This paper estimates a hedonic model of revenues for 1431 American movies in 45 non-American countries over the period 2002–2013. Such an extensive analysis is proven to be useful to estimate the effect of indicators of geographical and cultural distance on total revenue and the number of American films exported to non-American countries once the model specification also controls for relevant film features. It is found that indicators of cultural and geographical distance, in addition to the Human Development Index, have a significant effect on both the number of American films shown and the revenue obtained. Estimation results have been also used to appraise the importance of film features in different groups of countries from the perspective of their degree of development and distance from the USA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
A remarkable exception to this is Holloway (2014), who, using information at the film level, estimate the impact of quality on the propensity of a given movie entering a foreign market.
See notes on CEPII’s distance measures: The GeoDist database, Mayer and Zignano (2011).
The nearest neighbor was estimated with the R package FNN. Results of this experiment and all the other estimations not explicitly reported in this paper can be obtained from the authors upon request.
"Hollywood goes global. Bigger abroad." The Economist, Feb 17th 2011.
In a regression between these two variables, the coefficient associated to CD is − 0.02 with a p value equal to 0.048. However, the coefficient of a regression between CD and GD is insignificant, p = 0.81.
Altman, N. S. (1992). An introduction to kernel and nearest-neighbor nonparametric regression. The American Statistician, 46(3), 175–185.
Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspective, 21(3), 105–130.
Fu, W. W., & Lee, T. (2008). Economic and cultural influences on the theatrical consumption of foreign films in Singapore. Journal of Media Economics, 21, 1–27.
Hanson, G., & Xiang, C. (2011). Trade barriers and trade ows with product heterogeneity: An application to US motion picture exports. Journal of International Economics, 83, 14–26.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
Hellmanzik, Ch., & Schmitz, M. (2015). Virtual proximity and audiovisual services trade. European Economic Review, 77, 82–101.
Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences, comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holloway, I. R. (2014). Foreign entry, quality, and cultural distance: Product-level evidence from US movie exports. Review of World Economics, 150(2), 371–392.
Huettner, F., & Sunder, M. (2012). Axiomatic arguments for decomposing goodness of fit according to Shapley and Owen values. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 6, 1239–1250.
Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411.
Lee, F. L. F. (2009). Cultural discount of cinematic achievement: The Academy Awards and U.S. movies’ East Asian box office. Journal of Cultural Economics, 33, 239–263.
Marvasti, A., & Canterbery, E. R. (2005). Cultural and other barriers to motion pictures trade. Economic Inquiry, 43(1), 39–54.
Mayer, T., & Zignano, S. (2011). Notes on CEPII’s distance measures: the GeoDist database. CEPII working paper, 2011-25.
Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
Palsson, C., Price, J., & Shores, J. (2013). Ratings and revenues: Evidence from movie ratings. Contemporary Economic Policy, 31(1), 13–21.
Wagner, C. H. (1982). The Simpson’s paradox in real live. The American Statistician, 36(1), 46–48.
Walls, W. D., & McKenzie, J. (2012). The changing role of hollywood in the global movie market. Journal of Media Economics, 25(4), 198–219.
Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Conflict of interest
The author Dimitri Paolini has received research grant from PRIN (Research projects of national interest) by Minister of Education and from Fondazione Banco di Sardegna. The authors G. Meloni and JD. Tena declare that they have no conflict of interest.
About this article
Cite this article
Meloni, G., Paolini, D. & Tena, J.D. American beauty: trade flows and export costs of US movies. J Cult Econ 42, 701–716 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-018-9324-6
- American movies
- Geographical and cultural distance