Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 101–126 | Cite as

An economic perspective on rock concerts and climate change: Should carbon offsets compensating emissions be included in the ticket price?

Original Article

Abstract

Musicians, singers and bands can use their popularity to promote various causes and products, either through endorsements or more individual initiatives. Environmental activism is becoming more widespread as humans are trying to tackle and mitigate climate change. In this paper, we ask how best a band can compensate for the carbon emissions generated by fans travelling to its shows. We first report on the various “green” initiatives and practices of the music industry. We then focus on greenhouse gas emissions that result from tours and concerts since they are one of the largest environmental impacts generated by the music industry. We take the perspective of the artist or band wishing to internalize their carbon emissions and present a model of carbon offsets in the context of rock concerts, which amounts to the private provision of a public good. In our model, bands have the option to include offsets in the ticket price or to offer voluntary offsets. To illustrate our point, we present a field study conducted by a Quebec rock band at shows in Montreal and in Europe to show how the artists can reduce the environmental impact of their concert by buying carbon credits equivalent to their fans’ footprint. We show that at 1 % of the ticket price on average, the cost of carbon offsets is marginal and discuss the numerous challenges that arise for those artists wanting to engage in carbon offsetting.

Keywords

Concerts Climate change Carbon offsets Environment Green bands 

JEL Classification

Z11 Q54 Q51 

Supplementary material

10824_2015_9265_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (125 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 124 kb)

References

  1. Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2006). Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 50–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Best Foot Forward. (2007). Ecological Footprint & Carbon Audit of Radiohead North American Tours, 2003 & 2006. July 2007.Google Scholar
  3. Bottrill, C., Liverman, D., & Boykoff, M. (2010). Carbon soundings: Greenhouse gas emissions of the UK music industry. Environmental Research Letters, 5(1), 014019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1971). Le Marché des Biens Symboliques. L’Année Sociologique, 22, 49–126.Google Scholar
  5. Boykoff, M. T., & Goodman, M. K. (2009). Conspicuous redemption? Reflections on the promises and perils of the ‘Celebritization’ of climate change. Geoforum, 40(3), 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brouwer, R., Brander, L., & Van Beukering, P. (2008). “A convenient truth”: Air travel passengers’ willingness to pay to offset their CO2 emissions. Climatic Change, 90, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collins, A., Jones, C., & Munday, M. (2009). Assessing the environmental impacts of mega sporting events: Two options? Tourism Management, 30(6), 828–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connolly, M., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Rockonomics: The economics of popular music. In V. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture, Chapter 20 (pp. 667–719). North-Holland: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Courty, P., & Pagliero, M. (2013). The pricing of art and the art of pricing: Pricing styles in the concert industry. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 2, 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dupras, J., LeBlanc, K., & Jobin, M. (2008). La tournée verte des Cowboys Fringants. Report prepared for the Fondation Cowboys Fringants.Google Scholar
  11. Environment Canada. (2010). Renewable fuels regulations: Regulatory impact analysis statement. Retrieved from www.gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p1/2010/2010-04-10/html/reg1-eng.html.
  12. Greenhouse Gas Protocol. (2015). CO2 Emissions from transport or mobile sources. Retrieved from http://www.ghgprotocol.org/calculation-tools/all-tools.
  13. Harris, R. (2012). Large scale sporting events and education for sustainable development—case of the Melbourne 2006 commonwealth games. In Australian event symposium 2012 (p. 57).Google Scholar
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (1999). Aviation and the global atmosphere. Summary for policymakers. A special report of IPCC working groups I and III. Retrieved from https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/special-reports/spm/av-en.pdf.
  15. Julie’s Bicycle. (2007). First step: UK music industry greenhouse gas emissions. http://www.juliesbicycle.com/resources/first-step-uk-music-industry-report.
  16. Julie’s Bicycle. (2009a). Jam Packed: Audience travel emissions from festivals. http://www.juliesbicycle.com/resources/jam-packed-audience-travel-emissions-from-festivals.
  17. Julie’s Bicycle. (2009b). The carbon impacts of recorded music products in a time of transition. http://www.juliesbicycle.com/resources/the-carbon-impacts-of-recorded-music-in-a-time-of-transition.
  18. Julie’s Bicycle. (2010). Moving arts: Managing the carbon impacts of our touring. Volume 1: Bands. http://www.juliesbicycle.com/resources/moving-arts-managing-the-carbon-impacts-of-our-touring-volume-1-bands.
  19. Kearins, K., & Pavlovich, K. (2002). The role of stakeholders in Sydney’s Green Games. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(3), 157–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khan, R. (2013). Environmental activism in music. In Edmondson, J. (Ed.), Music in American Life: The songs, stories, styles, and stars that shaped our culture (pp. 412–417). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  21. Killmann, F., & von Collani, E. (2001). A note on the convolution of the uniform and related distributions and their use in quality control. Economic Quality Control, 16(1), 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. King, A. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2001). Does it really pay to be green? An empirical study of firm environmental and financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 5, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kitzmueller, M., & Shimshack, J. (2012). Economic perspectives on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(1), 51–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kotchen, M. J. (2009). Voluntary provision of public goods for bads: A theory of environmental offsets. The Economic Journal, 119(537), 883–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laing, J., & Frost, W. (2010). How green was my festival: Exploring challenges and opportunities associated with staging green events. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(2), 261–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leslie, P., & Sorensen, A. (2014). Resale and rent-seeking: An application to ticket markets. The Review of Economic Studies, 81(1), 266–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li, H., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Silva, C. L., & Weimer, D. L. (2004). Exploring the beta model using proportional budget information in a contingent valuation study. Ecological Economics, 28, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lioui, A., & Sharma, Z. (2012). Environmental corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Disentangling direct and indirect effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2(2), 240–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mair, J., & Laing, J. (2012). The greening of music festivals: Motivations, barriers and outcomes. Applying the Mair and Jago Model. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(5), 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mills, M. P. (2013). The cloud begins with coal: Big data, big networks, big infrastructure, and big power. An overview of the electricity used by the global digital ecosystem. National Mining Association and American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity.Google Scholar
  32. Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ministère de l’Écologie, du Développement durable et de l’Énergie—MEDDE. (2012). Information CO2 des prestations de transports. Retrieved from http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Guide_Information_CO2-2.pdf.
  34. Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et de la Lutte contre les changements climatiques—MDDELCC. (2015). The Carbon Market. http://www.mddelcc.gouv.qc.ca/changements/carbone/index-en.htm.
  35. Molina-Azorín, J. F., Claver-Cortés, E., López-Gamero, M. D., & Tarí, J. J. (2009). Green management and financial performance: A literature review. Management Decision, 47(7), 1080–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mulpuru, S., Hult, P., & Johnson, C. (2008). The future of online secondary ticketing. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research Inc.Google Scholar
  37. Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action, Harvard Economic Studies, Volume CXXIV. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Pedelty, M. (2012). Ecomusicology: Rock, folk, and the environment. Philadelphia: Temple UP.Google Scholar
  39. Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 829–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Portney, P. R. (2008). The (not so) new corporate social responsibility: An empirical perspective. Review of environmental economics and policy, 2(2), 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Reinhardt, F. L., Stavins, R. N., & Vietor, R. H. (2008). Corporate social responsibility through an economic lens. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sá, N., & Turkay, E. (2013). Ticket pricing and scalping: A game theoretical approach. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 13(2), 627–653.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, K. (2007). The carbon neutral myth. Offset indulgences for your climate sins. The Netherlands: Carbon Trade Watch, Transnational Institute.Google Scholar
  44. United Nations Environment Programme. (2010). Singing to a Greener Tune. Current status of the music industry in addressing environmental sustainability. Report prepared by Meegan Jones and Xenya Scanlon, Music & Environment Initiative, UNEP. March 2010.Google Scholar
  45. Viscusi, W. K., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (2006). The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: A rational and behavioural blend. Climatic Change, 77, 151–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Waldfogel, J. (2013). Digitization, copyright, and the flow of new music products. Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, 2, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Weber, C. L., Koomey, J. G., & Matthews, H. S. (2009). The energy and climate change impacts of different music delivery methods. Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Stanford University. For Microsoft Corporation and Intel Corporation. http://download.intel.com/pressroom/pdf/CDsvsdownloadsrelease.pdf.
  48. Wittlich, C. (2012). Jack Johnson and sustainable music events. In T. Pernecky & M. Lück (Eds.), Events, society and sustainability: Critical and contemporary approaches (pp. 211–228). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie Connolly
    • 1
  • Jérôme Dupras
    • 2
  • Charles Séguin
    • 1
  1. 1.Département des sciences économiquesUniversité du Québec à MontréalMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Institut des sciences de la forêt tempéréeUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisRiponCanada

Personalised recommendations