Parent Involvement in Secondary Special Education and Transition: An Exploratory Psychometric Study
- 2k Downloads
An increased level of parent involvement in education has been identified as a predictor of positive postschool outcomes for students with disabilities who have traditionally experienced lower rates of employment and postsecondary education than their peers without disabilities. The purpose of this study was to explore the factor structure of scales adapted from the Hoover-Dempsey and Sandler Model of Parent Involvement that might be used to predict parent involvement in secondary special education. An iterative adaption process included adding and revising scale items to reflect parent beliefs and involvement activities related to transition planning and secondary education for parents of high school students with disabilities. Participants were 149 parents of students with disabilities, ages 16–21. Two exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the scales. Results of the EFA for involvement activities suggested a three-factor solution including: Future Planning; Home-based Involvement; and Agency/School-based Involvement. Results of the EFA for Motivators for Involvement suggested a seven-factor solution including: Parent Expectations for the Future; General School Invitations; Role Construction; Perceptions of Time and Energy; Knowledge, Skills, and Self-efficacy; Specific Child Invitations, and Specific Teacher Invitations. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
KeywordsParent involvement Secondary special education Transition planning
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- Casey Life Skills. (2012). Casey Family Programs. Seattle, WA: Retrieved from: casey.org.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1996). Family involvement in children’s and adolescents’ schooling. In A. Booth & J. Dunn (Eds.), Family–school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48(2), 90–101. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.90.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi delta kappan, 76(9), 701–712.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
- Fishman, C. E. & Nickerson, A. B. (2014). Motivations for involvement: A preliminary investigation of parents of students with disabilities. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9865-4.
- Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: A conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Gallivan-Fenlon, A. (1994). “Their senior year”: Family and service provider perspectives on the transition from school to adult life for young adults with disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19(1), 11–23.Google Scholar
- Geenan, S., Powers, L. E., & Lopez-Vasquez, A. (2001a). Multicultural aspects of parent involvement in transition planning. Exceptional Children, 67(2), 265–282.Google Scholar
- Geenan, S., Powers, L. E., Lopez-Vasquez, A., & Bersani, H. (2001b). Understanding and promoting the transition of minority adolescents. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 26(27), 27–46.Google Scholar
- Green, C. L., Walker, J. M. T., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544. doi: 10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Greenfield, M. D., Epstein, J. L., Hutchins, D. J., & Thomas, B. G. (2012). Sampler: Improve family and community involvement in high schools. National Network of Partnership Schools at Johns Hopkins University. http://www.csos.jhu.edu/p2000/PPP/Samplers/2012-High-School-Sampler.pdf.
- Hetherington, S. A., Durant-Jones, L., Johnson, K., Nolan, K., Smith, E., Taylor-Brown, S., & Tuttle, J. (2919). The lived experience of adolescents with disabilities and their parents in transition planning. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 25(3), 163–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hill, N. E., & Chao, R. K. (2009). Families, schools, and the adolescent: Connecting research, policy, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
- Hogarty, K. Y., Hines, C. V., Kromrey, J. D., Ferron, J. M., & Mumford, K. R. (2005). The quality of factor solutions in exploratory factor analysis: The influence of samples size, communality, and overdetermination. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 65, 202–226. doi: 10.1177/0013164404267287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hollifield, J. H. (1994). High schools gear up to create effective school and family partnerships. Baltimore, MD: Center on Families, Communities, Schools and Children’s Learning, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar
- Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97, 310–331.Google Scholar
- Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). Final performance report for OERI: The social context of parental involvement: A path to enhanced achievement. Presented to Project Monitor, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, March 22, 2005.Google Scholar
- IBM Corp. Released. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of (2004). P.L. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. $ 1400 et seq.Google Scholar
- Kena, G., Aud, S., Johnson, F., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Rathbun, A., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., & Kristapovich, P. (2014). The Condition of Education 2014 (NCES 2014-083). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC. http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch. Accessed 20 Apr 2015.
- Mapp, K., & Hong, S. (2010). Debunking the myth of the hard-to-reach parent. In S. L. Christensen & A. L. Reschly (Eds.), Handbook of school-family partnerships. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Mazzotti, V., Rowe, D. A., Sinclair, J., & Poppen, M. (2015). Predictors of post-school success: A systematic review of NLTS2 secondary analysis. doi: 10.1177/2165143415588047.
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide. 7. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
- National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (2003). Parent interview (part 1). http://nlts2.org.
- Newman, L. (2005). Family Involvement in the Educational Development of Youth with Disabilities. A Special Topic Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. http://www.nlts2.org/reports.
- Newman, L., Wagner, M., Knokey, A. -M., Marder, C., Nagle, K., Shaver, D., & Wei, X. (2011). The post-high school outcomes of young adults with disabilities up to 8 years after high school: A report from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). Ncser 2011-3005. National Center for Special Education Research.Google Scholar
- Qualtrics. Version (2013). Provo, UT.: AuthorGoogle Scholar
- Rumberger, R. W., Ghatak, R., Poulos, G., Ritter, P. L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1990). Family influences on dropout behavior in one california high school. Sociology of Education, 283–299.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics of the social sciences (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Test, D., Mazzotti, V., Mustian, A., Fowler, C., Krtering, L., & Kohler, P. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 32(3), 160–181. doi: 10.1177/0885728809346960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, B., Brown, T., & Onsman, A. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis: A five-step guide for novices. Australian Journal of Paramedicine, 8, 1–13.Google Scholar
- Zumbo, B. D., Gadermann, A. M., & Zeisser, C. (2007). Ordinal versions of coefficients alpha and theta for Likert rating scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6, 21–29.Google Scholar