis of 188 letters written by 112 elementary students who participated in a classroom-based mindfulness-based training curriculum in the mid-1990s, provided an unique opportunity for gaining important insights into ways in which the students viewed the mindfulness-based training curriculum, themselves, and each other when undertaking that training. Applying the principles of qualitative analysis, each letter was coded, and codes were constantly compared, and from this five thematic categories emerged about central aspects of the process and implementation of that mindfulness-based training. They were: (1) Importance of a sense of place; (2) We are more of a community; (3) Actively taking it on; (4) How I relate to others; and (5) Getting in touch with the inner self. A key finding is that the mindfulness-based training program was a sustained process facilitating the cultivation of a range of students’ skillsets, and not simply reduced to attentional techniques acquired in a finite time slot in an otherwise unchanging classroom. This finding has important implications for the way mindfulness-based training is conceptualized and implemented in contemporary school settings.
KeywordsMindfulness training Contemplative education Qualitative research Students Implementation programs
The authors are most grateful to 1440 Foundation, Mindfulness Connections, and HopeLabs, for their financial support of this study.
J.C.: designed and executed the study, conducted the data analyses, and wrote the paper. E.M.A.: conducted the data analyses, and assisted with the writing of the paper. D.L.L.: designed the study, assisted with the execution of the study and the writing of the paper. D.R.V.: obtained the funding for the study, collaborated with the design of the study, and assisted with editing of the paper. Y.N.: obtained the funding for the study, designed the study, and assisted with editing of the paper.
The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funders. The funders had no role in the conduct of the study, collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
This article is dedicated to the memory of Ms. A.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required. The interdisciplinary research team consisted of five researchers from various fields, including the social and health sciences, counselling psychology, neuroscience and cognitive science. The University of Utah Institutional Review Board approved all aspects of the study. The principles of confidentiality and anonymity were upheld, including the names of the school, students and teacher, and the exact location of the school.
- Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Kaiser, R. H., Turner, A. E., Reineberg, A. E., Godinez, D., & Dimidjian, S., et al. (2013). A penny for your thoughts: Dimensions of self-generated thought content and relationships with individual differences in emotional wellbeing. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 900 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Biegel, G., & Brown, K.W. (2010). Assessing the efficacy of an adapted in-class mindfulness-based training program for school-age children: A pilot study. White Paper. Available online at: http://www.mindfulschools.org/pdf/Mindful%20Schools%20Pilot%20Study%20Whitepaper.pdf.
- Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S. L., L., C., Anderson, N. D., & Carmody, J., et al. (2004). Mindfulness: A proposed operational definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11, 230–241.Google Scholar
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research in Education. An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Bostic, J. Q., Nevarez, M. D., Potter, M. P., Prince, J. B., Benningfield, M. M., & Aguirre, B. A. (2015). Being present at school: Implementing mindfulness in schools. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 24(2), 245–259. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2014.11.010.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cheek, J., Lipschitz, D. L., Abrams, E. M., Vago, D. R., & Nakamura, Y. (2015). Dynamic reflexivity in action: An armchair walkthrough of a qualitatively driven mixed-method and multiple methods study of mindfulness training in schoolchildren. Qualitative Health Research, 25(6), 751–762. doi: 10.1177/1049732315582022.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Covington, S. (2008). Helping women recover: A program for treating substance abuse Facilitator’s guide - Revised Edition for use in the criminal justice system San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Dariotis, J. K., Mirabal-Beltran, R., Cluxton-Keller, F., Gould, L. F., Greenberg, M. T., & Mendelson, T. (2016). A qualitative evaluation of student learning and skills use in a school-based mindfulness and yoga program. Mindfulness, 7(1), 76–89. doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0463-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J.-P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: The development and initial validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29, 177–190. doi: 10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fresco, D. M., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., & Kennedy, S. (2007). Relationship of posttreatment decentering and cognitive reactivity to relapse in major depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 447–455. doi:2007-07856-010 [pii] 10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.447 [doi].CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goyal, M., Singh, S., Sibinga, E. M., Gould, N. F., Rowland-Seymour, A., & Sharma, R., et al. (2014). Meditation programs for psychological stress and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine, 174(3), 357–368.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective evaluation (1st ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Gunaratana, B. H. (2002). Mindfulness in plain English. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
- Hooker, K. E., & Fodor, I. E. (2008). Teaching mindfulness to children. Gestalt Review, 12, 75–91.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: How to cope with stress, pain and illness using mindfulness meditation. London: Piatkus.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1995). Wherever You Go There You Are. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, M., & Kabat-Zinn, J. (1997). Everyday blessings: The inner work of mindful parenting. New York, NY: Hyperion.Google Scholar
- Making Sense of Place. (2014). Inc. http://www.makingsenseofplace.com/about-place.htm. Accessed 24 Dec 2014.
- Merriam, B. S. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research. A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. B. (1976). Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
- Monshat, K., Khong, B., Hassed, C., Vella-Brodrick, D., Norrish, J., & Burns, J., et al. (2013). “A conscious control over life and my emotions:” Mindfulness practice and healthy young people. A qualitative study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(5), 572–577. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Noddings, N. (2005). What does it mean to Educate the WHOLE child? Educational Leadership, 63(1), 8–13.Google Scholar
- Ospina, M. B., Bond, K., Karkhaneh, M., Tjosvold, L., Vandermeer, B., & Liang, Y., et al. (2007). Meditation practices for health: State of the research. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments, 155, 1–263.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Rempel, K. (2012). Mindfulness for children and youth: A review of the literature with an argument for school-based implementation. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 46(3), 201–220.Google Scholar
- Roeser, R. W., Vago, D. R., Pinela, C., Morris, L. S., Taylor, C., & Harrison, J. (2014). Contemplative education: Cultivating positive mental skills and social-emotional dispositions through mindfulness training. In L. Nucci, T. Krettenauer, & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Handbook of Moral and Character Education (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Wallace, D. L., & Ewald, H. R. (2000). Mutuality in the rhetoric and composition classroom. Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar