Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Impact of Peer Partner Support on Self Efficacy for Justice-Involved Parents: A Controlled Study of Juvenile Justice 101

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systems of care and other health-related initiatives have encouraged the proliferation of parent support policies in mental health, child welfare and education systems. However, the juvenile court system has relatively few programs that provide direct peer support for parents and little is known about the impact of parent support on families navigating the court process. Juvenile Justice 101 is one of only a few such programs. The present study examined the effect of the peer support element of Juvenile Justice 101 compared to video-only and no intervention conditions in a pre/post-test design. One hundred and ten parents agreed to participate in the study, 54 on a day with the peer support condition, 28 on a video-only day and 28 on a no-intervention day. Sixteen parents in the peer support condition were able to participate in the full program and seven parents in the video-only condition participated in the full video. Analyses disaggregate the effects of condition assignment and participation. Self-efficacy in navigating the juvenile court process improved for parents who participated in peer support but no improvement was observed for the other conditions. Parents in the peer support condition also rated peer partners higher than court staff on a dimension assessing process of care. The implications for practice and policy for peer support and family-driven services in juvenile court are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrera, M., Jr. (1986). Distinctions between social support concepts, measures, and models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 14, 413–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrows, S. J. (1904). Children’s courts in the United States: Their origin, development, and results. Reports prepared for the International Penal and Prison Commission. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brister, T., Cavaleri, M., Olin, S., Shen, S., Burns, B., & Hoagwood, K. (2012). An evaluation of the NAMI basics program. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 21(3), 439–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, B. J., Hoagwood, K., & Mrazek, P. J. (1999). Effective treatment for mental disorders in children and adolescents. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 2(4), 199–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S.-T., Lam, L. C. W., Kwok, T., Ng, N. S. S., & Fung, A. W. T. (2013). Self-efficacy is associated with less burden and more gains from behavioral problems of Alzheimer’s disease in Hong Kong Chinese caregivers. Gerontologist, 53(1), 71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A. K., & Gordon, J. A. (2012). Get him out of my house: Parental competencies of juvenile probationers. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10, 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. S., Gavazzi, S. M., Scheer, S. D., & Uppal, R. (2011). Measuring individualized parent advocate services in children’s mental health: A contextualized theoretical application. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(5), 669–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. S., Scheer, S. D., Gavazzi, S. M., & Uppal, R. (2010). Parent advocates in children’s mental health: Program implementation processes and considerations. Administration and Policy In Mental Health, 37(6), 468–483.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. M., Scott, E. S., Wadlington, W., & Whitebreak, C. H. (1997). Children and the legal system (2nd ed.). Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, C. K. (2013). Dealing with missing data in developmental research. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 27–31. doi:10.1111/cdep.12008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E., Armstrong, M. I., Dollard, N., Kuppinger, A. D., Huz, S., & Wood, V. M. (1994). Development and evaluation of treatment foster care and family-centered intensive case management in New York. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 2(4), 228–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. E., Armstrong, M. I., & Kuppinger, A. D. (1996). Family-centered intensive case management: A step toward understanding individualized care. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. C. (1993a). Criminalizing the American juvenile court. In M. Tony (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 17, pp. 197–280). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. C. (1993b). Juvenile (in)justice and the criminal court alternative. Crime and Delinquency, 39(4), 403–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feld, B. C., & Schaefer, S. (2010). The right to counsel in juvenile court: The conundrum of attorneys as an aggravating factor at disposition. Justice Quarterly, 27(5), 713–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, B. J., & Stephens, B. (1998). Expanding family roles in the system of care: Research and practice. In M. H. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. J. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families (pp. 231–259). Austin: PRO:ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. W. (2009). Missing data analysis: Making it work in the real world. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 549–576.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graves, K. N., & Shelton, T. E. (2007). Family empowerment as a mediator between family-centered systems of care and changes in child functioning: Identifying an important mechanism of change. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 16, 556–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvell, S., Rodas, B., & Hendey, L. (2004). Parental involvement in juvenile justice: Prospects and possibilities (pp. 1–15): The Center for Research on Children in the U.S. (CROCUS) Georgetown Public Policy Institute. The Georgetown University Department of Psychology.

  • Hogan, B. E., Linden, W., & Najarian, B. (2002). Social support interventions: Do they work? Clinical Psychology Review, 22, 381–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Justice for Families & Data Center. (2012). Families unlocking futures: Solutions to the crisis in juvenile justice.

  • King, G., King, S., Rosenbaum, P., & Goffin, R. (1999). Family-centered caregiving and well-being of parents of children with disabilities: Linking process with outcome. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 24(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S., Rosenbaum, P., & King, G. (1998). Measure of processes of care (MPOC-20): CanChild centre for childhood disability research. Ontario, Canada: McMaster University.

  • Koroloff, N. M., & Elliott, D. J. (1996). Linking low-income families to children’s mental health services: An outcome study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4(1), 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutash, K., Duchnowski, A., Green, A., & Ferron, J. (2010). Supporting parents who have youth with emotional disturbances through a parent-to-parent support program: A proof of concept study using random assingment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38(5), 412–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Models for Change. (2009). Family involvement in Pennsylvania’s juvenile justice system. Family involvement subcommittee of the mental health/juvenile justice workgroup for models for change-Pennsylvania and family involvement workgroup of the Pennsylvania council of chief juvenile probation officer’s balanced & restorative justice implementation committee.

  • Munson, M. R., Hussey, D., Stormann, C., & King, T. (2009). Voices of parent advocates within the systems of care model of service delivery. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(8), 879–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mystakidou, K., Parpa, E., Panagiotou, I., Tsilika, E., Galanos, A., & Gouliamos, A. (2013). Caregivers’ anxiety and self-efficacy in palliative care. European Journal of Cancer Care, 22(2), 188–195.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pennell, J., Shapiro, C., & Spigner, C. (2011). Safety, fairness, stability: Repositioning juvenile justice and child welfare to engage families and communities. Washington, DC: Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, Georgetown University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. D., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Empowerment theory, research, and application. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 569–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, A. M. (2009). The child savers: The invention of delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 40th anniversary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan, T. E. (2004). What do we do with missing data? Some options for analysis of incomplete data. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, 99–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romanelli, L. H., Landsverk, J., Levitt, J. M., Leslie, L. K., Hurley, M. M., Bellonci, C., et al. (2009). Best practices for mental health in child welfare: Screening, assessment, and treatment guidelines. Child Welfare, 88(1), 163–188.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. C., Glaser, B. A., Calhoun, G. B., & Bates, J. M. (2004). Assessing the parents of juvenile offenders: A preliminary validation study of the juvenile offender parent questionnaire. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 26(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samadi, S. A., McConkey, R., & Kelly, G. (2013). Enhancing parental well-being and coping through a family-centred short course for Iranian parents of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Autism: The International Journal of Research & Practice, 17(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semke, C. A., Garbacz, S. A., Kwon, K., Sheridan, S. M., & Woods, K. E. (2010). Family involvement for children with disruptive behaviors: The role of parenting stress and motivational beliefs. Journal of School Psychology, 48(4), 293–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slaton, A. E. (2012). What a difference family-driven makes: Stories of success and lessons learned. American Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3–4), 538–545.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soulier, M. F., & Scott, C. L. (2010). Juveniles in court. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 18(6), 317–325.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1986). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbances (revised edition). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Child Development Center, CASSP Technical Assistance Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, R. F. (1977). Expanding the neglected role of the parent in the juvenile court. Pepperdine Law Review, 4(3), 523–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. C., Pullmann, M. D., & Trupin, E. W. (2012). Juvenile Justice 101: Addressing family support needs in juvenile court. Journal of Juvenile Justice, 2(1), 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, R., Inui, T., Barriatua, R., Carter, W., & Lippincott, P. (1983). Responsiveness to maternal concern in preventive child health visits: An analysis of clinician-parent interactions. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 4(3), 171–176.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, G., Young, K., McReynolds, L., Keating, J., Fisher, P., Huo, Y., & Turner, J. (1999). Conduct and oppositional defiant disorder: Patterns of systems in youths classified as delinquents and persons in need of supervision. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisdom, J., Olin, S., Shorter, P., Burton, G., & Hoagwood, K. (2011). Family peer advocates: A pilot study of the content and process of service provision. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(6), 833–843.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, J., Hernandez, M., Friedman, B., & Uzzell, D. (2001). Systems of care: Promising practices in children’s mental health (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: Center for Effective Collaboration and Practice, American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Public Behavioral Health and Justice Policy, University of Washington, 2815 Eastlake Avenue East, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA

    Sarah Cusworth Walker, Asia Sarah Bishop & Anne C. Guthrie

  2. Washington DADS, Mill Creek, WA, USA

    Karen Trayler & Ron Jaeger

  3. King County Superior Court—Juvenile Court Services, Seattle, WA, USA

    Steve Gustaveson

Authors
  1. Sarah Cusworth Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asia Sarah Bishop
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karen Trayler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ron Jaeger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Steve Gustaveson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anne C. Guthrie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Cusworth Walker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, S.C., Bishop, A.S., Trayler, K. et al. Impact of Peer Partner Support on Self Efficacy for Justice-Involved Parents: A Controlled Study of Juvenile Justice 101. J Child Fam Stud 24, 443–454 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9856-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-013-9856-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation