Advertisement

Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 127–162 | Cite as

Cultural participation in Europe: Can we identify common determinants?

  • Martin Falk
  • Tally Katz-Gerro
Original Article

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which demographic and socioeconomic characteristics influence the decision to visit and the number of visits to museums, art galleries, historical monuments, and archaeological sites. Using ordered probit models based on data for 350,000 adults in 24 EU countries, we find that the likelihood and number of such visits depend mainly on per capita household income, education, labor market status, and country of birth. Attained characteristics such as education and income have remarkably similar positive effects on cultural participation across the countries in our sample, while the effects of age and gender are both weaker and less consistent across countries. We conclude that cultural distinctions along the lines of socioeconomic attainment are stable even in very different country contexts with varying cultural policies and economic conditions. We discuss the way these results inform three research topics: identification of the characteristics of visitors to museums and historical sites in order to attract new audiences; the effect of public spending on culture on accessibility to cultural sites; and cross-national variation in cultural stratification.

Keywords

Cultural participation Cross-National comparison Cultural policy Europe 

References

  1. Amemiya, T. (1981). Qualitative response models: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 19, 1483–1536.Google Scholar
  2. Ateca-Amestoy, V., & Prieto-Rodriguez, J. (2013). Forecasting accuracy of behavioural models for participation in the arts. European Journal of Operational Research, 229(1), 124–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett, T., Bustamante, M., & Frow, J. (2013). The Australian space of lifestyles in comparative perspective. Journal of Sociology, 49(2–3), 224–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bina, V., Chantepie, P., Deroin, V., Frank, G., Kommel, K., Kotynek, J., & Robin, P. (2012). ESSnet-culture final report. European Commission: Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  5. Boorsma, P. B., van Hemel, A., & van der Wielen, N. (1998). Privatization and culture. Experiences in the arts, heritage and cultural industries in Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  6. Borgonovi, F. (2004). Performing arts attendance: An economic approach. Applied Economics, 36(17), 1871–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1987). What makes a social class? On the theoretical and practical existence of groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–18.Google Scholar
  9. Christin, A. (2012). Gender and highbrow cultural participation in the United States. Poetics, 40(5), 423–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulangeon, P. (2005). Educational attainment and participation in ‘highbrow culture’. A comparative approach in the european union. Paris: Observatoire Sociologique du Changement, OSC, Sciences Po.Google Scholar
  11. Coulangeon, P. (2013). Changing policies, challenging theories and persisting inequalities: Social disparities in cultural participation in France from 1981 to 2008. Poetics, 41(2), 177–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, S. (2005). Still popular: Museums and their visitors 1994–2004. Cultural Trends, 14(1), 67–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiMaggio, P. (1996). Are art-museum visitors different from other people? The relationship between attendance and social and political attitudes in the United States. Poetics, 24(2), 161–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eurostat (2008). Detailed guidelines of EU-SILC (EU-SILC 065 Description of target variables: Cross-sectional and longitudinal). Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  15. Eurostat. (2010). EU-SILC 2006 module on social participation. Assessment of the implementation. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  16. Everett, M., & Barrett, M. S. (2009). Investigating sustained visitor/museum relationships: Employing narrative research in the field of museum visitor studies. Visitor Studies, 12(1), 2–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feder, T., Katz-Gerro T.(2015). The cultural hierarchy in funding: Government funding of the performing arts based on ethnic and geographic distinctions. Poetics. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. Feder, T., & Katz-Gerro, T. (2012). Who benefits from public funding of the performing arts? Comparing the art provision and the hegemony—distinction approaches. Poetics, 40(4), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2006). The Economics of Museums. In V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of art and culture (pp. 1017–1047). Amsterdam: North Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fullerton, D. (1991). On Justifications of public support of the arts. Journal of Cultural Economics, 15, 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerhards, J. (2008). Die Kulturell Dominierende Klasse in Europa. Eine Vergleichende Analyse der 27 Mitgliedsländer der Europäischen Union im Anschluss an Pierre Bourdieu. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 60, 723–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greene, W. H., & Hensher, D. A. (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer and recent developments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harris, M. N., & Zhao, X. (2007). A zero-inflated ordered probit model, with an application to modelling tobacco consumption. Journal of Econometrics, 141, 1073–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hillman-Chartrand, H., McCaughey, C. (1989). The arm’s length principle and the arts: An international perspective—past, present and future. In: M. Cummings, J.M.D Schuster (Eds.) Who’s to Pay for the Arts? The International Search for Models of Support. American Council for the Arts Books.Google Scholar
  25. Hooper-Greenhill, E. (1994). Museums and their Visitors. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Katz-Gerro, T. (2002). Highbrow cultural consumption and class distinction in Italy, Israel, West Germany, Sweden, and the United States. Social Forces, 81(1), 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Katz-Gerro, T. (2004). Cultural consumption research: review of methodology, theory, and consequence. International Review of Sociology, 14(1), 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katz-Gerro, T. (2011). Cross-national cultural consumption research: Inspirations and disillusions. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 51, 339–360. (in English).Google Scholar
  29. Katz-Gerro, T., & Lopez-Sintas, J. (2013). The breadth of europeans’ musical tastes: Disentangling individual and country effects. Advances in Sociology Research, 14, 97–122.Google Scholar
  30. Kawashima, N. (1995). Comparing cultural policy: Towards the development of comparative study. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 1(2), 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirchberg, V., & Kuchar, R. (2014). States of comparability: A meta-study of representative population surveys and studies on cultural consumption. Poetics,. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2014.01.005.Google Scholar
  32. Lampi, E., & Orth, M. (2009). Who visits the Museums? A comparison between stated preferences and observed effects of entrance fees. Kyklos, 62(1), 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lynch, R., Burton, C., Scott, C., Wilson, P., & Smith, P. (Eds.). (2000). Leisure and change: Implications for museums in the 21st century. Sydney: University of Technology and Powerhouse Museum.Google Scholar
  34. Masters, T., Russell, R., & Brooks, R. (2011). The demand for creative arts in regional Victoria, Australia. Applied Economics, 43(5), 619–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nichols, A., Schaffer, M. (2007). Clustered errors in stata. http://repec.org/usug2007/crse.pdf. Accessed March 2014.
  36. Pick, J., Ajala, R., & Anderton, M. H. (1988). The arts in a state: A study of government arts policies from ancient Greece to the present. Bristol: Bristol Classical Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schuster, M. J. (1991). The audience for American art museums. Washington: Seven Locks.Google Scholar
  38. Schuster, M. J. (2007). Participation studies and cross-national comparison: Proliferation, prudence, and possibility in the arts and culture. Cultural Trends, 16, 99–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Van der Ploeg, R (2005). The making of cultural policy: A european perspective. CESifo working paper series No. 1524.Google Scholar
  40. Van Hek, M., & Kraaykamp, G. (2013). Cultural consumption across countries: A multi-level analysis of social inequality in highbrow culture in europe. Poetics, 41(4), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Virtanen, T. (2007). Across and beyond the bounds of taste: On cultural consumption patterns in the european union. Turku: Turku School of Economics.Google Scholar
  42. Vogel, H. (2004). Entertainment industry economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO)ViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations