Skip to main content
Log in

FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets

  • Published:
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design Aims and scope Submit manuscript


The docking performance of the FRED and HYBRID programs are evaluated on two standardized datasets from the Docking and Scoring Symposium of the ACS Spring 2011 national meeting. The evaluation includes cognate docking and virtual screening performance. FRED docks 70 % of the structures to within 2 Å in the cognate docking test. In the virtual screening test, FRED is found to have a mean AUC of 0.75. The HYBRID program uses a modified version of FRED’s algorithm that uses both ligand- and structure-based information to dock molecules, which increases its mean AUC to 0.78. HYBRID can also implicitly account for protein flexibility by making use of multiple crystal structures. Using multiple crystal structures improves HYBRID’s performance (mean AUC 0.80) with a negligible increase in docking time (~15 %).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others


  1. Cross JB, Thompson DC, Rai BK, Baber JC, Fan KY, Hu Y, Humblet C (2009) Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy. J Chem Inf Model 49:1455–1474

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli A, Clarke B, LaLonde J, Lambert ML, Lindvall M, Nevins N, Semus SF, Senger S, Tedesco G, Wall ID, Woolven JM, Pieshoff CE, Head MS (2006) A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J Med Chem 49:5912–5913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McGann MR (2011) FRED pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy. J Chem Inf Model 51:578–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummings MD, DesJarlais RL, Gibbs AC, Mohan V, Jaegar EP (2005) Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. J Med Chem 48:962–976

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nicholls A (2008) What do we know and when do we know it? J Comput Aided Mol Des 22:133–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tuccinardi T, Botta M, Giordano A, Martinelli A (2010) Protein kinases: docking and homology modeling reliability. J Chem Inf Model 50:1432–1441

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hawkins PCD, Skillman AG, Warren GL, Ellingson BA, Stahl MT (2010) Conformer generation with OMEGA: algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the protein databank and Cambridge structural database. J Chem Inf Model 50:572–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Perola E, Charifson PS (2004) Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding. J Med Chem 47:2499–2510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brown RD, Martin YC (1997) The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding. J Chem Inf Model 37:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Accessed 30 April 2012

  11. Hartshorn MJ, Verdonk ML, Chessari G, Brewerton SC, Mooij WTM, Mortenson PN, Murray CW (2007) Diverse, high-quality test set for the validation of protein-ligand docking performance. J Med Chem 50:726–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jain A (2008) Bias, reporting and sharing: computational evaluations of docking methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des 22:201–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang N, Shoichet BK, Irwin JJ (2006) Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. J Med Chem 49:6789–6801

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olah M, Mracec M, Ostopovici L, Rad R, Bora A, Hadaruga N, Olah I, Banda M, Simon Z, Mracec M, Oprea TI (2004) Chemo informatics in drug discovery. In: Oprea TI (ed) WOMBAT: world of molecular bioactivity. Wiley-VCH, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark McGann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McGann, M. FRED and HYBRID docking performance on standardized datasets. J Comput Aided Mol Des 26, 897–906 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: