Advertisement

Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 7, pp 1932–1942 | Cite as

Autonomous and Controlled Motivation for Parenting: Associations with Parent and Child Outcomes

  • Tomas JungertEmail author
  • Renée Landry
  • Mireille Joussemet
  • Geneviève Mageau
  • Isabelle Gingras
  • Richard Koestner
Original Paper

Abstract

The present investigation examined motivation for parenting and some of its correlates in parents and children. The data came from samples of 151 first-time mothers of infants, 153 mothers of middle school children, and 260 mothers and fathers of high school children. Parents provided self-report data about their motivation in their parenting role as well as reports of role satisfaction, parental competence, child temperament, and parenting styles. Using three samples, factor analyses confirmed the distinction between autonomous and controlled forms of parenting motivation. Autonomous motivation refers to investing in the parenting role because it is interesting and meaningful whereas controlled motivation refers to investment based on external or internal pressures. Results showed that autonomous motivation was associated concurrently with parenting satisfaction and competence as well as with authoritative and autonomy-supportive parenting styles. Child temperament was unrelated to parenting motivation, but mothers reported greater autonomous motivation for girls than boys and for younger children rather than older children. Autonomous parenting motivation was associated with children reporting autonomy supportive parenting and high levels of well-being. A prospective analysis showed that controlled parenting motivation in first time mothers was associated with reductions in parenting satisfaction as infants became toddlers. A similar analysis showed that autonomous parenting motivation was associated with children developing fewer behavior problems whereas controlled motivation was associated with children developing more behavioral problems. The present findings highlight the heuristic value of assessing why parents invest themselves in the parenting role.

Keywords

Motivation for parenting Role satisfaction Parental competence Child temperament Parenting style 

References

  1. Achenbach, T. M. (2000). Child behavior checklist. In A. E. Kazdin (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 69–70). Washington, DC: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2000). Manual for the ASEBA preschool forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.Google Scholar
  3. Anderman, E. M. (2002). School effects on psychological outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 795–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, J. E., Freeland, C. A., & Lounsbury, M. L. (1979). Measurement of infant difficultness. Child Development, 50, 794–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumrind, D. (1971). Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology, 4, 1–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19, 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macro theory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The life with satisfaction scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Emmons, R. A. (1992). Abstract versus concrete goals: Personal striving level, physical illness, and psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 292–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Froiland, J. M. (2011). Parental autonomy support and student learning goals: A preliminary examination of an intrinsic motivation intervention. Child & Youth Care Forum, 40, 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Froiland, J. M. (2013). Parents’ weekly descriptions of autonomy supportive communication: Promoting children’s motivation to learn and positive emotions. Journal of Child and Family Studies. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9819-x.
  13. Gingras, I. (2007). S’impliquer dans l’éducation des enfants, mais pas trop non plus: la balance clé pour le bien-être des enfants. Final research report presented to the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture (FQRSC).Google Scholar
  14. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grolnick, W. S., Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1991). Inner resources for school achievement: Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Lekes, N., & Houlfort, N. (2004). Introducing uninteresting tasks to children: A comparison of the effects of rewards and autonomy support. Journal of Personality, 72, 141–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., Lekes, N., & Landry, R. (2005). A longitudinal study of the relations maternal support to children’s adjustment and achievement in school. Journal of Personality, 73, 1215–1235.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Joussemet, M., Landry, R., & Koestner, R. (2008). A self-determination theory perspective on parenting. Canadian Psychology, 49, 194–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Landry, R., Whipple, N., Mageau, G., Joussemet, M., Koestner, R., DiDio, L., et al. (2008). Trust in organismic development, autonomy support, and adaptation among mothers and their children. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. MacPhee, D., Benson, J. B., & Bullock, D. (1986). Influences on maternal self-perceptions. In Paper presented at the Fifth Biennial International Conference on Infant Studies.Google Scholar
  21. Milyavskaya, M., Gingras, I., Mageau, G., Koestner, R., Gagnon, H., Fang, J., et al. (2009). Balance across contexts: The importance of balanced need satisfaction across life domains in adolescence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 1031–1045.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pelletier, L. G., Séguin-Lévesque, C., & Legault, L. (2002). Pressure from above and pressure from below as determinants of teachers’ motivation and teaching behaviors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 186–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pomerantz, E. M., Grolnick, W. S., & Price, C. E. (2005). The role of parents in how children approach achievement: A dynamic process perspective. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 229–278). New York: Guilford Press Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Robbins, R. J. (1995). An assessment of perceived parental autonomy-support and control: Child and parent correlates (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession Order No. AAM9523161).Google Scholar
  25. Robinson, C. C., Mandleco, B., Olsen, S. F., & Hart, C. H. (2001). The parenting styles and dimensions questionnaire. In J. Touliatos & B. Perlmutter (Eds.), Handbook of family measurement techniques (2nd ed., pp. 319–321). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  26. Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63, 397–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ryan, R. M., & Connel, J. P. (1989). Perceive d locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Lens, W., Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., et al. (2007). Conceptualizing parental autonomy support: Adolescent perceptions of promotion of independence versus promotion of volitional functioning. Developmental Psychology, 43, 633–646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stayton, D. J., Hogan, R., & Ainsworth, M. D. (1971). Infant obedience and maternal behavior: The origins of socialization reconsidered. Child Development, 42, 1057–1069.Google Scholar
  32. Su, Y. L., & Reeve, J. (2011). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of intervention programs designed to support autonomy. Educational Psychology Review, 23, 159–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomas Jungert
    • 1
    Email author
  • Renée Landry
    • 2
  • Mireille Joussemet
    • 3
  • Geneviève Mageau
    • 3
  • Isabelle Gingras
    • 2
  • Richard Koestner
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioural Sciences and LearningLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.McGill UniversityMontréalCanada
  3. 3.Université de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations