Advertisement

Dining out as cultural trade

  • Joel WaldfogelEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Perceptions of Anglo-American dominance in movie and music trade motivate restrictions on cultural trade. Yet, the market for another cultural good, food at restaurants, is roughly ten times larger than the markets for music and film. Using TripAdvisor data on restaurant cuisines, along with Euromonitor data on overall and fast-food expenditure, this paper calculates implicit trade patterns in global cuisines for 52 destination countries. We obtain four results. First, the pattern of cuisine trade resembles the “gravity” patterns in physically traded products. Second, after accounting gravity factors, the most popular cuisines are Italian, Japanese, Chinese, Indian, and American. Third, excluding fast food, the largest net exporters of their cuisines are the Italians and the Japanese, while the largest net importers are the USA—with a 2015 deficit of over $140 billion—followed by Brazil, China, and the UK. With fast food included, the US deficit shrinks to $55 billion but remains the largest net importer along with China and, to a lesser extent, the UK and Brazil. Fourth, cuisine trade patterns more closely resemble migration patterns than patterns of food trade or patterns arising from the extent of arable land in origin countries. Cuisine trade patterns run starkly counter to the audiovisual patterns that have motivated concern about Anglo-American cultural dominance.

Keywords

Cultural trade Cuisine Services trade 

Notes

References

  1. Acheson, K., & Maule, C. (2006) Culture in international trade. In: V.A. Ginsburgh, & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (1st edn). Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. E. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69, 106–16.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, J. E., & van Wincoop, E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93, 170–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bala, V., & Van Long, N. (2005). International trade and cultural diversity with preference selection. European Journal of Political Economy, 21(1), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernier, I. (2003). Local content requirements for film, radio, and television as a means of protecting cultural diversity: Theory and reality. Québec: Université Laval.Google Scholar
  6. Berry, S., & Waldfogel, J. (2010). Product quality and market size. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blum, B. S., & Goldfarb, A. (2006). Does the internet defy the law of gravity? Journal of International Economics, 70(2), 384–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chesto, J. (2016). Is TripAdvisor’s revenue risk paying off? Boston Globe. September 24, 2016 https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016/09/23/tripadvisor-revenue-risk-paying-off/eGhkegN3ZLdXHzDs7CpvVI/story.html
  9. Chossat, V., & Gergaud, O. (2003). Expert opinion and gastronomy: The recipe for success. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27(2), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Disdier, A. C., & Head, K. (2008). The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Disdier, A. C., Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2010). Exposure to foreign media and changes in cultural traits: Evidence from naming patterns in France. Journal of International Economics, 80, 226–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Disdier, A. C., Tai, S., Fontagne, L., & Mayer, T. (2010). Bilateral trade of cultural goods. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 145, 575–95.Google Scholar
  13. Ferreira, F., Petrin, A., & Waldfogel, J. (2017). The growth of China and its impact of world music consumers and producers. Unpublished paper, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  14. Ferreira, F., & Waldfogel, J. (2013). Pop internationalism: Has half a century of world music trade displaced local culture? Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, 123, 634–664.Google Scholar
  15. Gergaud, O., Guzman, L. M., & Verardi, V. (2007). Stardust over Paris gastronomic restaurants. Journal of Wine Economics, 2(1), 24–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gergaud, O., Storchmann, K., & Verardi, V. (2015). Expert opinion and product quality: Evidence from New York City restaurants. Economic Inquiry, 53(2), 812–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Godoy, M., & Beardsley, E. (2015). Liberte, egalite, gastronomie? France rallies to defend its food's honor. NPR.com, March 23. https://www.npr.org/sections/thesalt/2015/03/23/394346395/liberte-egalite-gastronomie-france-defends-its-foods-honor.
  18. Gordon, P. H., & Meunier, S. (2001). Globalization and French cultural identity. French Politics, Culture and Society, 19(1), 22–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon, P. H., & Meunier-Aitsahalia, S. (2001). The French challenge: Adapting to globalization. Washington, D.C: Brookings.Google Scholar
  20. Hanson, G.H., & Xiang, C. (2008). Testing the Melitz model of trade: an application to U.S. motion picture exports. NBER Working Paper No. 14461.Google Scholar
  21. Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2013). Gravity equations: Toolkit, cookbook, workhorse. In: G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff, (Eds.), Handbook of international economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  22. Karp, M. (2018). The surprising reason that there are so many Thai restaurants in America. VICE.com, March 29. https://munchies.vice.com/en_us/article/paxadz/the-surprising-reason-that-there-are-so-many-thai-restaurants-in-america.
  23. Mayzlin, D., Dover, Y., & Chevalier, J. (2014). Promotional reviews: An empirical investigation of online review manipulation. American Economic Review, 104(8), 2421–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meloni, G., Paolini, D., & de Dios Tena, J. (2018). American beauty: Trade flows and export costs of US movies. Journal of Cultural Economics 42(4), 701–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nomura, M. (2017). How to find a great restaurant in Tokyo, no matter where you are. Eater, February 21. https://www.eater.com/2017/2/21/14686118/tokyo-tabelog-restaurant-ratings.
  26. Peralta, E. (2015). UNESCO designates traditional French and Mexican cuisines cultural treasures. NPR.com, November 17. https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2010/11/17/131391343/unesco-designates-traditional-french-and-mexican-cuisines-cultural-treasures.
  27. Ramondo, N., Rodríguez-Clare, A, & Tintelnot, F. (2015). Multinational production: Data and stylized facts. American Economic Review, 105(5), 530–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, M. (2006). Commercial broadcasting and local content: Cultural quotas, advertising and public stations. Economic Journal, 116, 605–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Samuel, H. (2010). UNESCO declares French cuisine 'world intangible heritage. The Telegraph, November 16. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8138348/UNESCO-declares-French-cuisine-world-intangible-heritage.html.
  30. Samuel, H. (2013). Fast food overtakes traditional cuisine in France for the first time. The Telegraph, February 28. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/9900152/Fast-food-overtakes-traditional-cuisine-in-France-for-the-first-time.html.
  31. Santos, J. M. C., & Tenreyro, S. (2006). The log of gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schiff, N. (2015). Cities and product variety: Evidence from restaurants. Journal of Economic Geography, 15, 1085–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takara, Y. (2018). Do cultural differences affect the trade of cultural goods? A study in trade of music. Journal of Cultural Economics, 42(3), 393–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Waldfogel, J. (2008). The median voter and the median consumer: Local private goods and population composition. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Waldfogel, J., Aguiar, L., & Gomez-Herrera, E. (2017). Does digitization threaten local culture? Music in the transition from iTunes to Spotify. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  36. Waterman, D. (2005). Hollywood's road to riches. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations