Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 3742–3756 | Cite as

The Perceived Role of Parental Support and Pressure in the Interplay of Test Anxiety and School Engagement Among Adolescents: Evidence for Gender-Specific Relations

  • Diana Raufelder
  • Frances Hoferichter
  • Tobias Ringeisen
  • Nicola Regner
  • Christina Jacke
Original Paper

Abstract

Although there has been an increasing amount of research conducted on test anxiety in adolescence, little is known about the relation of test anxiety and school engagement. The current study addresses this gap by focusing on the potential gender-specific interplay of test anxiety and school engagement among adolescents, testing the role of parental support and parental pressure as mediators in this association. We performed latent multigroup structural equation modeling on a sample of 7th and 8th graders (N = 1088; MAge = 13.7 years; SD = .53) in secondary schools in Brandenburg, Germany. The results suggest that there are gender differences in the interplay of test anxiety, perceived socio-academic parental support and pressure, and school engagement. Whereas girls’ school engagement is more centered on the mother figure, for boys both parents seem to play an essential role concerning their school engagement as well as test anxiety.

Keywords

Test anxiety Parental support Parental pressure School engagement Gender differences Adolescence 

References

  1. Aiken, L. S., Stein, J. A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Structural equation analyses of clinical subpopulation differences and comparative treatment outcomes: Characterizing the daily lives of drug addicts. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 488–499. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.62.3.488.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alpert, R., & Haber, R. N. (1960). Anxiety in academic achievement situations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 10, 207–215. doi:10.1037/h0045464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asparouhov, T. (2005). Sampling weights in latent variable modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 12, 37–41. doi:10.1073/pnas.0910967107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azzam, A. (2008). Engaged and on track. Educational Leadership, 65(6), 93–95.Google Scholar
  5. Bedard, K., & Cho, I. (2010). Early gender test score gaps across OECD countries. Economics of Education Review, 29, 348–363. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bembenutty, H. (2007). Self-regulation of learning and academic delay of gratification: Gender and ethnic differences among college students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 586–616. doi:10.4219/jaa-2007-553.Google Scholar
  7. Berndt, T. J., & Miller, K. E. (1990). Expectancies, values, and achievement in junior high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 319–326. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.2.319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besharat, M. A. (2003). Parental perfectionism and children’s test anxiety. Psychological Reports, 93, 1049–1055. doi:10.2466/PR0.93.8.1049-1055.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowen, G. L., Rose, R. A., Powers, J. D., & Glennie, E. J. (2008). The joint effects of neighborhoods, schools, peers, and families on change in the school success of middle school students. Family Relations, 57, 504–516. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2008.00518.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Bryan, A., Schmiege, S. J., & Broaddus, M. R. (2007). Mediational analysis in HIV/AIDS research: Estimating multivariate path analytic models in a structural equation modeling framework. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 365–383. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9150-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 270–295. doi:10.1006/ceps.2001.1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chan, D. (2009). So why ask me? Are self-report data really that bad? In C. E. Lance & R. J. Vandenberg (Eds.), Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends (pp. 309–336). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Cheung, C. S., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2011). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning in the United States and China: Implications for children’s academic and emotional functioning. Child Development, 82, 932–950. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01582.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Christenson, S. L., & Sheridan, S. M. (2001). School and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Davis, M. C., Burleson, M. H., & Kruszewski, D. M. (2011). Gender: Its relationship to stressor exposure, cognitive appraisal, coping processes, stress responses, and health outcomes. In R. J. Contrada & A. Baum (Eds.), The handbook of stress science: Biology, psychology, and health (pp. 247–267). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. di Maria, F., & di Nuovo, S. (1990). Gender differences in social and test anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 525–530. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90066-Z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dimitrov, D. M. (2006). Comparing groups on latent variables: A structural equation modeling approach. WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 26, 429–436.Google Scholar
  20. Dotterer, A. M., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 1649–1660. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Dusek, J. B., & Danko, M. (1994). Adolescent coping style and perceptions of parental child rearing. Journal of Adolescent Research, 9, 412–426. doi:10.1177/074355489494002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement-related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  23. Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. doi:10.1080/00461520902832368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinber (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 404–434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Egan, S. K., & Perry, D. G. (2001). Gender identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for psychosocial adjustment. Developmental Psychology, 37, 451–463. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.451.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628–644. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Englund, M. M., Egeland, B., & Collings, W. A. (2008). Exceptions to high school dropout predictions in a low-income sample: Do adults make a difference. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 77–93. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00549.x.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 702–712. doi:10.1177/003172171009200326.Google Scholar
  29. Fall, A., & Roberts, G. (2012). High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 787–798. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2011.11.004.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Finlay, K. A., & Heilbrunn, J. Z. (2006). Re-engaging youth in school evaluation of model demonstration truancy programs (Final evaluation report: Gulfton truancy reduction demonstration project, Houston, TX). Denver, CO: National Center for School Engagement, The Colorado Foundation for Families and Children.Google Scholar
  31. Finn, J. D., & Voelkl, K. E. (1993). School characteristics related to school engagement. Journal of Negro Education, 62, 249–268. doi:10.2307/2295464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ginsburg, G. S., & Bronstein, P. (1993). Family factors related to children’s intrinsic/extrinsic motivational orientation and academic performance. Child Development, 64, 1461–1474. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02964.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Greco, L. A., & Morris, T. L. (2002). Parental child-rearing style and child social anxiety: Investigation of child perceptions and actual father behavior. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 259–267. doi:10.1023/A:1020779000183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hembree, R. (1988). Correlates, causes, and treatment of test anxiety. Review of Educational Research, 58, 47–77. doi:10.3102/00346543058001047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hock, M. (1992). Exchange of aversive communicative acts between mother and child as related to perceived child-rearing practices and anxiety of the child. In K. Hagtvet & T. Johnsen (Eds.), Advances in test anxiety research (Vol. 7, pp. 156–174). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
  37. Hoferichter, F., & Raufelder, D. (2013). Examining the role of social relationships in the association between neuroticism and test anxiety—Results from a study with German secondary school students. Educational Psychology. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.849326.Google Scholar
  38. Holmlund, H., & Krister, S. (2008). Is the gender gap in school performance affected by the sex of the teacher? Labour Economics, 15, 37–53. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2006.12.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structural analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levpušček, M. P., & Zupančič, M. (2009). Math achievement in early adolescence: The role of parental involvement, teacher’s behavior, and students’ motivational beliefs about math. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 541–570. doi:10.1177/0272431608324189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levpušček, M. P., Zupančič, M., & Sočan, G. (2012). Predicting achievement in mathematics in adolescent students: The role of individual and social factors. Journal of Early Adolescence, 33, 523–551. doi:10.1177/0272431612450949.Google Scholar
  42. Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47, 233–247. doi:10.1037/a0021307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Luis, T. M., Varela, R. E., & Moore, K. W. (2008). Parenting practices and childhood anxiety reporting in Mexican, Mexican American, and European American families. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 22, 1011–1020. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2007.11.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lytton, H., & Romney, D. M. (1991). Parents’ differential socialization of boys and girls: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 267–296. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Macher, D., Paechter, M., Papousek, I., & Ruggeri, K. (2012). Statistics anxiety, trait anxiety, learning behavior, and academic performance. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 483–498. doi:10.1007/s10212-011-0090-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  47. Marcia, J. (1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159–187). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Martin, K. A. (1996). Puberty, sexuality, and the self: Girls and boys at adolescence. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Martin, A. J. (2001). The Student Motivation Scale: A tool for measuring and enhancing motivation. Australian Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  50. Murray, C. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 376–404. doi:10.1177/0272431608322940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2013). Mplus user’s guide (7th edn). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  52. Nawrotzki, K. D. (2012). Parent–school relations in England and the USA: Partnership, problematized. In M. Richter & S. Andresen (Eds.), The politicization of parenthood: Shifting private and public responsibilities in education and child rearing (pp. 69–83). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peleg-Popko, O., & Klingman, A. (2002). Family environment, discrepencies between perceived actual and desirable environment, and children’s test and trait anxiety. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 30, 451–466. doi:10.1080/0306988021000025646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Perdue, O., & Spielberger, C. D. (1966). Anxiety and the perception of punishment. Mental Hygiene, 50, 390–397.Google Scholar
  55. Petermann, F., & Winkel, S. (2007). FLM 7-13 Fragebogen zur Leistungsmotivation für Schüler der 7. bis 13. Klasse [FLM 7-13 Questionnaire of achievement motivation for students from 7th to 13th grade] (Vol. 2007). Frankfurt a.M: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  56. Pomerantz, E. M., Altermatt, E. R., & Saxon, J. L. (2002). Making the grade but feeling distressed: Gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 396–404. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Putwain, D. W., Woods, K. A., & Symes, W. (2009). Do teachers and parents influence a students’ tendency to perceive examinations as threatening?. Manchester: Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  58. Putwain, D. W., Woods, K. A., & Symes, W. (2010). Personal and situational predictors of test anxiety of students in post compulsory education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 137–160. doi:10.1348/000709909X466082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Reitzle, M., Metzke, C. W., & Steinhausen, H.-C. (2001). Eltern und Kinder: Der Zürcher Kurzfragebogen zum Erziehungsverhalten (ZKE). [Parents and children: The Zürich Questionnaire of educational behavior (ZKE)]. Diagnostica, 47, 196–207. doi:10.1026//0012-1924.47.4.196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Richards, A., French, C. C., Calder, A. J., Webb, B., Fox, R., & Young, A. W. (2002). Anxiety-related bias in the classification of emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. Emotion, 2, 273–287. doi:10.1037//1528-3542.2.3.273.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rost, D. H., & Schermer, F. J. (2006). Leistungsängstlichkeit. [Test anxiety]. In D. H. Rost (Ed.), Handwörterbuch Pädagogische Psychologie (pp. 404–415). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.Google Scholar
  62. Rueger, S. U., Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2010). Relationship between multiple sources of perceived social support and psychological and academic adjustment in early adolescence: Comparisons across gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 47–61. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9368-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Salmela-Aro, K., & Upadyaya, K. (2014). School burnout and engagement in the context of demands-resources model. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(1), 137–151. doi:10.1111/bjep.12018.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to Tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929–938. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.929.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514. doi:10.1007/BF02296192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shadach, E., & Ganor-Miller, O. (2013). The role of perceived parental over-involvement in student test anxiety. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 28, 585–596. doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0131-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422–445. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Simons-Morton, B., & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society, 41, 3–25. doi:10.1177/0044118X09334861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781. doi:10.1037/a0012840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Perle, J. G., & Perry, D. G. (2007). Attachment and gender identity in middle childhood. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  71. Tobin, D. D., Menon, M., Menon, M., Spatta, B. C., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (2010). The intrapsychics of gender: A model of self-socialization. Psychological Review, 117, 601–622. doi:10.1037/a0018936.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Toren, N. K. (2013). Multiple dimensions of parental involvement and its links to young adolescent self-evaluation and academic achievement. Psychology in Schools, 50, 634–649. doi:10.1002/pits.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Turner, B. G., Beidel, D. C., Hughes, S., & Turner, M. W. (1993). Test anxiety in African American school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 8, 140–152. doi:10.1016/0887-6185(94)90014-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Upadyaya, K., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts. European Psychologist, 18, 136–147. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vitoroulis, I., Schneider, B., Vasquez, C. C., del Pilar Soteras de Toro, M., & Gonzáles, Y. (2012). Perceived parental and peer support in relation to Canadian, Cuban, and Spanish adolescents’ valuing of academics and intrinsic academic motivation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 704–722. doi:10.1177/0022022111405657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang, M. T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Social support matters: Longitudinal effects of social support on three dimensions of school engagement from middle to high school. Child Development, 83, 877–895. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01745.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using mplus. Chichester: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B., & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 465–480. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.04.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Wharton, A. S. (2009). The sociology of gender: An introduction to theory and research. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  80. Willis, M. L., Dodd, H. F., & Palermo, R. (2013). The relationship between anxiety and the social judgements of approachability and trustworthiness. PLoS One, 8(10), e76825. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0076825.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Woolley, M. E., & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2006). Protective family factors in the context of neighborhood: Promoting positive school outcomes. Family Relations, 55, 93–104. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2006.00359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ya’ari, O. (1998). Test anxiety. Tel Aviv University, Israel: Dionon Press.Google Scholar
  83. Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459–482. doi:10.1002/cne.920180503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Yuan, K.-H., & Bentler, P. M. (2004). On Chi square difference and z-tests in mean and covariance structure analysis when the base model is misspecified. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 737–757. doi:10.1177/0013164404264853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diana Raufelder
    • 1
  • Frances Hoferichter
    • 1
  • Tobias Ringeisen
    • 2
  • Nicola Regner
    • 3
  • Christina Jacke
    • 1
  1. 1.Educational Science and Psychology, Methods and EvaluationFree University BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsMerseburg University of Applied SciencesMerseburgGermany
  3. 3.UCL Institute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations