Advertisement

Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 407–420 | Cite as

Older Persons’ use of the European Court of Human Rights

  • Benny Spanier
  • Israel DoronEmail author
  • Faina Milman-Sivan
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

One of the most significant human rights tribunals in Europe is the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR). Up to day, no study has attempted to explore the cases brought before the ECtHR that discuss and rule on issues concerning the rights of older persons. To descriptively analyze the ECtHR cases that deal with older persons and elder rights issues. Quantitative and descriptive analysis of 226 randomly selected publicly-open ECtHR cases dealing with elder-rights between the years 2000–2010. On average, 11.9 % of the ECtHR case load included rulings that concern older persons’ rights. In the majority of the cases (91 %, 205 judgments), the ECtHR found a violation of at least one human right concerning older persons. Despite the fact that rights of older persons do not appear as such in the European Convention on Human Rights, older persons do find their way to the ECtHR.

Keywords

Human rights European court of human rights Elder law Elder rights Jurisprudential gerontology 

References

  1. Buergenthal, T. (2006). The evolving International Human Rights System. American Journal of International Law, 100, 783–807.Google Scholar
  2. Defeis, E. F. (2000). Human rights and the European Union: who decides? Possible conflicts between the European Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights. Dick. Journal of International Law, 19, 301–359.Google Scholar
  3. Doron, I. (2005). From National to International Elder Law. International Journal on Ageing, Law and Policy, 1, 45–72.Google Scholar
  4. Doron, I. (2007). Demographic, social change and equality. In H. Meenan (Ed.), Equality Law in an enlarged European Union: Understanding the article 13 directives (pp. 117–141). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doron, I. (Ed.). (2008). Theories on law and ageing. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Doron, I. (2013). Older Europeans and the European Court of Justice. Age & Ageing, 42, 604–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doron, I., & Apter, I. (2010). The debate around the need for an International Convention on the rights of older persons. The Gerontologist, 50(5), 586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Doron, I., & Meenan, H. (2012). Time for geriatric jurisprudence. Gerontology, 58(3), 193–196.Google Scholar
  9. Doron, I., & Spanier, B. (2012). International Elder Law: the future of Elder Law. In I. Doron & A. M. Soden (Eds.), Beyond Elder Law: New directions in law and aging (pp. 125–148). NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Egli, P. (2008). Protocol No. 14 to the European Convention for Protection of Human Right and Fundamental Freedoms: towards a more effective control mechanism? Journal of Transnational Law & Policy, 17, 1–34.Google Scholar
  11. Eurobarometer. (2012). Active ageing — report. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  12. European Convention on Human Rights. (2010). Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (As amended by the provisions of Protocol No. 14 (CETS no. 194) as from its entry into force on 1 June 2010).Google Scholar
  13. European Court of Human Rights. (1998). Bronda v. Italy, (1998) Application no. 40/1997. pp. 51.Google Scholar
  14. European Court of Human Rights. (2006). Romaniak v. Poland, (2006) ECtHR Application no. 53284/99, pp. 54.Google Scholar
  15. European Court of Human Rights. (2007). Ramsahai and others v. The Netherlands, (2007) ECtHR Application no. 52391/99.pp. 14–25.Google Scholar
  16. European Court of Human Rights. (2008). Gandaloyeva v. Russia, (2008) ECtHR Application no. 14800/04, 6–14.Google Scholar
  17. European Court of Human Rights. (2009). Otto v. Austria, (2009) ECtHR Application no. 12702/08. pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
  18. European Court of Human Rights. (2010). Carson and Others v. The United Kingdom, (2010) ECtHR Application no. 42184/05. pp. 19–23.Google Scholar
  19. Evrard, A., & Lacour, C. (2012). A European approach to developing the field of law and ageing. In I. Doron & A. M. Soden (Eds.), Beyond Elder Law: New directions in law and aging (pp. 149–174). NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Facts and Figures. (2011). www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/EN/Header/Reports+and+Statistics, pp. 14–15 (Last visited Jan 2013).
  21. Follow – up to the Second World Assembly on Ageing: Comprehensive Overview, Report to the Secretary – General. U.N. Doc. A/65/157 (21 July 2010).Google Scholar
  22. Frederic, E. (2007). The length of civil and criminal proceedings in the Case-Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Gomien, D., Harris, D., & Zwaak, L. (1996). Law and practice of the European Convention on Human Rights and the European social charter. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, M., Hurwitz, W. N., & Madow, W. G. (1960). Sample survey methods and theory. NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, D. J., O’Boyle, M., Bates, E. P., & Buckley, C. M. (2009). Harris, O’Boyle & Warbric Law of the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Herring, J. (2009). Older people in law and society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hioureas, C. G. (2006). Behind the scenes of protocol no. 14: politics in reforming the European Court of Human Rights. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 24, 718–759.Google Scholar
  28. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. G.A. res. 2200A (XXI), 21 U.N. GAOR Supp. (No. 16) at 49, U.N. Doc. A/6316 (1966), 993 U.N.T.S. 3, (Entered into force Jan. 3, 1976).Google Scholar
  29. Kapp, B. M. (2003). The law and older persons: Is geriatric jurisprudence therapeutic? Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kinsella, K. (2009). Global Perspectives on the Demography of Aging. In J. Sokolovsky (Ed.), The cultural context of aging: Worldwide perspectives (pp. 13–29). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  31. Koch, I. E. (2009). Human rights indivisible rights: the protection of socio-economic demands under the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Lock, T. (2009). The ECJ and the ECHR: the future relationship between the two European courts. The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 8, 375–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahoney, P. (2005). Parting thoughts of outgoing registrar of European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Journal, 26, 345–348.Google Scholar
  34. Merrills, J. G., & Robertson, A. H. (2001). Human Rights in Europe: A study of the European Convention on Human Rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  35. O’Boyle, M., & Darcy, J. (2009). The European Court of Human Rights: accomplishments, predicaments and challenges. German Yearbook of International Law, 52, 139–198.Google Scholar
  36. Orr, L. L. (1999). Social experiments: Evaluating public programs with experimental methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Ovey, C., & White, R. C. A. (2002). Jaccobs & White, the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rodriguez-Pinzon, D., & Martin, C. (2003). The International Human Rights Status of elderly persons. American University International Law Review, 18, 915–1008.Google Scholar
  39. Rules of Court. (April 2011). Registry of the court: www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/EN/Header/Basic+Texts/Other+texts/Rules+of+Court. Rule 36 (Last visited Jan 2013).
  40. Schroods, J. J. F., Fernandez-Ballesteros, R., & Rudinger, G. (Eds.). (1999). Aging in Europe. Amsterdam: Ios Press.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, A. E. (2009). Ageing in urban neighborhoods: Place attachments and social exclusion. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  42. Spanier, B. (2013). Ageism, Soft Law and the Rights of Older Persons in the European Court of Human Rights. Haifa: Haifa University. (A thesis submitted for the degree Ph.D.).Google Scholar
  43. Tang, K. (2008). Taking older people’s rights seriously: the role of international law. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 20(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vincent, A. J. (1999). Politics, power and old age. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benny Spanier
    • 1
  • Israel Doron
    • 2
    Email author
  • Faina Milman-Sivan
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of LawUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Department of GerontologyUniversity of HaifaHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations