Skip to main content

Do Income Supplemental Programs for Older Adults’ Help Reduce Primary Caregiver Burden? Evidence from Mexico

Abstract

In countries such as Mexico without formal public long-term care policies, informal care becomes the main source of support for older adults. Alternative social programs, such as supplemental income programs, for older adults could alleviate caregiver burden, especially if supplemental income were to be used for paid care or to compensate non-paid family caregivers. This work is the first to analyze the effects of a supplemental income program for older adults on primary caregiver burden. To identify how such a program might affect caregiver burden, we analyze rich panel data on 433 adults 70 years and older in two communities, one receiving a supplemental income program and the other not, in Yucatan, Mexico. Data were collected in 2008 and 2009 among treatment and control groups before and 6 months after program introduction. We employ a difference-in-differences approach. In our sample, most care is provided by non-paid female caregivers. We find that individuals in both the treatment and control groups received fewer hours of care over time. The decrease was lower for older adults who received the supplemental income, but the difference with those who did not was not statistically significant. We also observe few changes on caregiving burden; even after program introduction, more than 98% of caregivers remained unpaid and the same primary caregiver remained. Altogether, our work suggests supplemental income programs have negligible effects on caregiving, making evident the urgent need for other strategies to support non-paid caregivers who bear most of the burden for old-age care in Mexico.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Aguila, E., Diaz, C., Fu, M. M., Kapteyn, A., & Pierson, A. (2011). Living longer in Mexico: Income security and health : executive summary. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG1179z1.html.

  2. Aguila, E., Kapteyn, A., Robles, R., Vargas, O., & Weidmer, B. A. (2014). A noncontributory pension program for older persons in Yucatan, Mexico [Product Page]. Retrieved June 6, 2016, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1288z1.html.

  3. Aguila, E., Cervera, M. D., Martinez, H., & Weidmer, B. A. (2015a). Developing and testing informed-consent methods in a study of the elderly in Mexico [Product Page]. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR1288z8.html.

  4. Aguila, E., Kapteyn, A., & Smith, J. P. (2015b). Effects of income supplementation on health of the poor elderly: The case of Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414453112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aguila, E., Mejia, N., Perez-Arce, F., Ramírez, E., & Rivera Illingworth, A. (2016). Costs of extending the noncontributory pension program for elderly: The Mexican case. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 28(4), 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959420.2016.1158384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aguila, E., Kapteyn, A., & Perez-Arce, F. (2017). Consumption smoothing and frequency of benefit payments of cash transfer programs. American Economic Review, 107(5), 430–435. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aguila, E., López-Ortega, M., & Gutierrez-Robledo, L. M. (2018). Non-contributory pension programs and frailty of older adults: Evidence from Mexico. Mimeo. University of Southern California. (Mimeo).

  8. Amuedo-Dorantes, C., & Juarez, L. (2015). Old-age government transfers and the crowding out of private gifts: the 70 and above program for the rural elderly in Mexico. Southern Economic Journal, 81(3), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.4284/0038-4038-2013.055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Angel, J. L., Vega, W., & López-Ortega, M. (2016). Aging in Mexico: Population trends and emerging issues. The Gerontologist, gnw136. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw136.

  10. Angst, S., Aguila, E., & López-Ortega, M. (2019). Determinants of informal care supply for older adults in Yucatan, Mexico. In W. A. Vega, J. L. Angel, L. M. F. Gutiérrez Robledo, & K. S. Markides (Eds.), Contextualizing health and aging in the Americas (pp. 337–358). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00584-9_16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Bergstrom, C. A., & Heymann, S. J. (2005). Impact of gender disparities in family carework on women’s life chances in Chiapas. Mexico, 36.

  12. Bitran, R., & Giedion, U. (2003). Waivers and exemptions for health services in developing countries (No. 33359; pp. 1–2). Retrieved from The World Bank website: http://documentos.bancomundial.org/curated/es/2003/01/6246381/waivers-exemptions-health-services-developing-countries.

  13. Bocquaire, E. (2016). Long-term care coverage in Europe. Long-Term Care News, 41 (5), 11-14. Society of Actuaries. https://www.soa.org/globalassets/assets/Library/Newsletters/Long-Term-Care/2016/may/ltc-2016-iss-41.pdf

  14. Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Retrieved from http://www.books24x7.com/marc.asp?bookid=12069.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Chari, A. V., Engberg, J., Ray, K. N., & Mehrotra, A. (2015). The opportunity costs of informal elder-care in the United States: new estimates from the American time use survey. Health Services Research, 50(3), 871–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuang, J. C.-C. (2012). Do social allowance transfers crowd out private transfers? An analysis of responses among elderly households in Taiwan. International Journal of Social Welfare, 21(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00788.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coady, D., Grosh, M. E., & Hoddinott, J. (2004). Targeting of transfers in developing countries: Review of lessons and experience. (No. 30230; pp. 1–320). The World Bank. Retrieved from The World Bank website: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/464231468779449856/Targeting-of-transfers-in-developing-countries-rview-of-lessons-and-experience.

  18. Colombo, F., Llena-Nozal, A., Mercier, J., & Tjadens, F. (2011). Help wanted?: Providing and paying for Long-Term Care. (OECD Health Policy Studies, OECD Publishing). Paris: OEDCD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264097759-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Comisión Económica para América Latina (CEPAL). (2018). Base de datos de programas de protección social no contributiva en América Latina y el Caribe. Retrieved October 14, 2018 from https://dds.cepal.org/bpsnc/ptc.

  20. e Iria Vázquez, P. M. (2015). Cuidar cuesta: Un análisis del cuidado desde la perspectiva de género [Text]. https://doi.org/10.5477/cis/reis.151.83.

  21. Feinberg, L. F., & Newman, S. L. (2004). A study of 10 states since passage of the National Family Caregiver Support Program: policies, perceptions, and program development. The Gerontologist, 44(6), 760–769. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.6.760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ferrucci, L., Guralnik, J. M., Cecchi, F., Marchionni, N., Salani, B., Kasper, J., Celli, R., Giardini, S., Heikkinen, E., Jylha, M., & Baroni, A. (1998). Constant hierarchic patterns of physical functioning across seven populations in five countries. The Gerontologist, 38(3), 286–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/38.3.286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Folbre, N. (Ed.). (2012). For love and money: Care provision in the United States. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Bando, R. (2016). Non-contributory pensions. Labour Economics, 38, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2015.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. García-Calvente, M. d. M., Mateo-Rodríguez, I., & Maroto-Navarro, G. (2004). El impacto de cuidar en la salud y la calidad de vida de las mujeres. Gaceta Sanitaria, 18(5), 83–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Giraldo-Rodríguez, L., Guevara-Jaramillo, N., Agudelo-Botero, M., Mino-León, D., & López-Ortega, M. (2018). Qualitative exploration of the experiences of informal care-givers for dependent older adults in Mexico City. Ageing & Society, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X18000478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gomes Da Conceicao, C., & Montes de Oca, V. (2013). Ageing in Mexico: Families, informal care and reciprocity. In Living longer: ageing, development and social protection. Retrieved from https://nls.ldls.org.uk/welcome.html?ark:/81055/vdc_100044862319.0x000001.

  28. Grunfeld, E., Coyle, D., Whelan, T., Clinch, J., Reyno, L., Earle, C. C., et al. (2004). Family caregiver burden: Results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal = Journal de l’Association Medicale Canadienne, 170(12), 1795–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gutiérrez Robledo, L. M., López-Ortega, M., & Arango Lopera, V. E. (2012). The State of Elder Care in Mexico. Current Translational Geriatrics and Experimental Gerontology Reports, 1(4), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-012-0028-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Guzmán, J. M., & Huenchuan, S. (2005). Políticas hacia las familias con adultos mayores: el desafío del derecho al cuidado en la edad avanzada. Reunión de Expertos. Santiago de Chile: CELADE-CEPAL.

  31. Heger, D. (2014). Work and Well-Being of Informal Caregivers in Europe (No. 512). Retrieved from RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen website: https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/rwirep/512.html.

  32. Hellström, Y., & Hallberg, I. R. (2004). Determinants and characteristics of help provision for elderly people living at home and in relation to quality of life. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 18(4), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2004.00291.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. HelpAge International, University of Manchester, & Institute for Development Policy and Management. (2003). Non-contributory pensions and poverty prevention: a comparative study of Brazil and South Africa. Manchester, UK; London, UK: Institute of Development and Policy Management; HelpAge International. Retrieved from https://www.helpage.org/silo/files/noncontributory-pensions-and-poverty-prevention-a-comparative-study-of-brazil-and-southafrica-.pdf

  34. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Huenchuan, S., & Rodríguez Velázquez, R. I. (2015). Necesidades de cuidado de las personas mayores en la Ciudad de México: diagnóstico y lineamientos de política. Retrieved September 14, 2018, from https://repositorio.cepal.org//handle/11362/38879.

  36. Jagger, C., Arthur, A. J., Spiers, N. A., & Clarke, M. (2001). Patterns of onset of disability in activities of daily living with age. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49(4), 404–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jensen, R. T. (2004). Do private transfers ‘displace’ the benefits of public transfers? Evidence from South Africa. Journal of Public Economics, 88(1–2), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00085-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson, R. J., & Wolinsky, F. D. (1993). The structure of health status among older adults: disease, disability, functional limitation, and perceived health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 34(2), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Juarez, L. (2009). Crowding out of private support to the elderly: Evidence from a demogrant in Mexico. Journal of Public Economics, 93(3–4), 454–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Juarez, L., & Pfutze, T. (2015). The effects of a noncontributory pension program on labor force participation: the case of 70 y Más in Mexico. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 63(4), 685–713. https://doi.org/10.1086/681668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Katz, S. (1983). Assessing self-maintenance: activities of daily living, mobility, and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 31(12), 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kim, E. H.-W. (2012). Public support, family support, and life satisfaction of the elderly: Evidence from a new government old-age pension in Korea. Retrieved August 18, 2018 from https://dukespace.lib.duke.edu/dspace/bitstream/handle/10161/5571/Kim_duke_0066D_11385.pdf?sequence=1.

  43. La Parra, D. (2001). Contribución de las mujeres y los hogares más pobres a la producción de cuidados de salud informales. Gaceta Sanitaria, 15(6), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0213-9111(01)71612-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lawton, M. P., & Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9(3 Part 1), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/9.3_Part_1.179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ley de los Derechos de las Personas Adultas Mayores 2001. (2015). Diario Oficial de la Federación del 25 junio 2002. 29.

  46. Ley General para la Inclusión de las Personas con Discapacidad. (2011). Diario Oficial de la Federación del 30 de mayo de 2011. Última reforma publicada DOF 17-12-2015. 29.

  47. Lloyd-Sherlock, P., & Agrawal, S. (2014). Pensions and the health of older people in South Africa: is there an effect? The Journal of Development Studies, 50(11), 1570–1586. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2014.936399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. López-Ortega, M. (2014). The family household and informal old age care in Mexico: a research note. International Journal of Sociology of the Family, 40(2).

  49. López-Ortega, M., & Gutiérrez Robledo, L. M. (Eds.). (2015). Percepciones y valores en torno a los cuidados de las personas adultas mayores. In Luis Miguel Gutiérrez Robledo and Liliana Giraldo (coord.) Realidades y expectativas frente a la nueva vejez: Encuesta Nacional de Envejecimiento (Primera edición, pp. 113–133). México, D.F: Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.

  50. Martínez, R., & Coperation, G. A. for I (2018). Institutional frameworks for social policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved October 18, 2018 from https://repositorio.cepal.org//handle/11362/44170.

  51. Mayston, R., Lloyd-Sherlock, P., Gallardo, S., Wang, H., Huang, Y., Montes de Oca, V., Ezeah, P., Guerra, M., Sosa, A. L., Liu, Z., Uwakwe, R., Guerchet, M. M., & Prince, M. (2017). A journey without maps-understanding the costs of caring for dependent older people in Nigeria, China, Mexico and Peru. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182360. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring Health: A guide to rating scales and questionnaires. 3rd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

  53. Mendez-Luck, C. A., Kennedy, D. P., & Wallace, S. P. (2008). Concepts of burden in giving care to older relatives: a study of female caregivers in a Mexico City neighborhood. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 23(3), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-008-9058-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mendez-Luck, C. A., Kennedy, D. P., & Wallace, S. P. (2009). Guardians of health: the dimensions of elder caregiving among women in a Mexico City neighborhood. Social Science & Medicine, 68(2), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.10.026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. National Academies of Sciences, E., and Medicine. (2016). Families caring for an aging America. Washington, DC: U.S.: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Oliveri, M. L., & InterAmerican Development Bank. (2016). Pensiones sociales y pobreza en América Latina. Apuntes: Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 43(78), 121–157. https://doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.78.848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Pelcastre-Villafuerte, B. E., Treviño-Siller, S., González-Vázquez, T., & Márquez-Serrano, M. (2011). Social support and living conditions in poor elderly people in urban Mexico. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 27(3), 460–470. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2011000300007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pestieau, P., Ali, R., & Dethier, J.-J. (2010). Universal minimum old age pensions: impact on poverty and fiscal cost in 18 Latin American countries (No. WPS5292; pp. 1–46). Retrieved August 18, 2018 from The World Bank website: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/397501468299147949/Universal-minimum-old-age-pensions-impact-on-poverty-and-fiscal-cost-in-18-Latin-American-countries.

  59. Queisser, M., & Organisation de coopération et de développement économiques, & Centre de développement. (1998). La réforme des systèmes de retraite en Amérique latine. Retrieved from http://new.sourceocde.org/9264163611.

  60. Robles, L. S. (2001). El fenómeno de las cuidadoras: un efecto invisible del envejecimiento. Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos, 16(3 (48)), 561–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Robles, L. S. (2005). La relación cuidado y envejecimiento: entre la sobrevivencia y la devaluación social. Papeles de Población, 11(45), 49–69.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rofman, R., Apella, I., & Vezza, E. (2013). Más allá de las pensiones contributivas: catorce experiencias en America Latina (No. 82724; pp. 1-500). The World Bank. Retrieved from The World Bank website: http://documentos.bancomundial.org/curated/es/624841468047055585/Mas-alla-de-las-pensionescontributivas-catorce-experiencias-en-America-Latina

  63. Ruiz, B., & Teresa, M. (2015). El Coste de Cuidar desde una Perspectiva de Género: Proceso Emocional de Personas Cuidadoras de Familiares Dependientes. Retrieved September 18, 2018, from https://idus.us.es/xmlui/handle/11441/30858.

  64. Salinas-Rodríguez, A., Manrique-Espinoza, B., Moreno-Tamayo, K., Torres-Pereda, P., De la Cruz-Góngora, V., Ángeles-Tagliaferro, G., & Téllez-Rojo Solís, M. M. (2014). Impact Evaluation of the Non-Contributory Social Pension Program 70 y más in Mexico, 3ie Impact Evaluation Report 5. Retrieved October 1, 2018 from International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) website: http://www.3ieimpact.org/media/filer_public/2014/04/07/ie_5-mexico_social_pension_0304_top_3.pdf.

  65. Schwarzer, H., & Querino, A. C. (2002). Non-contributory pensions in Brazil: The impact on poverty reduction. Retrieved September 18, 2018 from http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=359468.

  66. Sheehan, C. M., & Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2017). Gendered expectations distort male-female differences in instrumental activities of daily living in later adulthood. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 74, 715–723. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbw209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Spector, W. D., Katz, S., Murphy, J. B., & Fulton, J. P. (1987). The hierarchical relationship between activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(6), 481–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(87)90004-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. StataCorp. (2013). Stata statistical software: Release 13. College Station: StataCorp LP.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Téllez, Muradás M dela C, & Aguilar, L. (2017). Características sociodemográficas del envejecimiento de la población mexicana a través de un enfoque prospectivo. In Vejez y pensiones en México (Asociación Mexicana de Administradoras de Fondos para el Retiro, ac Secretaría de Gobernación/Secretaría General del Consejo Nacional de Población, pp. 45–76).

  70. Tennstedt, S. L., Crawford, S. L., & McKinlay, J. B. (1993). Is family care on the decline? A longitudinal investigation of the substitution of formal long-term care services for informal care. The Milbank Quarterly, 71(4), 601–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. The American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). (2016). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (9th edition). AAPOR. Retrieved from https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf.

  72. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, & Population Division. (2015). World Population Ageing 2015 (No. ST/ESA/SER.A/390). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WPA2015_Report.pdf.

  73. Van Houtven, C. H., & Norton, E. C. (2004). Informal care and health care use of older adults. Journal of Health Economics, 23(6), 1159–1180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Varley, A., & Blasco, M. (2000). Intact or in tatters? Family care of older women and men in urban Mexico. Gender and Development, 8(2), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/741923623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Verbrugge, L. M., & Jette, A. M. (1994). The disablement process. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 38(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Verbrugge, L. M., Yang, L.-S., & Juarez, L. (2004). Severity, timing, and structure of disability. Sozial- Und Praventivmedizin, 49(2), 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wolff, J. L., Spillman, B. C., Freedman, V. A., & Kasper, J. D. (2016). A national profile of family and unpaid caregivers who assist older adults with health care activities. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(3), 372–379. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.7664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Wong, R., Michaels-Obregon, A., & Palloni, A. (2015). Cohort profile: the Mexican health and aging study (MHAS). International Journal of Epidemiology, 46, e2. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyu263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Wunderlich, G. S., Rice, D. P., & Amado, N. L., & Research, I. of M. (US) and N. R. C. (US) C. to R. the S. S. A. D. D. P (2002). A work disability monitoring system. Retrieved October 2, 2018 from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220733/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the staff in Yucatan—supervisors, directors, coordinators, interviewers, programmers, and administrators—who made the project possible. We also thank Jorge Peniche for his excellent research assistance.

Funding

This research was supported by funding from the State of Yucatan and by Grants R01AG035008, P01AG022481, and R21AG033312 from the National Institute on Aging and the RAND Center for the Study of Aging (P30AG012815 from NIA).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma Aguila.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguila, E., López-Ortega, M. & Angst, S. Do Income Supplemental Programs for Older Adults’ Help Reduce Primary Caregiver Burden? Evidence from Mexico. J Cross Cult Gerontol 34, 385–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-019-09374-8

Download citation

Keywords

  • Caregiver burden
  • Supplemental income programs
  • Poverty
  • Older adults
  • Mexico