Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 12, pp 3516–3525 | Cite as

The Influence of Co-offending Within a Moderated Mediation Model of Parent and Peer Predictors of Delinquency

  • Morgan E. Dynes
  • Sarah E. Domoff
  • Sarah Hassan
  • Carolyn J. Tompsett
  • Kelly E. Amrhein
Original Paper


Parental monitoring impacts adolescent delinquency both directly by limiting unsupervised activities and indirectly by limiting access to delinquent peers. Deviant peers may influence adolescent delinquency through a number of mechanisms, and there is a lack of clarity within the literature on distinctions between co-offending and deviant peer norms as influential mechanisms. Less is known about the impact of co-offending on the mediated relationship among parental monitoring, peer delinquency, and adolescent delinquency. The current study examined the relationship between parental monitoring, deviant peer behaviors, co-offending, and self-reported delinquency among 186 court-involved youth (12–18 years old) in a small city in the Midwest. The effects of parental monitoring on delinquency were partially mediated by delinquent peer affiliation. A moderated mediation model found that co-offending moderated the association between delinquent peer affiliation and delinquency, such that the relationship between peer delinquency and self-reported delinquency is stronger for those who co-offend.


Delinquency Peer delinquency Parental monitoring Co-offending Court involved 



This research was supported in part by the Center for Family and Demographic Research, Bowling Green State University, which has core funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD050959-07).


  1. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ary, D. V., Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., & Hops, H. (1999). Adolescent problem behavior: The influence of parents and peers. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 217–230. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00133-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: Commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91(2), 185–198. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.1996.9121852.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bijleveld, C., & Hendriks, J. (2003). Juvenile sex offenders: Differences between group and solo offenders. Psychology, Crime & Law, 9(3), 237–245. doi: 10.1080/1068316021000030568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowman, M. A., Prelow, H. M., & Weaver, S. R. (2007). Parenting behaviors, association with deviant peers, and delinquency in African American adolescents: A mediated-moderation model. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(4), 517–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrington, P. J. (2009). Co-offending and the development of the delinquent career. Criminology, 47, 1295–1329. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2009.00176.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crouter, A. C., & Head, M. R. (2002). Parental monitoring and knowledge of children. In M. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of parenting, 2nd ed., vol. 3: Becoming and being a parent (pp. 461–483). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Dishion, T. J., Andrews, D. W., & Crosby, L. (1995). Adolescent boys and their friends in early adolescence: Relationship characteristics, quality, and interactional processes. Child Development, 66, 139–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00861.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. I. (1991). Family, school and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27, 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27(3), 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influence in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (2003). A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 39, 349–371.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Elliott, D. National Youth Survey [United States]: Wave I, 1976 [Computer File]. ICPSR08375-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university. Bibliographic Citation: Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2008-08-01. doi: 10.3886/ICPSR08375.
  16. Elliott, D. S., & Menard, S. (1996). Delinquent friends and delinquent behavior: Temporal and developmental patterns. In J. David Hawkins (Ed.), Delinquency and crime: Current theories (pp. 28–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goldweber, A., Dmitrieva, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A. R., & Steinberg, L. (2011). The development of criminal style in adolescence and young adulthood: Separating the lemmings from the loners. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 332–346. doi: 10.1007/s10964-010-9534-5.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hardt, R. H., & Peterson-Hardt, S. (1977). On determining the quality of the delinquency self-report method. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 14(2), 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis a regression-based approach. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  20. Henry, D. B., Tolan, P. H., & Gorman-Smith, D. (2001). Longitudinal family and peer group effects on violence and nonviolent delinquency. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30(2), 172–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Keijsers, L., Branje, S., Hawk, S. T., Schwartz, S. J., Frijns, T., Koot, H. M., … & Meeus, W. (2011). Forbidden friends as forbidden fruit: Parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency: Parental supervision of peer relationships. Child Development, no–no. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01701.x
  22. Keijsers, L., Frijns, T., Branje, S. J., & Meeus, W. (2009). Developmental links of adolescent disclosure, parental solicitation, and control with delinquency: Moderation by parental support. Developmental Psychology, 45(5), 1314–1327. doi: 10.1037/a0016693.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 366–380. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.3.366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. J. (2010). A reinterpretation of parental monitoring in longitudinal perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20(1), 39–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lahey, B. B., Van Hulle, C. A., D’Onofrio, B. M., Rodgers, J. L., & Waldman, I. D. (2008). Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 807–823.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Laird, R. D., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2003). Parents’ monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents’ delinquent behavior: Evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Development, 74(3), 752–768.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. McGloin, J. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2010). On the relationship between co-offending network redundancy and offending versatility. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 47, 63–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McGloin, J. M., & Stickle, W. P. (2011). Influence or convenience? Disentangling peer influence and co-offending for chronic offenders. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 48, 419–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McGloin, J. M., Sullivan, C. J., Piquero, A. R., & Bacon, S. (2008). Investigating the stability of co-offending and co-offenders among a sample of youthful offenders. Criminology, 46, 155–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mounts, N. S. (2008). Linkages between parenting and peer relationships: A model for parental management of adolescents peer relationships. In M. Kerr, H. Stattin, & R. Engels (Eds.), What can parents do: New insights into the role of parents in adolescent problem behaviour (pp. 163–189). West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patterson, G. R., DeBaryshe, B. D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. American Psychologist, 44, 329–335. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.44.2.329.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson, G. R., & Dishion, T. J. (1985). Contributions of families and peers to delinquency. Criminology, 23(1), 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Yoerger, K. (2000). Adolescent growth in new forms of problem behavior: Macro-and micro-peer dynamics. Prevention Science, 1(1), 3–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Patterson, G. R., Reid, J. B., & Dishion, T. J. (1992). Antisocial boys. Eugene, OR: Castalia.Google Scholar
  35. Patterson, G. R., & Yoerger, K. (1997). A developmental model for late-onset delinquency. In D. W. Osgood & J. McCord (Eds.), Motivation and delinquency (Vol. 44, pp. 119–177). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  36. Piquero, A. R., Farrington, D. P., & Blumstein, A. (2007). Key issues in criminal career research: New analyses of the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling methods for estimating and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Reiss, A. J. (1986). Co-offender influences on criminal careers. Criminal Careers and Career Criminals, 2, 121–160.Google Scholar
  39. Reiss, A. J., & Farrington, D. P. (1991). Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 82, 360–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simons, R. L., Whitbeck, L. B., & Wu, C. (1994a). Resilient and vulnerable adolescents (pp. 223–234). Families in troubled times: Adapting to change in rural America.Google Scholar
  41. Simons, R. L., Wu, C., Conger, R. D., & Lorenz, F. O. (1994b). Two routes to delinquency: Differences between early and late starters in the impact of parenting and deviant peers. Criminology, 32, 247–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Snyder, J., Schrepferman, L., McEachern, A., Barner, S., Johnson, K., & Provines, J. (2008). Peer deviancy training and peer coercion: Dual processes associated with early-onset conduct problems. Child Development, 79, 252–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Stolzenberg, L., & D’Alessio, S. J. (2008). Co-offending and the age-crime curve. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 45(1), 65–86. doi: 10.1177/0022427807309441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D. P., & Wistrom, P. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 111–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  47. Thornberry, T. P., & Krohn, M. D. (2000). The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice, 4(1), 33–83.Google Scholar
  48. Tilton-Weaver, L. C., Burk, W. J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2013). Can parental monitoring and peer management reduce the selection or influence of delinquent peers? Testing the question using a dynamic social network approach. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2057–2070. doi: 10.1037/a0031854.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tompsett, C. J., & Toro, P. A. (2010). Predicting overt and covert antisocial behaviors: Parents, peers, and homelessness. Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 469–485.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Véronneau, M. H., & Dishion, T. J. (2010). Predicting change in early adolescent problem behavior in the middle school years: A mesosystemic perspective on parenting and peer experiences. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1125–1137.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Warr, M. (1996). Organization and instigation in delinquent groups. Criminology, 34(1), 11–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Warr, M. (2005). Making delinquent friends: Adult supervision and children’s affiliations. Criminology, 43, 77–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weerman, F. M. (2003). Co-offending as social exchange: Explaining characteristics of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 398–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weerman, F. M. (2004). The changing role of delinquent peers in childhood and adolescence: Issues, findings and puzzles. In G. Bruinsma, H. Elffers, & J. W. de Keijser (Eds.), Punishment, places and perpetrators: Developments in criminology and criminal justice research (pp. 279–297). Portland, OR: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  56. Zimring, F. E., & Laqueur, H. (2014). Kids, groups, and crime in defense of conventional wisdom. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. doi: 10.1177/0022427814555770.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morgan E. Dynes
    • 1
  • Sarah E. Domoff
    • 2
  • Sarah Hassan
    • 1
  • Carolyn J. Tompsett
    • 1
  • Kelly E. Amrhein
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBowling Green State UniversityBowling GreenUSA
  2. 2.Center for Human Growth and DevelopmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations