Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Parental Distress Subscale

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using data from the Fragile Family Child Wellbeing Study, we examined the psychometric properties of the parental distress subscale of the parenting stress index—short form. Unlike previous studies, we found that the two-factor model did not fit the data significantly better than the one-factor model. Moreover, the results indicated that both the one-factor and the two-factor models provided only a marginal fit to the data. This finding was consistent across two time periods. Implications of these findings and future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Cooperation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillside, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deater-Deckard, K., & Scarr, S. (1996). Parenting stress among dual-earner mothers and fathers: Are there gender differences? Journal of Family Psychology, 1, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Muliak, S. A. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haskett, M. E., Ahern, L. S., Ward, C. S., & Allaire, J. C. (2006). Factor structure and validity of the parenting stress index-short form. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 302–312.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, L. M., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Faldowski, R. A., Shears, J., Ayoub, C., & Hart, A. D. (2009). Validity of the short form of parenting stress index for fathers of toddlers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 102–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthen, B. B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability. Psychological Methods, 5, 343–355.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163–180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raykov, T. (2001). Approximate confidence interval for difference in fit of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 458–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 4, 350–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Heijden, P. G., van Buuren, S., Fekkes, M., Radder, J., & Verrips, E. (2003). Unidimensionality and reliability under Mokken scaling of the Dutch language version of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 12, 189–198.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside-Mansell, L., Ayoub, C., McKelvey, L., Faldowski, R. A., Hart, A., & Shears, J. (2007). Parenting stress of low-income parents of toddlers and preschoolers: Psychometric properties of a short form of the parenting stress index. Parenting Science and Practice, 7, 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaidman-Zait, A., Mirenda, P., Zumbo, B. D., Wellington, S., Dua, V., & Kalynchuk, K. (2010). An item response theory analysis of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form with parents of children with autism spectrum distorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1269–1277.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoinette Y. Farmer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Farmer, A.Y., Andrew Peterson, N. Psychometric Properties of the Parental Distress Subscale. J Child Fam Stud 21, 747–753 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9527-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9527-3

Keywords

Navigation