Skip to main content
Log in

The Intergenerational Transmission of Interpersonal Problems: An Exploration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents results on the intergenerational transmission of interpersonal problems. Ninety-eight German mothers, fathers, and their young adult offspring completed the German version of the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-D64), which is conceptually based on the assumption of a circumplex structure of eight interpersonal problems. Model learning and psychodynamic theories were used to formulate assumptions about possible intergenerational similarity and dissimilarity, as well as about effects of family and societal context. The results showed the highest intergenerational correlations for three of the eight interpersonal problems in the IIP-D64, namely nonassertiveness, overly strong accommodation, and self-sacrificing tendencies. Intergenerational similarity was found only for mother–offspring dyads for two other problems: domineering and vindictiveness tendencies. No significant intergenerational similarity was found for coldness, social inhibition, or intrusiveness. In-depth analyses revealed higher similarities in families in which at least one parent had an overall IIP-64 score equal to or more than one standard deviation from the norm sample mean (as opposed to families where both parents had overall IIP-64 scores closer to the normative German mean). The findings are tentatively interpreted as suggesting that intergenerational transmission occurs only for problems on one axis of the interpersonal circumplex, i.e., the agency axis, but not for problems on the communality axis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2011). Differential susceptibility to rearing environment depending on dopamine-related genes: New evidence and a meta-analysis. Development and Psychopathology, 23, 39–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological modelling. New York: Lieber-Antherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, K. M., & Belsky, J. (2012). Gene-environment interaction and the intergenerational transmission of parenting: Testing the differential-susceptibility hypothesis. Psychiatric Quarterly, 83(1), 29–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Besharat, M. A., & Habibi, M. (2004). A comparative study of interpersonal problems among twins and singletons. Twin Research and Human Genetics, 7(4), 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehnke, K. (2004). Do our children become as we are? Intergenerational value transmission and societal value change-two unlinked concepts in social research. In F. Hardt (Ed.), Mapping the world: New perspectives in the humanities and social sciences (pp. 99–118). Tübingen: Francke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehnke, K., Hadjar, A., & Baier, D. (2007). Parent-child value similarity: The role of zeitgeist. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 778–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehnke, K., Ittel, A., & Baier, D. (2002). Value transmission and ‘zeitgeist’: An underresearched relationship. Sociale Wetenschappen, 45, 28–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolgar, R., Zweig-Frank, H., & Paris, J. (1995). Childhood antecedents of interpersonal problems in young adult children of divorce. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34(2), 143–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brähler, E., Horowitz, L. M., Kordy, H., Schumacher, J., & Strauß, B. (1999). Zur Validierung des Inventars zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme (IIP)—Ergebnisse einer Repräsentativbefragung in Ost- und Westdeutschland [Validation of the inventory of interpersonal problems (IIP)—Results of a representative study in East and West Germany]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, Medizinische Psychologie, 49(11), 422–431.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research on teaching. In N. L. Gage (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 171–246). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159.

  • Coolidge, F. L., Thede, L. L., & Jang, K. L. (2001). Heritability of childhood personality disorders: A preliminary study. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 33–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1, 1–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadjar, A., Boehnke, K., Knafo, A., Daniel, E., Musiol, A.-L., Schiefer, D., & Möllering, A. (2012). Parent-child value similarity and subjective well-being in the context of migration: An exploration. Family Science, 3, 55–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heer, D. M. (1963). The measurement and bases of family power: An overview. Marriage and Family Living, 25, 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, A. L. (2000a). Inventory of Interpersonal Problems manual. Odessa, FL: The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., Rosenberg, S. E., Baer, B. A., Ureno, G., & Villasenor, V. S. (1988). Inventory of interpersonal problems: Psychometric properties and clinical applications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 885–892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., Strauß, B., & Kordy, H. (2000b). Inventar zur Erfassung Interpersonaler Probleme—Deutsche Version [Inventory for the assessment of interpersonal problems—German version]. Manual. Göttingen: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, L. M., & Vitkus, J. (1986). The interpersonal basis of psychiatric symptomatology. Clinical Psychology Review, 6, 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. G. (1933). Die Beziehungen zwischen dem Ich und dem Unbewußten [The relationsship between the ego and the unconscious]. Zürich: Rascher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1983). The 1982 interpersonal circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90, 185–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knafo, A., & Spinath, F. M. (2011). Genetic and environmental influences on girls’ and boys’ gender-typed and gender-neutral values. Developmental Psychology, 47, 726–731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality. New York: Ronald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, K. D. (2005). Interpersonal problems and interpersonal expectations in everyday life. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 24, 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rammstedt, B., & Farmer, R. F. (2013). The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure. Psychological Assessment, 25(4), 1137–1145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rammstedt, B., Goldberg, L. R., & Borg, I. (2010). The measurement equivalence of Big Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education. Journal of Research in Personality, 44, 53–61.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, L. C., Bianchi, S. M., & Robinson, J. P. (2004). Are parents investing less in children? Trends in mothers’ and fathers’ time with children. American Journal of Sociology, 110(1), 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlippe, A. V., & Schweitzer, J. (1996). Lehrbuch der systemischen Therapie und Beratung [Textbook of systemic therapy and counseling]. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, H. S., Perry, H. S., & Gawel, M. L. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: Norton.

  • Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education,. doi:10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfdISSN:2042-6372.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, P., Berry, J., Sabatier, C., & Sam, D. (2009). The intergenerational transmission of values in national and immigrant families: The role of Zeitgeist. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38(5), 642–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J. (1980). Parents and peers in social development: A Sullivan–Piaget perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, Monograph supplement No. 2, Part 2.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Grant I-241-065 from the German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development (GIF), awarded to the author and to Shalom H. Schwartz, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus Boehnke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Boehnke, K. The Intergenerational Transmission of Interpersonal Problems: An Exploration. J Child Fam Stud 24, 2999–3008 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0103-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-014-0103-5

Keywords

Navigation