Journal of Child and Family Studies

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 439–442 | Cite as

An Evaluation of the NAMI Basics Program

  • Teri Brister
  • Mary A. Cavaleri
  • S. Serene Olin
  • Sa Shen
  • Barbara J. Burns
  • Kimberly E. Hoagwood
Original Paper

Abstract

This brief report describes results from an evaluation of NAMI Basics, a peer-delivered family education program for family caregivers of children and adolescents with mental illness. Over six classes, family members are given information (e.g. education about mental illness and treatments), skills training (e.g. family communication skills) and advocacy support. We report data from 36 caregivers who completed pre and posttest instruments measuring self-care, empowerment, and family problem-solving and communication skills. Results showed significant improvements in self-care, empowerment, and “incendiary” family communication after participation in the program. Results suggest that NAMI Basics may improve both parental functioning and familial processes. Implications and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

Peer delivered Peer-to-peer Family support Children’s mental health 

References

  1. Child Welfare Trauma Training Toolkit. (2008). The self-care inventory. Downloaded 1 Jan 2007 from www.NCTSN.org.
  2. Deal, P. (2008). NAMI basics: Evaluation final report. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  3. Dixon, L., Stewart, B., Burland, J., Delahanty, J., Lucksted, A., & Hoffman, M. (2001). Pilot study of the effectiveness of the family-to-family education program. Psychiatric Services, 52(7), 965–967.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gyamfi, P., Walrath, C., Burns, B. J., Stephens, R. L., Geng, Y., & Stambaugh, L. (2010). Family education and support services in systems of care. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 18(1), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoagwood, K., Cavaleri, M. A., Olin, S., Burns, B., Slaton, E., Gruttadaro, D., et al. (2010). Family support in children’s mental health: A review and synthesis. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Koren, P. E., DeChillo, N., & Friesen, B. J. (1992). Measuring empowerment in families whose children have emotional disabilities: A brief questionnaire. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lucksted, A., Stewart, B., & Forbes, C. B. (2008). Benefits and changes for family to family graduates. American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 154–166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McCubbin, M. A., McCubbin, H. I., & Thompson, A. I. (1998). Family problem solving communication index. In Family assessment: Resiliency, coping and adaptation: Inventories for research and practice (pp. 639–686). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  9. National Alliance on Mental Illness. (2010). Downloaded 1 Aug 2010 from http://www.nami.org.
  10. Sisson, D. P., & Fristad, M. A. (2001). A survey of stress and support for parents of children with early-onset bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 3(Suppl 1), 58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teri Brister
    • 1
  • Mary A. Cavaleri
    • 2
  • S. Serene Olin
    • 2
  • Sa Shen
    • 2
  • Barbara J. Burns
    • 3
  • Kimberly E. Hoagwood
    • 2
  1. 1.National Alliance on Mental IllnessArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Duke University School of MedicineDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations