What Parents Do When Children are Good: Parent Reports of Strategies for Reinforcing Early Childhood Prosocial Behaviors
- 1.2k Downloads
This exploratory study utilized a concurrent triangulation mixed methods design to investigate how parents respond to considerate and engaging forms of children’s prosocial behavior, whether some prosocial behaviors are more likely to receive reinforcement, and whether reinforcement is associated with specific types of prosocial behavior. Parents of 74 preschoolers completed a questionnaire regarding their child’s general prosociality, provided open-ended responses to prosocial vignettes, and completed a questionnaire assessing reinforcement. Open-ended responses showed reinforcement was highly variable across parents and prosocial behaviors. Across open-ended and response-option formats, social reinforcement responses of parent approval, character attributions, and showing love emerged as common reinforcement responses to prosocial behavior, and evidencing similar relationships with comforting and cooperating behaviors. These results suggest that there are multiple ways parents respond to child prosocial behaviors, many of which seem to be attempts to encourage prosociality.
KeywordsProsocial behavior Parents/parenting Social learning Reinforcement Parent–child communication Mixed methods
- Batson, C. D., & Powell, A. A. (2003). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon, M. J. Lerner, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), The handbook of psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 463–484)., Personality and social psychology Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Carlo, G. (2006). Care-based and altruistically based morality. In M. Killen & J. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 551–579). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Catania, A. C. (2007). Learning, fourth interim edition. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 209–240). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Dodge, K. A. (1983). Behavioral antecedents of peer social status. Child Development, 54(6), 1386–1399. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1129802.
- Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 70, 1360–1372. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org.leo.lib.unomaha.edu/stable/1132312.
- Grusec, J. E., Davidov, M., & Lundell, L. (2002). Prosocial and helping behavior. In P. K. Smith & C. H. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of childhood social development (pp. 457–474). Boston: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Hallgren, K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychology, 1, 23–34.Google Scholar
- Hastings, P. D., Utendale, W. T., & Sullivan, C. (2007b). The socialization of prosocial development. In J. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 638–664). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Henderlong, J. (2000). Beneficial and detrimental effects of praise on children’s motivation: Performance versus person feedback. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
- Hoffman, M. L. (1970). Moral development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child development (pp. 261–359). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Locke, L. (2003). Parenting interactions and prosocial behavior in young children. Dissertation Abstracts International. 63(7-B), p. 3477.Google Scholar
- Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52. doi: 10.1037/0022-35126.96.36.199.
- Parke, R. D. & Buriel, R. (2006). Socialization in the family, ethnic and ecological perspectives. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th edn, pp. 429–504). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2006). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner, & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th edn., pp. 571–645). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Smith, K. (1995). Positive reinforcement a proactive intervention for the classroom. Minneapolis, MN: Institute on Community Integration. Retrieved from http://www.cehd.umn.edu/ceed/publications/tipsheets/preschoolbehavior/posrein.pdf.
- Strayer, J. (1985). Child Rating Questionnaire. Unpublished manuscript, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC.Google Scholar
- Thompson, R. A., & Goodvin, R. (2005). The individual child: Temperament, emotion, self, and personality. In M. H. Bornstein & M. E. Lamb (Eds.), Developmental Science (5th ed., pp. 391–428). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar