Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new perspective on the cultural heritage–development nexus: the role of creativity

Journal of Cultural Economics volume 43, pages 21–56 (2019)Cite this article

Abstract

The importance of culture, history, religion, and identity in the potential of any territory to develop is now generally accepted. Place and culture are indeed persistently intertwined. Moreover, the potentially positive impact of cultural heritage on economic development has gained more and more attention throughout different disciplines. Such impact, however, is often just assumed or thought to occur exclusively through cultural tourism, which is in fact both conceptually and empirically able to explain only partially such relationship. This paper enters this debate by elaborating conceptually and empirically on the idea that creativity—possibly expressed according to different patterns—can play a mediating role, explaining the local capability to exploit cultural heritage for economic purposes. In order to empirically address this issue, the Italian provinces (NUTS3 level) are exploited as the units of analysis and the whole process (from cultural heritage to development through creativity) is econometrically tested by a structural equation model.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Notes

  1. The most diffused definition of creative industries is the one provided by the UK Department of Culture, Media, and Sport (UK-DCMS 1998; 2001). According to such definition, creative industries are those having their origin in individual creativity, skill, and talent and which have a potential for wealth and job creation through the generation and exploitation of intellectual property.

  2. In fact, given the presence of interaction terms and in order to get robust standard errors, a quasi-maximum likelihood (QML) SEM was estimated. QML uses ML to fit the model parameters but relaxes the normality assumptions when estimating the standard errors. QML handles non-normality by adjusting standard errors.

  3. For a few exceptions, please refer to the next section.

  4. Given the relatively low number of observations and the estimation requirements of the SEM, regional fixed effects had to be included at the NUTS2 level.

  5. 01. Unskilled work; 02. machine operators; 03. skilled work; 04. agricultural workers; 05. retail activities; 06. clerks; 07. average specialization technical, administrative, or sport tasks; 08. high specialization, technical, administrative, intellectual, scientific, or artistic tasks; 09. managing tasks; 10. army.

  6. 01. Agriculture, forestry, and fishing; 02. mining and quarrying; 03. manufacturing; 04. electricity, gas, steam, and air-conditioning supply; 05. water supply, sewerage, waste management, and remediation activities; 06. construction; 07. wholesale and retail trade, repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles; 08. transportation and storage; 09. accommodation and food service activities; 10. information and communication; 11. financial and insurance activities; 12. real estate activities; 13. professional, scientific, and technical activities; 14. administrative and support service activities; 15. public administration and defense; compulsory social security; 16. education; 17. human health and social work activities; 18. arts, entertainment, and recreation; 19. other service activities; 20. activities of households as employers; undifferentiated goods and service-producing activities of households for own use; 21. activities of extra territorial organizations and bodies.

  7. European Commission (2013), http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/regional_entrepreneurship_development_index.pdf.

  8. http://www.gemconsortium.org/.

  9. In order to compute the direct, indirect, and total effects more rigorously, the calculation was carried out on the original (non-standardized) coefficients. Non-standardized outputs of the regressions are available from the author upon request. In addition, t statistics are not reported for the augmented models since their computation would require much more complicated computation, not automatically available in STATA.

  10. Also in this case, for greater rigorousness, the computation was carried out on the original (non-standardized) coefficients. The complete computation is available from the author upon request.

    Since it is in fact impossible to build new ancient monuments overnight, we also computed the marginal effects considering the difference between a situation with a low endowment of cultural heritage with a situation with a high endowment of cultural heritage (10th and 90th percentiles, corresponding, respectively, to about 0.13 and 0.63 units of cultural heritage per square km), both in the case of average endowment of the different types of creative talents. The overall results are 0.08% higher, 0.12% higher, and 0.12% higher, respectively, for the three specifications.

  11. R&D activities are missing in Santagata’s (2009) classification and were added within this work.

  12. For each “macro”-sector, Santagata considered the whole “Creative Industry Production System” (CIPS), which includes (a) design and production, (b) inputs and other activities related to production, (c) retailing, and (d) activities related to the retailing.

References

  • Andersson, Å. E., Batten, D. F., Kobayashi, K., & Yoshikawa, K. (1993). Logistical dynamics, creativity and infrastructure. In Å. E. Andersson, D. F. Batten, K. Kobayashi, & K. Yoshikawa (Eds.), The cosmo-creative society: Logistical networks in a dynamic economy. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, M., & Karlsson, C. (2007). Knowledge in regional economic growth—The role of knowledge accessibility. Industry and Innovation, 14(2), 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J. (1994). From history to heritage—From heritage to identity. In G. J. Ashworth & P. J. Larkham (Eds.), Building a new heritage—Tourism, culture and identity in the New Europe. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth, G. J. (2013). Heritage and local development: A reluctant relationship. In I. Rizzo & A. Mignola (Eds.), Handbook on the economics of cultural heritage. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D., Dohse, D., & Niebhur, A. (2010). Cultural diversity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis for Germany. The Annals of Regional Science, 45, 55–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Báez, A., & Herrero, L. C. (2012). using contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis to design a policy for restoring cultural heritage. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 13(3), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbetta, G. P., Cammelli, M., & Della Torre, S. (2013). Distretti culturali: dalla teoria alla pratica. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, P., Schweitzer, M. E., & Shane, S. (2012). Knowledge matters: The long-run determinants of state income growth. Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 240–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baycan, T. (2011). Creative cities: Context and perspectives. In L. Fusco Girard, T. Baycan, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Sustainable city and creativity—Promoting creative urban initiatives. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix, R., De Miguel, B., & Hervás, J. L. (2013). Creative service business and regional performance: Evidence for the European regions. Service Business, 7(3), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, R., Hervás-Oliver, J. L., & De Miguel-Molina, B. (2015). Micro-geographies of creative industries clusters in Europe: From hot spots to assemblages. Papers in Regional Science, 94(4), 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix-Domenech, R., & Soler-Marco, V. (2017). Creative service industries and regional productivity. Papers in Regional Science, 96(2), 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma, R. A., & Fritsch, M. (2009). Creative class and regional growth: Empirical evidence from seven European countries. Economic Geography, 85(4), 391–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, N. (2004). Creative cities structured policy dialogue backgrounder. Canadian Policy Research Networks, Background Paper F|46.

  • Camagni, R. (2008). Towards a concept of territorial capital. In R. Capello, R. Camagni, B. Chizzolini, & U. Fratesi (Eds.), Modelling regional scenarios for the enlarged Europe (pp. 33–47). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R. (2011). Creativity, culture and urban milieux. In L. Fusco Girard, T. Baycan, & P. Nijkamp (Eds.), Sustainable city and creativity. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2013). Territorial patterns of innovation: A taxonomy of innovative regions in Europe. Annals of Regional Science, 51, 119–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., & Lenzi, C. (2014). Spatial heterogeneity in knowledge, innovation, and economic growth nexus: Conceptual reflections and empirical evidence. Journal of Regional Science, 54, 186–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R., & Perucca, G. (2017). Cultural capital and local development nexus: Does the local environment matter? In H. Shibusawa, K. Sakurai, T. Mizunoya, & S. Uchida (Eds.), Socioeconomic environmental policies and evaluations in regional science—Essays in honor of Yoshiro Higano. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capone, F. (2007). Mapping and analyzing creative systems in Italy (1991–2001). In P. Cooke & L. Lazzeretti (Eds.), Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappellin, R. (2009). The analysis of regional knowledge networks. In R. Cappellin & R. Wink (Eds.), International knowledge and innovation networks—Knowledge creation and innovation in medium-technology clusters. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carta, M. (1999). L’armatura culturale del territorio. Il patrimonio culturale come matrice di identità e strumento di sviluppo. Milano: Franco Angeli

  • Cellini, R. (2011). Is UNESCO recognition effective in fostering tourism? A comment on Yang, Lin and Han. Tourism Management, 32, 452–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerisola, S. (2016). Creativity and local economic development: The role of synergy among different talents. Papers in Regional Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerisola, S. (2017). Multiple creative talents and their determinants at the local level. Journal of Cultural Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-017-9299-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicerchia, A. (2002). Il bellissimo vecchio. Argomenti per una geografia del patrimonio culturale. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton, N. (2008). The “creative class” in the UK: An initial analysis. Geografiska Annaler Series B Human Geography, 90(1), 63–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comunian, R., Faggian, A., & Li, Q. C. (2010). Unrewarded careers in the creative class: The strange case of bohemian graduates. Papers in Regional Science, 89(2), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correia, C. M., & da Silva Costa, J. (2014). Measuring creativity in the EU member states. Investigaciones Regionales, 30, 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. (2014). Conclusions on cultural heritage as a strategic resource for a sustainable Europe. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/educ/142705.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018

  • Crociata, A., Agovino, M., Russo, A., & Quaglieri Domínguez, A. (2015). Creative workforce and economic development in precrisis Europe: Main trends and causality relationships. International Regional Science Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017615607054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity—Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, S. (2011). Developments in measuring the “creative” workforce. Cultural Trends, 20(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dakhli, M., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Human capital, social capital, and innovation: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 16(2), 107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Miguel-Molina, B. (2012). The importance of creative industry agglomerations in explaining the wealth of European regions. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1263–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Della Torre, S. (2010). Economics of planned conservation. In M. Mälkki & K. Schmidt-Thomé (Eds.), Integrating aims—Built heritage in social and economic development. Aalto University School of Science and Technology. http://www.hs-intl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/isbn9789526032849.pdf. Accessed 4 July 2018

  • Della Torre, S. (2015). Lezioni imparate sul campo dei distretti culturali. Il Capitale Culturale, Supplementi, 03, 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2002). The DigiCULT report. Technological landscapes for tomorrow’s cultural economy: Unlocking the value of cultural heritage. http://www.digicult.info/pages/report2002/dc_fullreport_230602_screen.pdf. Accessed 24 July 2018

  • European Commission. (2012). Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions—Promoting cultural and creative sectors for growth and jobs in the EU. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/registre/docs_autres_institutions/commission_europeenne/com/2012/0537/COM_COM%282012%290537_EN.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018

  • European Commission (2013) REDI: the regional entrepreneurship and development index–measuring regional entrepreneurship final report. http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/studies/pdf/regional_entrepreneurship_development_index.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • European Commission. (2016). Boosting the competitiveness of cultural and creative industries for growth and jobs. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/18001. Accessed 24 July 2018

  • European Commission, Directorate General for Research and Innovation. (2015). Getting cultural heritage to work for Europe. Report of the Horizon 2020 Expert Group on Cultural Heritage. http://www.file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/KI0115128ENN_002.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • Faggian, A., Comunian, R., Jewell, S., & Kelly, U. (2013). Bohemian graduates in the UK: Disciplines and location determinants of creative careers. Regional Studies, 47(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian, A., Comunian, R., & Li, Q.C. (2014). Interregional migration of human creative capital: the case of “Bohemian graduates”. Geoforum, 55, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faggian, A., Partridge, M., & Malecki, E. (2017). Creating an environment for economic growth: Human capital, creativity or entrepreneurship? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 41(6), 997–1009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faro Convention—Council of Europe. (2005). Council of Europe framework convention on the value of cultural heritage for society 8. http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/0900001680083746. Accessed 3 May 2018

  • Fleming, L. (2001). Recombinant uncertainty in technological search. Management Science, 47(1), 117–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, L., Mingo, S., & Chen, D. (2007). Collaborative brokerage, generative creativity, and creative success. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 443–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., Mellander, C., & Stolarick, K. (2008). Inside the black box of regional development: Human capital, the creative class and tolerance. Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 615–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., Kritikos, A., & Pijnenburg, K. (2015). Business cycles, unemployment and entrepreneurial entry—Evidence from Germany. International Entrepreneurship Management Journal, 11, 267–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1988). Creative lives and creative works: A synthetic scientific approach. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Review of Richard Florida’s the rise of the creative class. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 593–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greffe, X. (2004). Is heritage an asset or a liability? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 5, 301–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greffe, X. (2010). Urban cultural landscapes: An economic approach, WP No. 1/2010, Dipartimento di Economia “S. Cognetti de Martiis”, CSS-EBLA, Università di Torino.

  • Harris, R. (2011). Models of regional growth: Past, present and future. Journal of Economic Surveys, 25, 913–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, L. C., Sanz, J. Á., Bedate, A., & del Barrio, M. J. (2012). Who pays more for a cultural festival, tourists or locals? A certainty analysis of contingent valuation application. International Journal of Tourism Research, 14(2), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrero, L. C., Sanz, J. Á., Devesa, M., Bedate, A., & del Barrio, M. J. (2006). The economic impact of cultural events—A case-study of Salamanca 2002, European capital of culture. European Urban and Regional Studies, 13(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitters, E., & Richards, G. (2002). The creation and management of cultural clusters. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(4), 234–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hospers, G. (2003). Creative cities: Breeding places in the knowledge economy. Knowledge, Technology & Policy, 16(3), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howkins, J. (2007). The creative economy—How people make money from ideas. London: Penguin Books [first edition 2001].

    Google Scholar 

  • International Charter of Venice (International Charter for the Conservation and Restoration of Monuments and Sites). (1964). http://www.icomos.org/charters/venice_e.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2018

  • JPI Cultural Heritage and Global Change. (2014). Strategic research agenda. http://www.jpi-culturalheritage.eu/wp-content/uploads/SRA-2014-06.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018

  • KEA (2006) The economy of culture in Europe. Study prepared for the European Commission.

  • KEA. (2009). Towards a culture-based creativity index. In Measuring creativity, conference proceedings, Brussels 28–29 May 2009.

  • Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C. (2000). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landry, C. (2008). The creative city. A toolkit for urban innovators. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti, L. (2007). Culture, creativity and local economic development: Evidence from creative industries in Florence. In P. Cooke & D. Schwartz (Eds.), Creative regions. Technology, culture and knowledge entrepreneurship. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Boix, R. (2012). Reasons for clustering of creative industries in Italy and Spain. European Planning Studies, 20(8), 1243–1262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, U. (2003). The spatial distribution of innovative activity in U.S. metropolitan areas: Evidence from patent data. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 33, 97–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlet, G., & van Woerkens, C. (2007). The Dutch creative class and how it fosters urban employment growth. Urban Studies, 44(13), 2605–2626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2012). Education or creativity: what matters most for economic performance? Economic Geography, 88(4), 369–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2013) Regional development and creativity. International Regional Science Review, 36, 354–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, R. (2002). Assessing values in conservation planning: Methodological issues and choices. In M. de la Torre (Ed.), Assessing the values of cultural heritage, research report. Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellander, C. (2009). Creative and knowledge industries: An occupational distribution approach. Research and Practice, 23(4), 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melstrom, R. T. (2014). Valuing historic battlefields: An application of the travel cost method to three American civil war battlefields. Journal of Cultural Economics, 38(3), 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moro, M., Mayor, K., Lyons, S., & Tol, R. S. (2013). Does the housing market reflect cultural heritage? A case study of greater Dublin. Environment and Planning A, 45(12), 2884–2903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morpurgo, D. (2015). Il valore del centro storico-artistico. Prezzi edonici a Perugia, Bologna e Trieste, Tesi di Laurea in Pianificazione Urbana e Politiche territoriali, Politecnico di Milano.

  • Nathan, M., & Lee, N. (2013). Cultural diversity, innovation, and entrepreneurship: Firm-level evidence from London. Economic Geography, 89(4), 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, D. (2003). Contingent valuation and cultural resources: A meta-analytic review of the literature. Journal of Cultural Economics, 27, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, D., & Krupka, D. J. (2011). Making—Or picking—Winners: Evidence of internal and external price effects in historic preservation policies. Real Estate Economics, 39(2), 379–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, D., & Rizzo, I. (2017). Economics of cultural tourism: Issues and perspectives. Journal of Cultural Economics, 41, 95–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr, J. B. (2002). Agglomeration economies: Ambiguities and confusions. Environment and Planning A, 34(4), 717–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, B. (2006). The return on investment of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(2), 452–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, B. (2008). On some challenges and conditions for the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao to be an effective economic re-activator. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 32(2), 506–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, B. (2010). Valuing museums as economic engines: Willingness to pay or discounting of cash-flows? Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11, 155–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plaza, B., Galvez-Galvez, C., & Gonzalez-Flores, A. (2011). Research note: Testing the employment impact of the Guggenheim Museum Bilbao via TSA. Tourism Economics, 17(1), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1908). Science et method. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poor, P. J., & Smith, J. M. (2004). Travel cost analysis of a cultural heritage site: The case of historic St. Mary’s city of Maryland. Journal of Cultural Economics, 28(3), 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, A. C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annnaler: Series B, Human Geography, 90(2), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riganti, P., & Nijkamp, P. (2006). The value of urban cultural heritage: An intelligent environment approach. Studies in Regional Science, 36(2), 451–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Crescenzi, R. (2008). Research and development, spillovers, innovation systems, and the genesis of regional growth in Europe. Regional Studies, 42, 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2004). Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2119–2171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacco, P. L. (2012). Culture and the structural funds in Italy, European Expert Network on Culture (EENC). http://nuovoeutile.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/2-PLSacco-Culture-and-the-Structural-Funds-in-Italy.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2018

  • Sacco, P. L., & Segre, G. (2009). Creativity, cultural investment and local development: A new theoretical framework for endogenous growth. In L. Senn & U. Fratesi (Eds.), Growth in interconnected territories: Innovation dynamics, local factors and agents. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santagata, W. (2002). Cultural districts, property rights and sustainable economic growth, WP No. 01/2002, Dipartimento di Economia “S. Cognetti de Martiis”, Università di Torino.

  • Santagata, W. (2009). Libro bianco sulla creatività. Per un modello italiano di sviluppo. Milan: Università Bocconi Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., & Fleming, L. (2010). Lone inventor as sources of breakthroughs: Myth or reality? Management Science, 56(1), 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, H. M., Partridge, M. D., & Faggian, A. (2013). Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 778–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman, P. (2010). Soft innovation: Economics, product aesthetics, and the creative industries. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (2001). Economics and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trullén, J., & Boix, R. (2008). Knowledge externalities and networks of cities in the creative metropolis. In P. Cooke & L. Lazzeretti (Eds.), Creative cities, Cultural Clusters and Local Economic Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twiss, B. (1992). Managing Technological Innovation – (4th ed.). London: Pitman Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • UK-DCMS. (1998). Creative industries mapping document. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-1998. Accessed 24 July 2018

  • UK-DCMS. (2001). Creative industries mapping document. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-2001. Accessed 24 July 2018

  • UNCTAD (2010) Creative Economy Report. http://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditctab20103_en.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018

  • UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. http://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf. Accessed 18 June 2018

  • UNESCO. (2013). The Hangzhou declaration—Placing culture at the heart of sustainable development policies. http://www.unesco.org/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CLT/images/FinalHangzhouDeclaration20130517.pdf. Accessed 3 may 2018

  • United Nations. (2011). Resolution on culture and development, 65/166. http://www.file:///C:/Users/User/Downloads/event-794-1.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2018

  • Voltaire, L., Lévi, L., Alban, F., & Boncoeur, J. (2016). Valuing cultural world heritage sites: An application of the travel cost method to Mont-Saint-Michel. Applied Economics, 49(16), 1593–1605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. B. (2004). Cognition, creativity, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (1998). Recombinant growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 331–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C., Lin, H., & Han, C. (2010). Analysis of international tourist arrivals in China: The role of world heritage sites. Tourism Management, 31, 827–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Architecture Built Environment and Construction Engineering (ABC) Department, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, Italy

    Silvia Cerisola

Authors
  1. Silvia Cerisola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvia Cerisola.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Additional information

The author is obliged to the whole research group in Urban and Regional Economics at the ABC Department, Politecnico di Milano, for support and suggestions. Special gratitude goes to Roberta Capello, Roberto Camagni and Rocco Mosconi for their advice.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Santagata (2009) classification of creative industries

In order to identify creative industries, this work refers to Santagata’s (2009) classification.Footnote 11 The author singles out some main creative “macro”-sectors, namely: industrial design and craft; fashion; food and wine; computer and software; publishing; TV, radio, and cinema; cultural heritage; music and entertainment; and architecture and engineering.

Within the above categories, the ones taken into account are those activities that Santagata listed in the “Design and Production” phase of the production chainFootnote 12 (see Table 8 for details). This choice is related to the idea that the core components of creativity lay in the conception of (creative) products. According to this view, disregarding the other phases of the production chain seemed particularly reasonable.

Table 8 Sectors considered as “creative industries”
Full size table

Santagata’s classification has got many significant advantages: it includes both manufacturing and services, and it identifies sectors very precisely, according to the ATECO classification at 4–5-digit level.

Appendix 2

See Table 9.

Table 9 Correlation table
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cerisola, S. A new perspective on the cultural heritage–development nexus: the role of creativity. J Cult Econ 43, 21–56 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9328-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9328-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

search

Navigation