Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 25, Issue 8, pp 2636–2647 | Cite as

Young Children’s Tablet Use and Associations with Maternal Well-Being

  • Tiffany A. PempekEmail author
  • Brandon T. McDaniel
Original Paper

Abstract

While recent research has documented a rapid increase in the use of new technologies such as touchscreen tablets early in life, little is known about how young children use tablets, what activities they engage in, and whether family demographic and maternal well-being are associated with early use. Guided by Bronfenbrenner’s bioecological theory of human development, the current study addressed these questions with a cross-sectional, online survey of mothers with children between 12 and 48 months of age. Mothers reported on their child’s tablet use as well as their own personal well-being (depressive symptoms and role overload) and relational well-being (relationship satisfaction, coparenting quality, conflict frequency). Nearly 63 % of all mothers owned a tablet. Approximately 46 % of children with access typically use a tablet in an average day, with the majority using for 15 min or less. For families who owned a tablet, child’s frequency of use was positively associated with child’s age and mother’s use and negatively associated with mother’s relational well-being. Despite the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendation that screen media be avoided for children under 24 months, children in our study used tablets, albeit infrequently. Our findings suggest that it is important for researchers to consider the relationship between contextual factors within the family and child media use. Refining their focus for families with particular needs may allow child advocates and policy makers to develop more beneficial media recommendations for families with a variety of circumstances.

Keywords

Child media use Child tablet use Touchscreens Child app use 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Dr. Heather L. Kirkorian for her helpful comments on an early version of this manuscript. We would also like to thank the parents who participated in our survey. The data used for this manuscript are based on a larger dataset on media use and well-being in women who were married or living with a partner. Tiffany Pempek and Brandon McDaniel both had full access to the data used in this study and take responsibility for the accuracy of the data analyses. Brandon McDaniel collected the data used for this study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no interests that might be interpreted as influencing the research.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2011). Media use by children younger than 2 years. Pediatrics, 128, 1040–1045. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics. (2013). Children, adolescents, and the media. Pediatrics, 132, 958–961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand, S., & Krosnick, J. A. (2005). Demographic predictors of media use among infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 539–561. doi: 10.1177/0002764204271512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, D. R., Field, D. E., Collins, P. A., Lorch, E. P., & Nathan, J. G. (1985). Estimates of young children’s time with television: A methodological comparison of parent reports with time-lapse video home observation. Child Development, 56, 1345–1357.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, D. R., & Hanson, K. G. (2010). From blooming, buzzing confusion to media literacy: The early development of television viewing. Developmental Review, 30, 239–255. doi: 10.1016/j.dr.2010.03.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, D. R., Huston, A. C., Schmitt, K. L., Linebarger, D. L., & Wright, J. C. (2001). Early childhood television viewing and adolescent behavior: The recontact study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68, 1–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, D. R., & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist January, 48, 505–522, doi: 10.1177/0002764204271506.
  8. Barr, R. (2013). Memory constraints on infant learning from picture books, television, and touchscreens. Child Development Perspectives, 7, 205–210. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barr, R., & Hayne, H. (1999). Developmental changes in imitation from television during infancy. Child Development, 70, 1067–1081.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bleakley, A., Jordan, A. B., & Hennessy, M. (2013). The relationship between parents’ and children’s television viewing. Pediatrics, 132(2), e364–e371. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). Ecological models of human development. In M. Gauvain & M. Cole (Eds.), Readings on the development of children (2nd ed., pp. 37–43). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
  13. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (1998). The ecology of developmental processes. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (5th ed., pp. 993–1023). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2006). The bioecological model of human development. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 1: Theoretical models of human development (6th ed., pp. 793–828). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, A., Shifrin, D. L., & Hill, D. L. (2015). Beyond ‘turn it off’: How to advise families on media use. AAP News, 36(10), 54. doi: 10.1542/aapnews.20153610-54.Google Scholar
  16. Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50, 308–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00308.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dodson, E. S., McClane, A. A., & Pempek, T. A. (2015). Infants, toddlers, and touchscreens: A descriptive study of early touchscreen use and parent attitudes. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the society for research in child development, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  18. Feinberg, M. E., Brown, L. D., & Kan, M. L. (2012). A multi-domain self-report measure of coparenting. Parenting: Science and Practice, 12, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/15295192.2012.638870.
  19. Fenstermacher, S. K., Barr, R., Salerno, K., Garcia, A., Shwery, C. E., Calvert, S. L., & Linebarger, D. L. (2010). Infant-directed media: An analysis of product information and claims. Infant and Child Development, 19, 557–576. doi: 10.1002/icd.718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrison, M. M., & Christakis, D. A. (2005). A teacher in the living room?: Educational media for babies, toddlers, and preschoolers. Menlo Park, CA: The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Hayne, H., Herbert, J., & Simock, G. (2003). Imitation from television by 24- and 30-month olds. Developmental Science, 6, 254–261. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kabali, H. K., Irigoyen, M. M., Nunez-Davis, R., Budacki, J. G., Mohanty, S. H., Leister, K. P., & Bonner, R. L. (2015). Exposure and use of mobile media devices by young children. Pediatrics. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-2151.
  23. Kirkorian, H. L., Choi, K., & Pempek, T. A. (2016). Toddlers’ word learning from contingent and non-contingent video on touchscreens. Child Development, 87, 405–413. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12508.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirkorian, H. L., & Pempek, T. A. (2013). Toddlers and touch screens: Potential for early learning? Zero to Three, 33, 32–37.Google Scholar
  25. Kuhl, P. K., Tsao, F., & Liu, H. (2003). Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 9096–9101. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1532872100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lauricella, A. R., Pempek, T. A., Barr, R., & Calvert, S. (2010). Contingent computer interactions for young children’s object retrieval success. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2010.06.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lauricella, A. R., Wartella, E., & Rideout, V. J. (2015). Young children’s screen time: The complex role of parent and child factors. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 36, 11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, S., Bartolic, S., & Vandewater, E. A. (2009). Predicting children’s media use in the USA: Differences in cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 123–143. doi: 10.1348/026151008X401336.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Norton, R. (1983). Measuring marital quality: A critical look at the dependent variable. Journal of Marriage and Family, 45, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parish-Morris, J., Mahajan, N., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Collins, M. F. (2013). Once upon a time: Parent–child dialogue and storybook reading in the electronic era. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 200–211. doi: 10.1111/mbe.12028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reilly, M. D. (1982). Working wives and convenience consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 8, 407–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rideout, V. J. (2011). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America. Retrieved from www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-eight-childrens-media-use-america.
  34. Rideout, V. J. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America 2013: A Common Sense Media research study. Retrieved from www.commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013#.
  35. Roseberry, S., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2014). Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Development, 85, 956–970. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Schuler, C., Levine, Z., & Ree, J. (2012). iLearn II: An analysis of the educational category of Apple’s App Store. Joan Ganz Cooney Center. Retrieved from www.joanganzcooneycenter.org/upload_kits/ilearnii.pdf.
  37. Takacs, Z. K., Swart, E. K., & Bus, A. G. (2015). Benefits and pitfalls of multimedia and interactive features in technology-enhanced storybooks: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research,. doi: 10.3102/0034654314566989.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Troseth, G. L., & DeLoache, J. S. (1998). The medium can obscure the message: Young children’s understanding of video. Child Development, 69, 950–965. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06153.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Troseth, G. L., Saylor, M. M., & Archer, A. H. (2006). Young children’s use of video as a source of socially relevant information. Child Development, 77, 786–799.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vandewater, E. A., & Bickham, D. S. (2004). The impact of educational television on young children’s reading in the context of family stress. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 25, 717–728. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2004.09.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vandewater, E. A., & Lee, S. J. (2009). Measuring children’s media use in the digital age: Issues and challenges. American Behavioral Scientist, 52, 1152–1176. doi: 10.1177/0002764209331539.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Lauricella, A., & Connell, S. (2013). Parenting in the age of digital technology: A national survey. Report of the center on media and human development, school of communication, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
  43. Zickuhr, K. (2013). Tablet ownership 2013. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. Retrieved from www.pewinternet.org/2013/06/10/tablet-ownership-2013/.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHollins UniversityRoaonkeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations