Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Age Discrimination Legislation in the U.K.: A Comparative and Gerontological Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The three fold purpose of this study is to (1) review the incipient age discrimination legislation in the U.K., (2) offer comparisons with the U.S., Australia, and Canada and (3) examine the new legislation in relation to relevant gerontological theory and research. Reviewed are Britain’s Employment Equality Age Regulations, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of the U.S., the Age Discrimination Act of 2004 in Australia, and Canadian Human Rights Act of 1985. A comparison of the new legislation on age discrimination in the U.K. with existing legislation of this type in the U.S., Canada, and Australia reveals that the British law appears to be weaker on many facets relative to those in the other countries. By permitting more exceptions to the law than are allowed under other types of civil rights statutes, restricting applicability of the law to the workplace, and maintaining compulsory retirement, the power of the law may be circumscribed. Gerontological theory and research do not, by and large, support these choices comprising the new British law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • A.A.R.P. (American Association of Retired Persons). (2004). Age discrimination at work. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from http://www.aarp.org/money/careers/jobloss/Articles/a2004-04-28-agediscrimination.html.

  • Adams, T., & Manthorpe, J. (2003). Age and opportunity? Nursing Older People, 15(9), 32–33, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alliance for Aging Research. (2003). Ageism: How healthcare fails the elderly. Retrieved December 21, 2005, from http://www.agingresearch.org/brochures/ageism/ageism_booklet_final.pdf.

  • Bennington, L., & Wein, R. (2000). Anti-discrimination legislation in Australia: Fair, effective, efficient or irrelevant? International Journal of Manpower, 21(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Human Rights Commission (Canada). (2003). A guide to the Canadian Human Rights Act. Retrieved December 18, 2005, from http://www.chrc-ccdp.ca.

  • Civilrights.org. (2004). Why do older workers have fewer protections against age discrimination? Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.civilrights.org.

  • Cohen, S. (2001). The complex nature of ageism: What is it? Who does it? Who perceives it? The Gerontologist, 41(5), 576–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, E. (2005). Latent age discrimination in mental health care. Mental Health Practice, 8(6), 42–45, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, S. (2005). Ageism ‘bigger problem than racism or sexism’. The Independent, 7 September.

  • Department of Health (United Kingdom). (2001). National service framework for older people: Short summary. Retrieved January 8, 2004, from http://www.doh.gov/uk/nsf/olderpeople/olderpeopleshortsummary.htm.

  • Department of Trade and Industry (2005a). Equality and diversity: Coming of age (consultation on the draft Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006). Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.dti.gov.uk/er.

  • Department of Trade and Industry (2005b). Partial regulatory impact assessment (age discrimination). Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.dti.gov.uk/er.

  • Dobson, R. (2005). Age discrimination denies elderly people a “dignified death”. British Journal of Medicine, 330(7503), 1288, 4 June.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drabsch, T. (2004). Ageing in Australia. Briefing Paper No 12/04, NSW Parliamentary Library. Retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/publications.nsf.

  • Duncan, C., & Loretto, W. (2004). Never the right age? Gender and age-based discrimination in employment. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(1), 95–115, January.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encel, S. (1999). Age discrimination in employment in Australia. Ageing International, 25(2), 69–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Encel, S. (2001). Age discrimination in Australia: Law and practice. In Z. Hornstein (Ed.), Outlawing age discrimination (pp. 17–30). Bristol, UK: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Encel, S. (2004). Age discrimination in law and in practice. Elder Law Review, 3. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://www.usw.edu/au/about/acadorg/clb/sl/research/elderlaw/elderlawreview/volume 3.

  • Federal Discrimination Law 2005. Retrieved October 8, 2007, from http://humanrights.gov.au/legal/FDL/fed_discrimination_law_05/PDF/fdl-01.pdf.

  • Frolik, L. A., & Barnes, A. M. (2007). Elder law: Cases and materials (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: Lexis Nexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne v. Northwestern Ins. Co., 881 F.2d 309, 314 (1989).

  • Gallo, W. T., Bradley, E. H., Siegel, M., & Kasl, S. (2000). Health effects of involuntary job loss among older workers: Findings from the health and retirement survey. Journal of Gerontology, 55B(3), S131–S140.

    Google Scholar 

  • General Dynamics Land Systems v. Cline 540 U.S. 581 (2004).

  • Greater Vancouver Regional District Employees’ Union v. Greater Vancouver Regional District BCJ No 2026 BCCA 435 (2001).

  • Gunderson, M. (2001). Age discrimination legislation in Canada. In Z. Hornstein (Ed.), Outlawing age discrimination (pp. 31–42). Bristol, UK: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton v. Caterpillar Inc. 966 F.2d 1226, 1228 (7th Cir. 1992).

  • Hazen Paper vs. Biggins 507 U.S. 604 113 S. Ct. 1701 (1993).

  • Hornstein, Z. (2001). Outlawing age discrimination. Bristol, UK: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Australia). (2004). All about age discrimination. Retrieved December 17, 2005, from http://www.hreoc.gov.au/age/.

  • Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Australia). (2006). Commission’s Annual Report for 2005–2006 (chapter 4). Retrieved October 12, 2007, from http://www.hreoc.gov.au.

  • International Longevity Center (Anti-Ageism Taskforce). (2006). Ageism in America. Retrieved October 8, 2007, from http://www.ilcusa.org.

  • Johnson v. Minnesota Historical Soc’y, 931 F.2d 1239, 1243, 8th Cir. (1991).

  • Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents 528 U.S. 62 (2000).

  • Kinsella, K., & Phillips, D. R. (2005). Global aging: The challenge of success. Population Bulletin, 60, 1, March. Retrieved August 1, 2005, from http://www.prb.org/pdf05/60.1GlobalAgingpdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, C. (2005). Threshold eased for age-bias lawsuits. Washington Post. 3/31, AO1.

  • Levenson, R. (2003). Institutional ageism. Community Care(1481), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, L. (2003). Age discrimination law—The slow drag to 2006. Retrieved October 20, 2004, from http://www.aarp.org/international/Articles/a2004–05–03-ia-perspectives.htm.

  • Miller, J., Birnie, S., Dutton, K., & Elliott, P. (2004). Implementing the single assessment process using the Minimum Data Set—Home Care: A pilot study. Nursing Older People, 16(9), 14–18, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, S. K., Bell, S. L., Vijayakumar, N., & Warwick, G. (2003). Ageism in renal replacement therapy. Nursing Older People, 15(9), 14–16, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. D. (2005). Ageism: Prejudice against our feared future self. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neumark, D. (2001). Age discrimination legislation in the U.S.: Assessment of the evidence. In Z. Hornstein (Ed.), Outlawing age discrimination (pp. 43–62). Bristol, UK: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, A. E. (2005). “At this point now”: Older worker reflections on their current employment experience. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 61(3), 211–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Economics Department). (2004). The labor force participation of older workers. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/4/31743847.pdf.

  • Ontario Human Rights Commission. (2007). Annual report, 2006–2007. Retrieved October 12, 2007, from http://www.ohrc.on.ca/en/resources/annualreports.

  • Palmore, E. B. (2004). Research note: Ageism in Canada and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 19, 41–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, W. (2004). Multi-disciplinary person-centred care: Has government policy helped or hindered? Nursing Older People, 16(7), 14–17, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R. A. (1995). Aging and old age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Employee Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts 109 S. Ct. 256 (1989).

  • Pulse (2003). GPs hailed for their care of the elderly. Pulse, 63(13), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Productivity Commission (Australia). (2005). Economic implications of an ageing Australia. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://www.pc.gov/au/study/ageing/finalreport/ageing1.pdf.

  • Ranzijn, R., Carson, E., Winefield, A.H., & Price, D. (2006). On the scrap-heap at 45: The human impact of mature aged unemployment. Journal of Occupational and Organization Psychology, 79, 467–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. 530 U.S. 133 (2000).

  • Roberts, Y. (2003). Latest big idea will sustain inequality. Community Care(1493), 23.

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging: The Macarthur Foundation study. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton v. The Boeing Company, 399 F.3d 909, 8th Cir. (2005).

  • Smith v. City of Jackson 125 S. Ct. 1536 (2005).

  • Special Committee on Aging (U.S.). (2000). U.S. Senate Report 106.s.Rep 229 (February 7).

  • Walt, A. (2004). The treatment of age and age discrimination in employment in the United States, Canada, and South Africa. Elder Law Review, 3. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://www.usw.edu/au/about/acadorg/clb/sl/research/elderlaw/elderlawreview/volume 3.

  • World Health Organization. (2002) Active aging: A policy framework. Retrieved December 19, 2005, from http://www.who.int/hpr.ageing/ActiveAgeingPolicyFrame.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful for the support of the Rhode Island College Faculty Fund and for the sabbatical leave granted by Rhode Island College to carry out this research. She is also appreciative of King’s College London, Institute of Gerontology, where she was able to work on this paper while a visiting scholar in 2006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gerontology Center, Rhode Island College, 600 Mt. Pleasant Avenue, Providence, RI, 02908, USA

    Rachel Filinson

Authors
  1. Rachel Filinson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Filinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Filinson, R. Age Discrimination Legislation in the U.K.: A Comparative and Gerontological Analysis. J Cross Cult Gerontol 23, 225–237 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-008-9066-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10823-008-9066-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation