Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 809–820 | Cite as

Parents’ Perceptions of Risk and the Influence on Children’s Everyday Activities

  • Anita Nelson NiehuesEmail author
  • Anita Bundy
  • Alexander Broom
  • Paul Tranter
Original Paper


This paper reports the results of a qualitative study of parents’ perceptions of risk and the influence these perceptions had on children’s access to age-appropriate risk taking activities. Thirty-seven parents, aged 28–55 years, participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews after completing a card sort of the attributes they most desired for their children. Parents formed two groups; one (n = 18) comprised parents who had encountered significant risk in their lives; the second (n = 19) had lived relatively risk-free lives. All parents focused on one of their children, aged 5–17 years, as they engaged in the interviews. We based our analysis of participants’ narratives on an adaptation of Charmaz’s approach to social analysis and Packer’s perspective of hermeneutic interpretation. While all parents provided their children with autonomy support (i.e., structure, guidance and connectedness), parents who had experienced significant risks themselves were better able to balance safety and adventure and offer their children opportunities to manage everyday risk and uncertainty. These parents focused on the benefits of participating in age-appropriate risk taking activities to develop life skills. Parents who had relatively risk-free lives focused more on protecting children from harm and preventing them from making mistakes. These parents’ narratives reflected their concerns about whether they were doing the right things for their children and whether others viewed them as good parents. Results suggested that when parents balanced telic (i.e., serious, cautious, goal-oriented, arousal-reducing) and paratelic (i.e., playful, adventurous, activity-oriented, arousal-seeking) motivations and offered children opportunities to engage in age-appropriate risk taking, their children also learned to move between telic and paratelic motivations flexibly. We conclude that risk and uncertainty are not only valuable, but necessary, contributors to children’s healthy development of happiness, well-being and resilience.


Risk perception Risk taking Parents Children’s well-being Resilience 


  1. Alaszewski, A., & Coxon, K. (2009). Uncertainty in everyday life: Risk, worry and trust. Health, Risk & Society, 11(3), 201–207. doi: 10.1080/13698570902906454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apter, M. J. (2007). Reversal theory:The dynamics of motivation, emotion, and personality (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Broom, A. (2009). Intuition, subjectivity, and Le Bricoleur: Cancer patients’ accounts of negotiating a plurality of therapeutic options. Qualitative Health Research, 19(8), 1050–1059. doi: 10.1177/1049732309341190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown, S. (2009). Play: How it shapes the brain, opens the imagination, and invigorates the soul. New York: Avery.Google Scholar
  7. Brussoni, M., Olsen, L. L., Pike, I., & Sleet, D. A. (2012). Risky play and children’s safety: Balancing priorities for optimal child development. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(9), 3134–3148. doi: 10.3390/ijerph9093134.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Buchanan, C. (1999). Building better playgrounds: A project for parents. UAB Magazine, 19(3).Google Scholar
  9. Bundy, A., Naughton, G., Tranter, P., Wyver, S., Baur, L., Schiller, W., Brentnall, J. (2011). The Sydney playground project: Popping the bubblewrap-unleashing the power of play: A cluster randomized controlled trial of a primary school playground-based intervention aiming to increase children’s physical activity and social skills. BMC Public Health, 11. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-680.
  10. Charmaz, K. (1990). ‘Discovering’ chronic illness: Using grounded theory. Social Science & Medicine, 30(11), 1161–1172. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90256-R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A. M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361–368. doi: 10.1037/a0015952.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. doi: 10.1037/a00128001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100(2), 185–207. doi: 10.1007/s11205-010-9632-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542–575.Google Scholar
  15. Diener, M., & Lucas, R. (2004). Adults desires for childrens emotions across 48 countries: Associations with Individual and National Characteristics. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35(5), 525–547. doi: 10.1177/0022022104268387.Google Scholar
  16. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and blame: Essays in cultural theory. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dweck, C. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  18. Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2000). Positive affect and the other side of coping. American Psychologist, 55(6), 647–654.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.56.3.218.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity. New York: Crown Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  21. Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. (2005). Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678–686. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.60.7.678.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Fredrickson, B. L., Mancuso, R. A., Branigan, C., & Tugade, M. M. (2000). The undoing effect of positive emotions. Motivation and Emotion, 24(4), 237–258.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Gill, T. (2007). No fear: Growing up in a risk averse society. London: Calouse Gulbenkian Foundation.Google Scholar
  25. Gray, C. (2010). The new social story book: Future Horizons Incorporated.Google Scholar
  26. Grolnick, W. (2009). The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 164–173. doi: 10.1177/1477878509104321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grolnick, W., & Seal, K. (2008). Pressured parents, stressed-out kids: Dealing with competition while raising a successful child: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  28. Guldberg, H. (2009). Reclaiming childhood: Freedom and play in an age of fear. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Hoffman, D. M. (2012). Risky investments: Parenting and the production of the “resilient child”. Health, Risk & Society, 12(4), 385–394. doi: 10.1080/13698571003789716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(6), 735–762. doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking: fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  32. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lupton, D. (1999). Risk. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Lyubomirsky, S. (2009). The how of happiness: Is it possible to become lastingly happier and if so, how? Paper presented at the happiness and its causes conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
  35. Lyubomirsky, S., Sheldon, K., & Schkade, D. (2005). Pursuing happiness: The architecture of sustainable change. Review of General Psychology, 9(2), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Masten, A. S. (2001). Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist, 56(3), 227–238. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921–930. doi: 10.1017/s0954579407000442.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Moores, A., Akhurst, J., & Powell, J. (2010). Using a card sort to structure and promote enquiry-based learning. The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 73(5), 229–236. doi: 10.4276/030802210x12734991664264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Niehues, A., Bundy, A., Broom, A., & Tranter, P. (2013). Everyday uncertainties: Reframing adults’ perceptions of risk in children’s outdoor free play. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 1. doi: 10.1080/14729679.2013.798588.
  40. Packer, M. (2011). The science of qualitative research. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Park, N. (2004). Character strengths and positive youth development. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 40–54. doi: 10.1177/0002716203260079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. doi: 10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Power, A. (2011, June 21, 2013). Thoughts on surplus safety. Retrieved from Scholar
  44. Rugg, G., & McGeorge, P. (2005). The sorting techniques: A tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Systems, 22(3), 94–107. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0394.2005.00300.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Sandseter, E. B. H. (2007). Categorizing risky play: ‘How can we identify risk taking in children’s play?’. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 15(2), 237–252. doi: 10.1080/13502930701321733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sandseter, E. B. H. (2010). ‘It tickles in my tummy!’:Understanding children’s risk taking in play through reversal theory. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 8(1), 67–88. doi: 10.1177/1476718x09345393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sandseter, E. B. H., & Kennair, L. E. O. (2011). Children’s risky play from an evolutionary perspective: The Anti-phobic effects of thrilling experiences. Evolutionary Psychology, 9(2), 257–284.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Seligman, M. (2008). Positive health. Applied Psychology: An International Reivew, 57, 3–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00351.x.
  50. Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  51. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  52. Tovey, H. (2007). Playing outdoors: Spaces and places, risk and challenge. New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Ungar, M. (2007). Too safe for their own good: How risk and responsibility help teens thrive. Crow’s Nest, NSW: Inspired Living.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anita Nelson Niehues
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anita Bundy
    • 1
  • Alexander Broom
    • 2
  • Paul Tranter
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of SydneyLidcombeAustralia
  2. 2.University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
  3. 3.University of New South Wales, Australian Defence Force AcademyCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations