Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 2972–2986 | Cite as

Gender Differences in Parental Images and Intimate Relationships: A Northern Finland Sample

  • Annukka A. I. Kiviniemi
  • Hanna P. Heikkinen
  • Heli-Tuulie J. Koivumaa-Honkanen
  • Ole Wasz-Höckert
  • Leila K. Seitamo
  • Irma K. Moilanen
  • Hanna E. Ebeling
Original Paper

Abstract

One of the most important components of the developmental environment is the emotional atmosphere. Childhood experiences and perceptions of parental roles and behavior result in memory models and images, which may affect the children’s relationships in adulthood. In the present study, the cross-sectional associations between childhood parental images and the quality of current intimate adult relationships were studied in a sub-study of a mother–child follow-up in northern Finland. The data were collected with a questionnaire mailed to 28–29-year-old adults, with a total of 337 replies. The present study included those respondents (N = 253) who were married or cohabiting (153 women, 100 men). Since offspring can be affected by gender-specific parenting patterns, the analyses were made separately for both genders. In women, supportiveness in both maternal and paternal images was associated with a balanced intimate relationship, the latter also being associated with a loving relationship and providing protection against quarrelsome and repressive–submissive aspects of the relationship. In men, maternal supportiveness was linked with a balanced and loving intimate relationship and protected against a quarrelsome relationship. Paternal domination was associated with repressive–submissive relationships regardless of gender. In conclusion, the qualities of recalled childhood parenting are important to adult well-being in intimate relationships in a gender-specific manner. The specific importance of the father to the children’s later life was also observed. This would indicate that supporting the relationship of the child with both parents is equally important for professionals working with children and families.

Keywords

Gender differences Family-of-origin experiences Parent–child relationship Parental images Intimate relationship 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Gyllenberg Foundation for grants to Hanna Ebeling and Annukka Kiviniemi, to the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District, the Finnish Cultural Foundation, and the Finnish Institute of Psychological Association and the Lisa Andström Foundation for grants to Annukka Kiviniemi. We would also like to thank Dr. Susanna Räinä MD, Ph.D., for her comments on the manuscript.

Funding

The Ethical Committee of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District in Finland approved the study.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. The American Psychologist, 44(4), 709–716.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Arrindell, W. A., Akkerman, A., Bagés, N., Feldman, L., Caballo, V. E., Oei, T. P., et al. (2005). The short-EMBU in Australia, Spain, and Venezuela. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21(1), 56–66. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.21.1.56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrindell, W. A., Sanavio, E., Aguilar, G., Sica, C., Hatzichristou, C., Eisemann, M., et al. (1999). The development of a short form of the EMBU: Its appraisal with students in Greece, Guatemala, Hungary and Italy. Personality and Individual Differences, 27(4), 613–628. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00192-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, K. (1997). Adult attachment processes: Individual and couple perspectives. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 70(3), 249–263. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1997.tb01903.x.Google Scholar
  6. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belsky, J., & Rovine, M. J. (1988). Nonmaternal care in the first year of life and the security of infant–parent attachment. Child Development, 59(1), 157–167. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.ep10514136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and loss: Attachment (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Separation (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1977). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. I. Aetiology and psychopathology in the light of attachment theory. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 130(3), 201–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Beach, S. R. (2000). Research on the nature and determinants of marital satisfaction: A decade in review. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 964–980. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00964.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braungart-Rieker, J., Courtney, S., & Garwood, M. M. (1999). Mother– and father–infant attachment: Families in context. Journal of Family Psychology, 13(4), 535–553. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.13.4.535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassidy, J. (2000). Adult romantic attachments: A developmental perspective on individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 111–131. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, G., & Chung, J. (1994). The impact of confucianism on organizational communication. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 93–105. doi: 10.1080/01463379409369919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohn, D. A., Silver, D. H., Cowan, C. P., Cowan, P. A., & Pearson, J. (1992). Working models of childhood attachment and couple relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 13(4), 432–449. doi: 10.1177/019251392013004003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Collins, N. L., & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(4), 644–663. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Conger, R. D., Cui, M., Bryant, C. M., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2000). Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 224. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.2.224.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55(1), 34–43. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Diener, E., Oishi, S., & Lucas, R. E. (2003). Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: Emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 403–425. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falcke, D., Wagner, A., & Mosmann, C. P. (2008). The relationship between family-of-origin and marital adjustment for couples in brazil. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 19(2), 170–186. doi: 10.1080/08975350801905020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fincham, F. D., & Bradbury, T. N. (1987). The assessment of marital quality: A reevaluation. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49(4), 797–809. doi: 10.2307/351973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fincham, F. D., & Linfield, K. J. (1997). A new look at marital quality: Can spouses feel positive and negative about their marriage? Journal of Family Psychology, 11(4), 489–502. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.11.4.489-502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fingerman, K. L. (2001). Aging mothers and their adult daughters: A study in mixed emotions., Springer series, focus on women New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Fowers, B. J. (1991). His and her marriage: A multivariate study of gender and marital satisfaction. Sex Roles, 24(3), 209–221. doi: 10.1007/BF00288892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gleason, J. B. (1987). Sex differences in parent–child interaction. In S. U. Philips, S. Steele, & C. Tanz (Eds.), Language, gender, and sex in comparative perspective (pp. 189–199). Cambridge, England; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 511–524. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0501_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henry, N. J., Berg, C. A., Smith, T. W., & Florsheim, P. (2007). Positive and negative characteristics of marital interaction and their association with marital satisfaction in middle-aged and older couples. Psychology and Aging, 22(3), 428–441. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.3.428.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson, J. B., Miller, R. B., Oka, M., & Henry, R. G. (2014). Gender differences in marital satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(1), 105–129. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnsrud, L. K. (1995). Korean academic women: Multiple roles, multiple challenges. Higher Education, 30(1), 17–35. doi: 10.1007/BF01384051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kiecolt-Glaser, J. K., & Newton, T. L. (2001). Marriage and health: His and hers. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 472–503. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.472.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kinnunen, U., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Childhood socio-emotional characteristics as antecedents of marital stability and quality. European Psychologist, 8(4), 223–237. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.8.4.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kiviniemi, A., Wasz-Höckert, O., Seitamo, L., Joskitt, L., Heikkinen, H., Moilanen, I., et al. (2011). The association between parental images and satisfaction in intimate relationship in a northern Finland sample. International Journal of Circumpolar Health, 70(2), 215–227. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v70i2.17805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kujala, E. (2003). Boys of the war: Childhood experiences of little wartime boys from the perspective of fatherhood. [Sodan pojat: Sodanaikaisten pikkupoikien lapsuuskokemuksia isyyden näkökulmasta] (Dissertation). Retrieved from https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/bitstream/handle/123456789/13364/9513915352.pdf.
  36. Lawrence, E., Barry, R. A., Brock, R. L., Bunde, M., Langer, A., Ro, E., et al. (2011). The relationship quality interview: Evidence of reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and incremental utility. American Psychological Association, 23(1), 44–63. doi: 10.1037/a0021096.Google Scholar
  37. Lee, K. S., & Ono, H. (2012). Marriage, cohabitation, and happiness: A cross-national analysis of 27 countries. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 953–972. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levin, K. A., & Currie, C. (2010). Family structure, mother–child communication, father–child communication, and adolescent life satisfaction: A cross-sectional multilevel analysis. Health Education, 110(3), 152–168. doi: 10.1108/09654281011038831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lovas, G. S. (2005). Gender and patterns of emotional availability in mother–toddler and father–toddler dyads. Infant Mental Health Journal, 26(4), 327–353. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Main, M. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of attachment organization: Recent studies, changing methodologies, and the concept of conditional strategies. Human Development, 33(1), 48–61. doi: 10.1159/000276502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood, and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 50(1–2), 66–104. doi: 10.2307/3333827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Männikkö, K. (2001). Adult attachment styles: A person-oriented approach. https://jyx.jyu.fi/dspace/handle/123456789/41328.
  43. Matias, C., O’Connor, T. G., Futh, A., & Scott, S. (2014). Observational attachment theory-based parenting measures predict children’s attachment narratives independently from social learning theory-based measures. Attachment and Human Development, 16(1), 77–92. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2013.851333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCarthy, G., & Maughan, B. (2010). Negative childhood experiences and adult love relationships: The role of internal working models of attachment. Attachment and Human Development, 12(5), 445–461. doi: 10.1080/14616734.2010.501968.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McLaughlin, B., Schutz, C., & White, D. (1980). Parental speech to five-year-old children in a game-playing situation. Child Development, 51(2), 580–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ng, K. M., Loy, J. T. C., Gudmunson, C. G., & Cheong, W. N. (2009). Gender differences in marital and life satisfaction among chinese malaysians. Sex Roles, 60(1), 33–43. doi: 10.1007/s11199-008-9503-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nickerson, A. B., & Nagle, R. J. (2004). The influence of parent and peer attachments on life satisfaction in middle childhood and early adolescence. Quality-of-life research on children and adolescents (pp. 35–60). Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1177/0272431604274174.Google Scholar
  48. Official Statistics of Finland. (2013). Official Statistics of Finland (OSF): Families [e-publication]. ISSN = 1798-3231. Helsinki: Statistics Finland [Referred: 8 January 2015]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2012/02/index_en.html.
  49. Paquette, D. (2004). Theorizing the father–child relationship: Mechanisms and developmental outcomes. Human Development, 47(4), 193–219. doi: 10.1159/000078723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  51. Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Linndström, H., Knorring, L. V., & Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory for assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61(4), 265–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1980.tb00581.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pulkkinen, L. (1994). What kind of children growing the present study recommends [Millaista lastenkasvatusta nykytutkimus suosittelee]. In J. Virkki (Ed.), From the nuclear family to the individualistic families [Ydinperheestä yksilöllistyviin perheisiin] (pp. 26–45). Juva: WSOY.Google Scholar
  53. Pulkkinen, L. (1996). Growing up to adulthood [Kasvaminen aikuiseksi]. In L. Pulkkinen (Ed.), From childhood to adulthood [Lapsesta aikuiseksi]. Jyväskylä: Atena.Google Scholar
  54. Pulkkinen, L. (2002). Nice together: Initial social capital and the child’s socioemotional development [Mukavaa yhdessä: Sosiaalinen alkupääoma ja lapsen sosiaalinen kehitys]. Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.Google Scholar
  55. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J., Pott, M., Miyake, K., & Morelli, G. (2000). Attachment and culture: Security in the United States and Japan. American Psychologist, 55(10), 1093–1104. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.10.1093.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sabatelli, R. M., & Bartle-Haring, S. (2003). Family-of-origin experiences and adjustment in married couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 65(1), 159–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2003.00159.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seitamo, L., Lammi, A., & Wasz-Höckert, O. (1979). Mother’s response to her newborn baby. In L. Carenza & L. Zichella (Eds.), Emotion and reproduction (B ed., Vol. 20, pp. 1177–1183). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. Seitamo, L., & Wasz-Höckert, O. (1981). Early mother–child relationship in the light of infant cry studies. Acta Paedopsychiatrica, 47(4), 215–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Shek, D. T. L. (1995). Gender differences in marital quality and well-being in Chinese married adults. Sex Roles, 32(11), 699–715. doi: 10.1007/BF01560185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Strait, J. G., Sandberg, J. G., Larson, J. H., & Harper, J. M. (2013). The relationship between family-of-origin experiences and sexual satisfaction in married couples. Journal of Family Therapy, 37(3), 361–387. doi: 10.1111/1467-6427.12007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Topham, G. L., Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (2005). Family-of-origin predictors of hostile conflict in early marriage. Contemporary Family Therapy, 27(1), 101–121. doi: 10.1007/s10591-004-1973-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Umberson, D., Williams, K., Powers, D. A., Liu, H., & Needham, B. (2005). Stress in childhood and adulthood: Effects on marital quality over time. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(5), 1332–1347.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Sagi-Schwartz, A. (2008). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: Universal and contextual dimensions. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed., pp. 880–905). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  64. Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Zakalik, R. A. (2004). Cultural equivalence of adult attachment across four ethnic groups: Factor structure, structured means, and associations with negative mood. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 408–417. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.51.4.408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Welch, R. D., & Houser, M. E. (2010). Extending the four-category model of adult attachment: An interpersonal model of friendship attachment. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27(3), 351–366. doi: 10.1177/0265407509349632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Annukka A. I. Kiviniemi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hanna P. Heikkinen
    • 3
  • Heli-Tuulie J. Koivumaa-Honkanen
    • 4
    • 5
  • Ole Wasz-Höckert
    • 2
  • Leila K. Seitamo
    • 2
  • Irma K. Moilanen
    • 2
    • 6
  • Hanna E. Ebeling
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.PEDEGO Research UnitUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.PEDEGO Research UnitChild Psychiatry, University of OuluOuluFinland
  3. 3.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  4. 4.Institute of Clinical Medicine, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
  5. 5.Departments of PsychiatryUniversity Hospital of KuopioKuopioFinland
  6. 6.Clinic of Child PsychiatryOulu University HospitalOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations