Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 225–246 | Cite as

The happy artist: an empirical application of the work-preference model

Original Article

Abstract

The artistic labor market is marked by several adversities, such as low wages, above-average unemployment, and constrained underemployment. Nevertheless, it attracts many young people. The number of students exceeds the available jobs by far. A potential explanation for this puzzle is that artistic work might result in exceptionally high job satisfaction, a conjecture that has been mentioned at various times in the literature. We conduct the first direct empirical investigation into artists’ job satisfaction. The analysis is based on panel data from the German Socio-Economic Panel Survey. Artists on average are found to be considerably more satisfied with their work than non-artists, a finding that corroborates the conjectures in the literature. Differences in income, working hours, and personality cannot account for the observed difference in job satisfaction. Partially, but not fully, the higher job satisfaction can be attributed to the higher self-employment rate among artists. Suggestive evidence is found that superior “procedural” characteristics of artistic work, such as increased variety and on-the-job learning, contribute to the difference in job satisfaction.

Keywords

Job satisfaction Artists Work-preference Cultural economics 

JEL Classification

Z10 J24 J28 J31 

References

  1. Abbing, H. (2002). Why are artists poor? The exceptional economy of the arts. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, M. (1985). Stardom and Talent. American Economic Review, 75(1), 208–212.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, M. (2006). Stardom and Talent. In Ginsburgh, V. A., & Thorsby, D., (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  4. Alper, N. O., & Wassall, G. H. (2006). Artists’ careers and their labor markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh, & D. Thorsby (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture. Amsterdam: North-HollandGoogle Scholar
  5. Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2004). Being independent raises happiness at work. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11, 95–134.Google Scholar
  6. Benz, M., & Frey, B. S. (2008). Being independent is a great thing: Subjective evaluations of self-employment and hierarchy. Economica, 75, 362–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2001). Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data. American Economic Review, 91(2), 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bille, T. (2010). Creative labour: Who are they? What do they do? Where do they work?—A quantitative study from Denmark. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, A. E. (1998). Measures of job satisfaction. What makes a good job? evidence from OECD countries. OECD Labour Market and Social Policy Occasional Papers, 34.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A. E. (2001). What really matters in a job? Hedonic measurement using quit data. Labour Economics, 8, 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, C. W. (1983). Psychology of employee lateness, absence, and turnover: A methodological critique and an empirical study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68(1), 88–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowen, T., & Tabarrok, A. (2000). An economic theory of avant-garde and popular art, or high and low culture. Southern Economic Journal, 67(2), 232–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. D’Addio, A. C., Eriksson, T., & Frijters, P. (2003). An analysis of the determinants of job satisfaction when individuals’ baseline satisfaction levels may differ. Working Paper 2003-16, Centre for Applied Microeconomics, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  14. D’Addio, A. C., Eriksson, T., & Frijters, P. (2007). An analysis of the determinants of job satisfaction when individuals’ baseline satisfaction levels may differ. Applied Economics, 39, 2413–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Tella, R., & MacCulloch, R. (2006). Some uses of happiness data in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Erhardt, J., Saris, W., & Venhofen, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(2), 177–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eurostat (2011). Cultural statistics.Eurostat Pocketbooks. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  18. Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happinessThe Economic Journal, 114, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frank, R., & Cook, P. (1995). The winner-take-all society. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  20. Frank, R. H. (2005). Does absolute income matter?. In L. Bruni, & P. L. Porta (Eds.), Economics and happiness: Framing the analysis (pp. 65–90). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey, B. S. (2003). Arts & economics: Analysis & cultural policy. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Frey, B. S. (2008). Happiness: A revolution in economics. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Frey, B. S., & Pommerehne, W. W. (1989). Muses and markets: Explorations in the economics of the arts. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  24. Green, F. (2007). Demanding work: The paradox of job quality in the affluent economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haak, C. (2005). Künstler zwischen selbständiger und abhängiger Erwerbsarbeit. Discussion Paper 2005-107, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).Google Scholar
  26. Hamermesh, D. S. (2001). The changing distribution of job satisfaction. Journal of Human Resources, 36(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. IAB. (2011). Berufe im Spiegel der Statisik. http://bisds.infosys.iab.de/.
  28. Karttunen, S. (1998). How to identify artists? Defining the population for ‘status-of-the-artist’ studies. Poetics, 26, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Katz, E., & Syrquin, M. (1982). The failure of psychic income as a source of market failure. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 4(4), 623–627.Google Scholar
  30. Kristensen, N., & Johansson, E. (2008). New evidence on cross-country differences in job satisfaction using anchoring vignettes. Labour Economics, 15, 96–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Layard, R. (2006). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  32. Menger, P.-M. (1999). Artistic labor markets and careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 541–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Menger, P.-M. (2001). Artists as workers: Theoretical and methodological challenges. Poetics, 28, 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Menger, P.-M. (2006). Artistic labor markets: Contingent work, excess supply and occupational risk management. In V. A. Ginsburgh, & D. Thorsby, (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of arts and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  35. Pugno, M. (2004). Rationality and affective motivation: New ideas from neurobiology and psychiatry for economic theory? Discussion Paper 0501, Department of Economics, University of Trento.Google Scholar
  36. Rengers, M. (2002). Economic lives of artists: Studies into careers and the labour market in the cultural sector. Doctoral Thesis. Utrecht University.Google Scholar
  37. Robinson, M. D., & Montgomery, S. S. (2000). The time allocation and earnings of artists. Industrial Relations, 39(3), 525–534.Google Scholar
  38. Rose, M. (2007). Why so fed up and footloose in IT? Spelling out the associations between occupation and overall job satisfaction shown by WERS 2004. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(4), 356–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71(5), 845–858.Google Scholar
  40. Sandvik, E., Diener, E., and Seidlitz, L. (1993). Subjective well-being: The convergence and stability of self-report and non-self-report measures. Journal of Personality, 61(3), 317–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santos, F. (1976). Risk, uncertainty and the performing artist. In M. Blaug (Ed.), The economics of the arts. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  42. Söndermann, M. (2004). Kulturberufe—Statistisches Kurzportrait zu den erwerbstätigen Künstlern, Publizisten, Designern, Architekten und verwandten Berufen im Kulturberufemarkt in Deutschland 1995–2003. Arbeitskreis Kulturstatistik (ARKStat) im Haus der Kultur, Bonn.Google Scholar
  43. Throsby, D. (1994). A work-preference model of artist behaviour. In A. Peacock, & I. Rizzo (Eds.), Cultural economics and cultural policies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  44. Throsby, D. (2001). Defining the artistic workforce: The Australian experience. Poetics, 28, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Throsby, D., & Hollister, V. (2003). Don’t give up your day job: An economic study of professional artists in Australia. Australia Council.Google Scholar
  46. Thurow, L. C. (1978). Psychic income: Useful or useless? American Economic Review, 68(2), 142–148.Google Scholar
  47. Thurow, L. C. (1980). Psychic income: A market failure. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 68(2), 142–148.Google Scholar
  48. Towse, R. (1992). The earnings of singers: An economic analysis. In R.Towse & A. Kahkee (Eds.), Cultural Economics. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Towse, R. (2006). Human capital and artists’ labour markets. In V. A. Ginsburgh, & D. Thorsby (Eds.),Handbook of the economics of arts and culture. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  50. UNESCO. (1980). Records of the general conference, twenty-first session, Belgrade 1980. Volume 1: Resolutions. Imprimerie des Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  51. van Praag, B. M. (1991). Ordinal and cardinal utility: An integration of the two dimensions of the welfare concept. Journal of Econometrics, 50(1–2), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagner, G. G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP)-Scope, Evolution and Enhancements. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 127(1), 139–169.Google Scholar
  53. Warr, P. (1999). Well-being and the workplace. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  54. Withers, G. (1985). Artists’ subsidy of the arts. Australian Economic Papers, 24, 290–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations