The trend toward adopting a strengths approach to mental health practice with children and adolescents amounts to a paradigm shift from an emphasis on diagnosing disorders to tapping child capacities and assets toward the achievement of treatment goals. While the potential value and challenges associated with this shift has received ample attention in the literature, minimal research has been conducted to assess the benefits and barriers related to the use of strength-based strategies with youth. Utilizing an experimental design, this author examined the impact of strength-based assessment using the Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (BERS) with seriously emotionally or behaviorally disturbed children and adolescents. Results revealed that child functioning outcomes were significantly better for youth who received BERS-guided assessment versus the usual deficit-based assessment protocol only when the treating therapist reported an orientation toward service that reflects highly strength-based attitudes and practices. Furthermore, high adherence to the strength-based assessment protocol was associated with significantly higher parent satisfaction with services and lower rates of missed appointments. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for practitioner effects and treatment fidelity in future studies of strength-based practice effectiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Achenbach, T. M. (1991a). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4-18 and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991b). Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school- age forms & profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.
American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Attkisson, C. C., & Greenfield, T. K. (1999). The UCSF client satisfaction scales: The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-8. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (2nd ed., pp. 1333–1346). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bickman, L. (1992). Designing outcome evaluations for children's mental health services: Improving internal validity. In L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), Evaluating mental health services for children, (pp. 57–68). San Fransicso: Jossey-Bass Publications.
Bickman, L. (1996). A managed continuum of care: More is not always better. American Psychologist, 51, 689–701.
Bickman, L., Sommerfelt, W. T., Firth, J., & Douglas, S. (1997). The Stark County Evaluation Project: Baseline results of a randomized experiment. In T. C. Nixon & D. A. Northrop (Eds.), Evaluating mental health services: How do programs for children “work” in the real world? (pp. 231–258). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Blundo, R. (2001). Learning strengths-based practice: Challenging our personal and professional frames. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 82, 296–304.
Epstein, M. H., Harniss, M. K., Pearson, N., & Ryser, G. (1999). The Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale: Test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 369–377.
Epstein, M. H., Nordness, P. D., Nelson, J. R., & Hertzog, M. (2002). Convergent validity of the behavioral and emotional rating scale with primary grade-level students. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 22, 114–121.
Epstein, M. H., & Sharma, J. M. (1998). Behavioral and emotional rating scale. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Friedman, K. A., Leone, P. E., & Friedman, P. F. (1999). Strengths-based assessment of children with SED: Consistency of reporting by teachers and parents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 169–180.
Friedman, P., Friedman, K. A., & Weaver, V. (2003). Strength-based assessment of African-American adolescents with behavioral disorders. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 96, 667–673.
Goldstein, H. (1992). Victors or victims: Contrasting views of clients in social work practice. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 27–38). New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Graybeal, C. (2001). Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 82, 233–242.
Hodges, K. (1990). Child and adolescent functional assessment scales. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Child Mental Health Services Evaluation Project.
Hodges, K., Doucette-Gates, A., & Liao, Q. (1999). The relationship between the Child and Adolescent Functional Assessment Scale (CAFAS) and indicators of functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 8, 109–122.
Hodges, K., & Wong, M. M. (1996). Psychometric characteristics of a multi-dimensional Assessment Scale. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 5, 445–467.
Larsen, D. L., Attkisson, C. C., Hargreaves, W. A., & Nguyen, T. D. (1979). Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2, 197–207.
Mental Health Services Act, 1 Ca., Welfare & Institutions Code, S 5878.1 (2005).
Moncher, F. J., & Prinz, R. J. (1991). Treatment fidelity in outcome studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 247–266.
Nguyen, T. D., Attkisson, C. C., & Stegner, B. L. (1983). Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a Service Evaluation Questionnaire. Evaluation and Program Planning, 4, 139–150.
Reid, R., Epstein, M. H., Pastor, D. A., & Ryser, G. R. (2000). Strengths-based assessment differences across students with LD and EBD. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 346–355.
Saleebey, D. (1996). The strengths perspective in social work practice: Extensions and cautions. Social Work, 41, 296–305.
Saleebey, D. (2002). The strengths perspective in social work practice (3rd ed.). New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Stroul, B. A., & Friedman, R. M. (1994). A system of care for children and youth with severe emotional disturbance. Washington, DC: Georgetown University, Child and Adolescent Service System Program (CASSP) Technical Assistance Center.
Trout, A. L., Ryan, J. B., La Vigne, S. P., & Epstein, M. H. (2003). Behavioral and emotional rating scale: Two studies of convergent validity. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 12, 399–410.
Walrath, C. M., Mandell, D. S., Holden, E. W., & Santiago, R. L. (2004). Assessing the strengths of children referred for community-based mental health services. Mental Health Services Research, 1, 1–8.
Weick, A. (1992). Building a strengths perspective for social work. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strengths perspective in social work practice (pp. 18–26). New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Weick, A., & Chamberlain, R. (2002). Putting problems in their place: Further explorations in the strengths perspective. In D. Saleebey (Ed.), The strength perspective in social work practice, (pp. 95–105). New York: Longman Publishing Group.
Weisz, J. R., Weiss, B., & Donenberg, G. R. (1992). The lab versus clinic: Effects of child and adolescent psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 47, 1578–1585.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author gratefully acknowledges the advisement of Ferol Mennen, Ph.D., Devon Brooks, Ph.D., and Niraj Verma, Ph.D., of the University of Southern California, in the development of this research project. This study was also supported by the administration of Shasta County Mental Health in Redding, California.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cox, K.F. Investigating the Impact of Strength-Based Assessment on Youth with Emotional or Behavioral Disorders. J Child Fam Stud 15, 278–292 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9021-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-006-9021-5