Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 460–470 | Cite as

Identifying Mediators of the Influence of Family Factors on Risky Sexual Behavior

  • Leslie Gordon Simons
  • Callie Harbin Burt
  • Rachel Blyskal Tambling
Original Paper


Participation in risky sexual behaviors has many deleterious consequences and is a source of concern for parents as well as practitioners, researchers, and public policy makers. Past research has examined the effect of family structure and supportive parenting on risky sexual behaviors among emerging adults. In the present study, we attempt to identify the mediators that explain this relationship. Using survey data from a sample of over 2,000 college students (1,297 females and 780 males) we use structural equation modeling to investigate the role of commitment to marriage, desired characteristics in an intimate partner, and sociosexuality in linking the influence of family structure and supportive parenting to risky sexual behaviors. Results indicate that respondents from continuously married families were more committed to marriage, and this commitment reduced the probability of risky sexual behavior both directly, as well as indirectly through its negative impact on unrestricted sociosexuality. On the other hand, respondents who reported having supportive parents rated sensitivity and similarity of values as more important in a mate than physical attractiveness and sexual compatibility. This approach to mate selection reduces unrestricted sociosexuality and, in turn, risky sexual behavior. Even after taking our mediators into account, there is still a direct effect of family factors on risky sexual behavior. Gender differences in the pattern of findings are discussed and directions for future research are identified.


Risky sexual behavior Family of origin Desired partner characteristics Commitment to marriage Sociosexuality 


  1. Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage? Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1038–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amato, P. R., & Rogers, S. J. (1999). Do attitudes toward divorce affect marital quality? Journal of Family Issues, 20, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apel, R., & Kaukinen, C. (2008). On the relationship between family structure and antisocial behavior: Parental cohabitation and blended households. Criminology, 46, 35–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbuckle, J. L. (2003). AMOS 5 for windows. Chicago: Smallwaters.Google Scholar
  5. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 5, 469–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arnett, J. J. (2007). Socialization in emerging adulthood. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 208–255). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Aseltine, R. H. (2003). The impact of parental divorce on premarital pregnancy. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 122–129.Google Scholar
  8. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berlin, L. J., Cassidy, J., & Appleyard, K. (2006). The influence of early attachments on other relationships. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 333–347). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bogaert, A. F., & Sadava, S. (2002). Adult attachment and sexual behavior. Personal Relationships, 9, 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bond, L., Lavelle, K., & Lauby, J. (2002). A comparison of the risk characteristics of ever-pregnant and never- pregnant sexually active adolescents. Journal of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Education for Adolescents and Children, 5, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Breivik, K., Olweus, D., & Endresen, I. (2009). Does the quality of parent-child relationships mediate the increased risk for antisocial behavior and substance use among adolescents in single-mother and single-father families? Journal of Marriage and Divorce, 50, 400–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Browne, M. W., & Cudek, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21, 230–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Buss, D. M., Shackelford, T. K., Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Larsen, R. J. (2001). A half-century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clawson, C. L., & Reese-Weber, M. (2003). The amount and timing of parent-adolescent sexual communication as predictors of late adolescent sexual risk-taking behaviors. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 256–265.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conger, R. D., & Elder, G. H. (1994). Families in troubled times. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Conger, R. D., Ming, G., & Bryant, C. M. (2001). Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences. Prevention and Treatment, 4, 1–25.Google Scholar
  19. Demo, D. H., & Acock, A. C. (1996). Family structure, family process, and adolescent well-being. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6, 457–488.Google Scholar
  20. Dishion, T. J., & McMahon, R. J. (1998). Parental monitoring and the prevention of child and adolescent problem behavior: A conceptual and empirical formulation. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 1, 61–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Ageton, S. S. (1985). Explaining delinquency and drug use. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., & Menard, S. (1989). Multiple problem youth: Delinquency, substance use, and mental health problems. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Feeney, J. A. (2008). Adult romantic attachment: Developments in the study of couple relationships. In J. Cassidy & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 456–481). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  24. Gangstad, S. W., & Thornhill, R. (1997). The evolutionary psychology of extra pair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution and Human Behavior, 18, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gentzler, A. L., & Kerns, K. A. (2004). Associations between insecure attachment and sexual experiences. Personal Relationships, 11, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grello, C. M., Welsh, D. P., Harper, M. S., & Dickson, J. W. (2003). Dating and sexual relationship trajectories and adolescent functioning. Adolescent and Family Health, 3, 103–112. Google Scholar
  27. Huebner, A., & Howell, L. (2003). Examining the relationship between adolescent sexual risk-taking and perceptions of monitoring, communication, and parenting styles. Journal of Adolescent Health, 33, 71–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jeynes, W. (2001). The effects of recent parental divorce on their children’s sexual attitudes and behavior. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 35, 115–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kan, M. L., Cheng, Y. A., Landale, N. S., & McHale, S. M. (2010). Longitudinal predictors of change in number of sexual partners across adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Adolescent Health, 46, 25–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kapungu, C., Holmbeck, G. N., & Paikoff, R. L. (2006). Longitudinal association between parenting practices and early sexual risk behaviors among urban African American adolescents: The moderating role of gender. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35, 787–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kiernan, K. E., & Hobcraft, J. (1997). Parental divorce during childhood: Age at first intercourse, partnership and parenthood. Population Studies, 51, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Krantz, S. R., Lynch, D. A., & Russell, J. M. (2002). Gender-specific profiles of self-reported adolescent HIV risk behaviors. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care, 13, 25–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Landor, A., Simons, L. G., Simons, R. L., Brody, G. H., & Gibbons, F. X. (2011). The influence of religion on African American adolescents’ risky sexual behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40, 296–309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lohman, B. J., & Billings, A. (2007). Protective and risk factors associated with adolescent boys’ early sexual debut and risky sexual behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 723–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Main, M., Kaplan, N., & Cassidy, J. (1985). Security in infancy, childhood and adulthood: A move to the level of representation. In I. Bretherton, & E. Waters (Eds.), Growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. 50, pp. 66–104.Google Scholar
  36. Martin, P. D., Martin, D., & Martin, M. (2001). Adolescent premarital sexual activity, cohabitation, and attitudes toward marriage. Adolescence, 36, 601–609.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, P. D., Specter, G., Martin, D., & Martin, M. (2003). Expressed attitudes of adolescents toward marriage and family life. Adolescence, 38, 359–367.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Meschke, L. L., Bartholomac, S., & Zentall, S. R. (2000). Adolescent sexuality and parent-adolescent processes: Promoting healthy teen choices. Family Relations, 49, 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Metzler, C. W., Noell, J., & Biglan, A. (1992). The validation of a construct of high-risk sexual behavior in heterosexual adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 233–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, B. C. (2002). Family influences on adolescent sexual and contraceptive behavior. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 22–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Miller, B. C., Benson, B., & Galbraith, K. A. (2001). Family relationships and adolescent pregnancy risk: A research synthesis. Developmental Review, 21, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, K. S., Forehand, R., & Kotchick, B. A. (1999). Adolescent sexual behavior in two ethnic minority samples: The role of family variables. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Musick, K., & Bumpass, L. (1999). How do prior experiences in the family affect transitions to adulthood? In L. Wu & B. Wolfe (Eds.), Out of wedlock: Causes and consequences of nonmarital fertility (pp. 3–48). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  44. O’Connor, M. L. (2001). Men who have many sexual partners before marriage are more likely to engage in extramarital sex. International Family Planning Perspectives, 27, 48–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oliver, M. B., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Effects of sexual permissiveness on desirability of partner as a function of low and high commitment to relationship. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 321–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Previti, D., & Amato, P. R. (2004). Is infidelity a cause or a consequence of poor marital quality? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Regan, P. C., & Joshi, A. (2003). Ideal partner preferences among adolescents. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 31, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, F. S., & Gate, R. (2000). Partner preferences: What characteristics do men and women desire in their short-term sexual and long-term romantic partners? Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 12, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Regenerus, M., & Uecker, J. (2011). Premarital sex in America. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Reis, I. L. (1967). The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  51. Resnick, M. D., Bearman, P. S., Blum, R. W., Bauman, K. E., Harris, K. M., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278, 823–832.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riggio, H. R., & Weiser, D. A. (2008). Attitudes toward marriage: Embeddedness and outcomes in personal relationships. Personal Relationships, 15, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Risch, S. C., Jodl, K. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Role of the father-adolescent relationship in shaping adolescents’ attitudes toward divorce. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rodgers, K. B. (1999). Parenting processes related to sexual risk-taking behaviors of adolescent males and females. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 6, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rostosky, S. S., Regnerus, M. D., & Wright, M. L. C. (2003). Coital debut: The role of religiosity and sex attitudes in the add health survey. Journal of Sex Research, 40, 358–367.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sarkar, M. B. (2001). Adolescents’ and young adults’ sexual behavior, STD and AIDS. International Medical Journal, 8, 167–173.Google Scholar
  57. Simons, R. L., Simons, L. G., & Wallace, L. E. (2004). Families, delinquency, and crime: Linking society’s most basic institution to antisocial behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1992). Sociosexuality and romantic partner choice. Journal of Personality, 60, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tracy, J. L., Shaver, P. R., Albino, A. W., & Cooper, M. L. (2003). Attachment styles and adolescent sexuality. In P. Florsheim (Ed.), Adolescent romantic relations and sexual behavior: Theory, research, and practical implications (pp. 137–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  60. Thornton, A., & Camburn, D. (1987). The influence of the family on premarital sexual attitudes and behavior. Demography, 24, 323–340.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitbeck, L. B., Simons, R. L., & Kao, M. (1994). The effects of divorced mothers’ dating behaviors and sexual attitudes on the sexual attitudes and behaviors of their adolescent children. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 615–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Whitehead, B., & Popenoe, D. (2001). The state of our unions: The social health of marriage in America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, National Marriage Project.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leslie Gordon Simons
    • 1
  • Callie Harbin Burt
    • 2
  • Rachel Blyskal Tambling
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Human Development and Family ScienceUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeArizona State UniversityPhoenixUSA
  3. 3.Department of Human Development and Family StudiesUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA

Personalised recommendations