Design of a tripartite network for the prediction of drug targets
Drug-target networks have aided in many target prediction studies aiming at drug repurposing or the analysis of side effects. Conventional drug-target networks are bipartite. They contain two different types of nodes representing drugs and targets, respectively, and edges indicating pairwise drug-target interactions. In this work, we introduce a tripartite network consisting of drugs, other bioactive compounds, and targets from different sources. On the basis of analog relationships captured in the network and so-called neighbor targets of drugs, new drug targets can be inferred. The tripartite network was found to have a stable structure and simulated network growth was accompanied by a steady increase in assortativity, reflecting increasing correlation between degrees of connected nodes leading to even network connectivity. Local drug environments in the tripartite network typically contained neighbor targets and revealed interesting drug-compound-target relationships for further analysis. Candidate targets were prioritized. The tripartite network design extends standard drug-target networks and provides additional opportunities for drug target prediction.
KeywordsActive compounds Drugs Biological targets Tripartite drug-target network Network properties Target prediction
We thank the OpenEye Scientific Software, Inc., for providing a free academic license of the OpenEye chemistry toolkit.
- 2.Boran AD, Iyengar R (2010) Systems approaches to polypharmacology and drug discovery. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 13:297–309Google Scholar
- 19.Wishart DS, Feunang YD, Guo AC, Lo EJ, Marcu A, Grant JR, Sajed T, Johnson D, Li C, Sayeeda Z, Assempour N, Iynkkaran I, Liu Y, Maciejewski A, Gale N, Wilson A, Chin L, Cummings R, Le D, Pon A, Knox C, Wilson M (2017) DrugBank 5.0: a major update to the DrugBank database for 2018. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1037 Google Scholar
- 21.Kenny PW, Sadowski J (2004) Chemoinformatics in drug discovery. In: Oprea TI (ed) Structure modification in chemical databases. Wiley, Weinheim, pp 271–285Google Scholar
- 25.OEChem TK version 2.0.0; OpenEye Scientific Software. Santa Fe, NMGoogle Scholar
- 28.Csardi G, Nepusz T (2006) The iGraph software package for complex network research. InterJ Complex Sys 1695:1–9Google Scholar
- 29.Maggiora GM, Shanmugasundaram V (2004) Molecular similarity measures. In: Bajorath J (ed) Chemoinformatics—concepts, methods, and tools for drug discovery. Humana Press, TotowaGoogle Scholar