Determinants of sales and price at auction for three Australian Indigenous artists: to pool or not to pool?

Short Paper
  • 52 Downloads

Abstract

Albert Namatjira (1902–1959), Emily Kame Kngwarreye (c1910–1996) and Rover (Julama) Thomas (c1926–1998) are three of Australia’s best-known Indigenous artists. Each is known for one style of painting—Namatjira for watercolor on paper, Kngwarreye for acrylic (synthetic polymer) on canvas and Thomas for natural earth pigments on canvas. We estimate a sample selectivity model using data from the Australian Art Sales Digest to study the determinants of sales and the hammer price of artworks offered at auction from these artists. The results show that pre-sale information on the artwork and auction effects are significant and that the three artists studied are very different from each other. Thus, data should not be pooled when estimating these models.

Keywords

Pooled data Selectivity correction Auction prices Indigenous artwork 

JEL Classification

Z11 D440 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge Bronwyn Coate for helpful discussions on the context of Indigenous art in Australia. We are grateful to seminar participants at RMIT University and Monash University for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. Finally, we would like to thank the Australian Art Sales Digest for supplying the data used in this paper and note that responsibility for the information and views set out in this paper lies entirely with the authors.

Funding

This work is part of a research project on “Indigenous art at auction” which has been supported by an RMIT University internal research grant awarded to Tim R.L. Fry.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ashenfelter, O., & Graddy, K. (2006). Art auctions. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Thorsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 909–945). Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckert, J., & Rossel, J. (2013). The price of art. European Societies, 15, 178–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Candela, G., Castellani, M., & Pattitoni, P. (2012). Tribal art market: Signs and signals. Journal of Cultural Economics, 36, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Franssen, T., & Velthuis, O. (2016). Making materiality matter: a sociological analysis of prices on the Dutch fiction book market, 1980–2009. Socio-Economic Review.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwu025.Google Scholar
  5. Geismar, H. (2001). What’s in a price: An ethnography of tribal art at auction. Journal of Material Culture, 6, 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heath, C., & Luff, P. (2007). Ordering competition: The interactional accomplishment of the sale of art and antiques at auction. The British Journal of Sociology, 58, 63–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Herrero, M. (2010a). Auctions, rituals and emotions in the art market. Thesis Eleven, 103, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Herrero, M. (2010b). Performing calculation in the art market. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3, 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klemperer, P. (1999). Auction theory: A guide to the literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13, 227–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Marinelli, N., & Palomba, G. (2011). A model for pricing Italian contemporary art paintings at auction. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 51, 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Morphy, H. (2001). Seeing aboriginal art in the gallery. Humanities Research, 8, 37–50.Google Scholar
  12. Sproule, R., & Valsan, C. (2006). Hedonic models and pre-auction estimates: Abstract art revisited. Economics Bulletin, 26, 1–10.Google Scholar
  13. Teti, E., Sacco, P. L., & Galli, T. C. (2014). Ephemeral estimation of the value of art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 32, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vickrey, W. (1961). Counterspeculations, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance, 16, 8–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics, Finance and MarketingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Health EconomicsMonash UniversityClaytonAustralia

Personalised recommendations