Parental Empowerment: Construct Validity and Reliability of a Dutch Empowerment Questionnaire (EMPO)
- 503 Downloads
In this study, the construct validity and reliability of the Empowerment questionnaire (EMPO) that was developed in Dutch youth care was examined. The 12-item EMPO focuses on measuring parental empowerment in raising their children. The three components of psychological empowerment (intrapersonal, interactional, and behavioral) form the rationale for the EMPO. Non-clinical (n = 673) and clinical (n = 1,212) data were used. Construct validity was tested by the factorial structure, measurement invariance, correlations with other instruments (PSQ-S and SDQ), and empowerment differences between the two groups. Reliability was determined by testing the internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The results show that the factorial validity of the EMPO was sufficient to good, the EMPO was measurement invariant for various subgroups, and the EMPO scales were negatively correlated with parenting stress (PSQ-S) and child behavioral problems scales (SDQ). Furthermore, the clinical group was less empowered, and the correlation between parental empowerment and child behavioral problems was stronger in this group. In addition, both groups of parents had relatively high scores on the interactional component. In the clinical group, however, parental scores on the interactional component were less correlated with scores on the intrapersonal and behavioral components. Finally, reliability analyses showed a largely sufficient to good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The EMPO seems to be an instrument with sufficient to good construct validity and reliability. Further research is recommended regarding the underlying assumptions, other aspects of validity, representativeness, and the way it should be used as a tool by professionals for supporting parental empowerment.
KeywordsParental empowerment Psychological empowerment Youth care Questionnaire Construct validity Reliability
We would like to thank the parents and Pactum employees (youth care) and the employees of the CONRISQ Group (care of youth and adults) for their cooperation in this study.
This study was funded by Pactum. Grant Number: n.a.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict ofinterest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2006). Robust chi square difference testing with mean and variance adjusted test statistics. Mplus Web Notes: No. 10. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/download/webnotes/webnote10.pdf.
- Bolt, A. (2006). Het Gezin Centraal, handboek voor ambulante hulpverleners [Family Centred Therapy, manual for ambulant social workers]. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
- Bot, S. (2013). Het verband tussen ervaren problemen en gebruik van geïndiceerde zorg [Relationship between experienced problems and use of indicated care]. Terecht in de jeugdzorg [Reference to youth care]. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau. Bot (red.)Google Scholar
- Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Edition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Evers, A., Lucassen, W., Meijer, R., & Sijtsma, S. (2010). COTAN Beoordelingssysteem voor de kwaliteit van tests [COTAN Assessment system for the quality of tests]. Amsterdam: NIP.Google Scholar
- Goedhart, A., Treffers, F., & Van Widenfelt, B. (2003). Vragen naar psychische problemen bij kinderen en adolescenten [Measuring psychological problems in children and adolescents]: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Maandblad Geestelijke Volksgezondheid, 58, 1018–1035.Google Scholar
- Hermanns, J., Van de Venne, L., & Leseman, P. (1997). Home-Start geëvalueerd [Home-Start evaluated]. Amsterdam: SCO-Kohnstamm Instituut.Google Scholar
- Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53–60.Google Scholar
- Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., Green, A. L., & Ferron, J. M. (2011). Supporting Parents Who Have Youth with Emotional Disturbances Through a Parent-to-Parent Support Program: A Proof of Concept Study Using Random Assignment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 412–427. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0329-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. (2013). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [Computer software]. Available from: http://quantpsy.org.
- McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). Mplus User’s Guide. Seventh Edition Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén. -2013Google Scholar
- Peterson, N. A., Lowe, J. B., Hughey, J., Reid, R. J., Zimmerman, M. A., & Speer, P. W. (2006). Measuring the intrapersonal component of psychological empowerment: Confirmatory factor analysis of the Sociopolitical Control Scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 287–297. doi: 10.1007/s10464-006-9070-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Preacher, K. J. (2002). Calculation for the test of the difference between two independent correlation coefficients [Computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org.
- Robbins, V., Johnston, J., Barnett, H., Hobstetter, W., Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A. J., & Annis, S. (2008). Parent to parent: A synthesis of the emerging literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, The Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, Department of Child & Family Studies.Google Scholar
- Schäfer, W., Kroneman, M., Boerma., W., Van den Berg, M., Westert, G., Devillé, W., & Van Ginneken, E. (2010). The Netherlands: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition, 12, 121–229.Google Scholar
- Schouten, R. (2013). Beleid ‘Eigen kracht’ door de jaren heen [‘Own strength’ policy through the years]. Utrecht: Nederlands Jeugd Instituut.Google Scholar
- Slot, N. W., & Spanjaard, H. J. M. (2009). Competentiegerichte residentiële hulp voor kinderen en adolescenten [Competence-based residential care for children and adolescents]. Baarn, Netherlands: Intro.Google Scholar
- Spanjaard, H., & Haspels, M. (2005). Families First. Handleiding voor gezinsmedewerkers (6e druk) [Families First: manual for family workers. 6th edition. Utrecht: Nederlands Jeugdinstituut.Google Scholar
- Stone, L. L., Janssens, J. M. A. M., Vermulst, A. A., Van der Mater, M., Engels, R. C., & Otten, R. (2015). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: psychometric properties of the parent and teacher version in children aged 4–7. BMC Psychology, 3, 1–12. http://www.biomedcentral.com/2050-7283/3/4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Turnell, A., & Edwards, S. (1999). ‘Signs of safety: A solution and safety oriented approach to child protection casework’. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Van Pagée, R. (2003). Eigen Kracht in Nederland: van model naar invoering [Family Group Conference in The Netherlands: from model to implementation]. Amsterdam: SWP.Google Scholar
- Van Regenmortel, T. (2009). Empowerment as challenging framework for social inclusion and modern care. Journal of Social Intervention: Theory and Practice, 18, 22–24.Google Scholar
- Vermulst, A. A., Kroes, G., De Meyer, R. E., Nguyen, L., & Veerman, J. W. (2015). Handleiding OBVL [Manual Parenting Stress Questionnaire]. Nijmegen: Praktikon.Google Scholar
- Verzaal, H. (2002). Empowerment in de jeugdzorg [Empowerment in youth care]. PhD Thesis. Amsterdam: Universiteit van Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Vuorenmaa, M., Perälä, M. L., Halme, N., Kaunonen, M., & Åstedt-Kurki, P. (2016). Associations between family characteristics and parental empowerment in the family, family service situations and the family service system. Child Care Health and Development, 42, 25–35. doi: 10.1111/cch.12267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport, E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology. New York: Kluwer academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar