Advertisement

Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 349–369 | Cite as

Docking and quantitative structure–activity relationship studies for 3-fluoro-4-(pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-yloxy)aniline, 3-fluoro-4-(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-4-yloxy)aniline, and 4-(4-amino-2-fluorophenoxy)-2-pyridinylamine derivatives as c-Met kinase inhibitors

  • Julio CaballeroEmail author
  • Miguel Quiliano
  • Jans H. Alzate-Morales
  • Mirko Zimic
  • Eric Deharo
Article

Abstract

We have performed docking of 3-fluoro-4-(pyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-4-yloxy)aniline (FPTA), 3-fluoro-4-(1H-pyrrolo[2,3-b]pyridin-4-yloxy)aniline (FPPA), and 4-(4-amino-2-fluorophenoxy)-2-pyridinylamine (AFPP) derivatives complexed with c-Met kinase to study the orientations and preferred active conformations of these inhibitors. The study was conducted on a selected set of 103 compounds with variations both in structure and activity. Docking helped to analyze the molecular features which contribute to a high inhibitory activity for the studied compounds. In addition, the predicted biological activities of the c-Met kinase inhibitors, measured as IC50 values were obtained by using quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) methods: Comparative molecular similarity analysis (CoMSIA) and multiple linear regression (MLR) with topological vectors. The best CoMSIA model included steric, electrostatic, hydrophobic, and hydrogen bond-donor fields; furthermore, we found a predictive model containing 2D-autocorrelation descriptors, GETAWAY descriptors (GETAWAY: Geometry, Topology and Atom-Weight AssemblY), fragment-based polar surface area (PSA), and MlogP. The statistical parameters: cross-validate correlation coefficient and the fitted correlation coefficient, validated the quality of the obtained predictive models for 76 compounds. Additionally, these models predicted adequately 25 compounds that were not included in the training set.

Keywords

c-Met kinase inhibitors Molecular docking Quantitative structure–activity relationships CoMSIA Topological descriptors 

Notes

Acknowledgments

J.C. thanks “Becas Universidad de Talca” for financial support through a doctoral fellowship. M.Q. and E.D. gratefully acknowledge the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (UMR 152 IRD-UPS) for financial support. J.H.A.M. acknowledges the financial support through project FONDECYT No 11100177.

Supplementary material

10822_2011_9425_MOESM1_ESM.doc (3.3 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 3396 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Liu X, Yao W, Newton RC, Scherle PA (2008) Targeting the c-MET signaling pathway for cancer therapy. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 17(7):997–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Peruzzi B, Bottaro DP (2006) Targeting the c-Met signaling pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 12(12):3657–3660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huh C-G, Factor VM, Sánchez A, Uchida K, Conner EA, Thorgeirsson SS (2004) Hepatocyte growth factor/c-met signaling pathway is required for efficient liver regeneration and repair. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(13):4477–4482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lesko E, Majka M (2008) The biological role of HGF-MET axis in tumor growth and development of metastasis. Front Biosci 13(13):1271–1280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Comoglio PM, Giordano S, Trusolino L (2008) Drug development of MET inhibitors: targeting oncogene addiction and expedience. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7(6):504–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Porter J (2010) Small molecule c-Met kinase inhibitors: a review of recent patents. Expert Opin Ther Pat 20(2):159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eder JP, Vande Woude GF, Boerner SA, LoRusso PM (2009) Novel therapeutic inhibitors of the c-Met signaling pathway in cancer. Clin Cancer Res 15(7):2207–2214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schroeder GM, Chen X-T, Williams DK, Nirschl DS, Cai Z-W, Wei D, Tokarski JS, An Y, Sack J et al (2008) Identification of pyrrolo[2, 1-f][1, 2, 4]triazine-based inhibitors of Met kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18(6):1945–1951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim KS, Zhang L, Schmidt R, Cai Z-W, Wei D, Williams DK, Lombardo LJ, Trainor GL, Xie D et al (2008) Discovery of pyrrolopyridine–pyridone based inhibitors of met kinase: synthesis, X-ray crystallographic analysis, and biological activities. J Med Chem 51(17):5330–5341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Williams DK, Chen X-T, Tarby C, Kaltenbach R, Cai Z-W, Tokarski JS, An Y, Sack JS, Wautlet B et al (2010) Design, synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel biarylamine-based Met kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 20(9):2998–3002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cai Z-W, Wei D, Schroeder GM, Cornelius LAM, Kim K, Chen X-T, Schmidt RJ, Williams DK, Tokarski JS et al (2008) Discovery of orally active pyrrolopyridine- and aminopyridine-based Met kinase inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18(11):3224–3229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schroeder GM, An Y, Cai Z-W, Chen X-T, Clark C, Cornelius LAM, Dai J, Gullo-Brown J, Gupta A et al (2009) Discovery of N-(4-(2-Amino-3-chloropyridin-4-yloxy)-3-fluorophenyl)-4-ethoxy-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-2-oxo-1, 2-dihydropyridine-3-carboxamide (BMS-777607), a selective and orally efficacious inhibitor of the met kinase superfamily. J Med Chem 52(5):1251–1254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Albrecht BK, Harmange J-C, Bauer D, Berry L, Bode C, Boezio AA, Chen A, Choquette D, Dussault I et al (2008) Discovery and optimization of triazolopyridazines as potent and selective inhibitors of the c-Met Kinase†. J Med Chem 51(10):2879–2882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boezio AA, Berry L, Albrecht BK, Bauer D, Bellon SF, Bode C, Chen A, Choquette D, Dussault I et al (2009) Discovery and optimization of potent and selective triazolopyridazine series of c-Met inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19(22):6307–6312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    D’Angelo ND, Bellon SF, Booker SK, Cheng Y, Coxon A, Dominguez C, Fellows I, Hoffman D, Hungate R et al (2008) Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of potent c-Met inhibitors. J Med Chem 51(18):5766–5779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Porter J, Lumb S, Lecomte F, Reuberson J, Foley A, Calmiano M, le Riche K, Edwards H, Delgado J et al (2009) Discovery of a novel series of quinoxalines as inhibitors of c-Met kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19(2):397–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Porter J, Lumb S, Franklin RJ, Gascon-Simorte JM, Calmiano M, Riche KL, Lallemand B, Keyaerts J, Edwards H et al (2009) Discovery of 4-azaindoles as novel inhibitors of c-Met kinase. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19(10):2780–2784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Alzate-Morales JH, Caballero J, Vergara-Jaque A, González-Nilo FD (2009) Insights into the structural basis of N2 and O6 substituted guanine derivatives as cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) inhibitors: prediction of the binding modes and potency of the inhibitors by docking and ONIOM calculations. J Chem Inf Model 49(4):886–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alzate-Morales JH, Vergara-Jaque A, Caballero J (2010) Computational study on the interaction of N1 substituted pyrazole derivatives with B-Raf kinase: an unusual water wire hydrogen-bond network and novel interactions at the entrance of the active site. J Chem Inf Model 50(6):1101–1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Larsen CA, Bisson WH, Dashwood RH (2009) Tea catechins inhibit hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET Kinase) activity in human colon cancer cells: kinetic and molecular docking studies. J Med Chem 52(21):6543–6545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fernandez M, Tundidor-Camba A, Caballero J (2005) Modeling of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition by 1H-Pyrazolo[3, 4-d]Pyrimidine derivatives using artificial neural network ensembles. J Chem Inf Model 45(6):1884–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    González M, Caballero J, Helguera A, Garriga M, González G, Fernández M (2006) 2D autocorrelation modelling of the inhibitory activity of cytokinin-derived cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors. Bull Math Biol 68(4):735–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Caballero J, Fernández M, Saavedra M, González-Nilo FD (2008) 2D Autocorrelation, CoMFA, and CoMSIA modeling of protein tyrosine kinases’ inhibition by substituted pyrido[2, 3-d]pyrimidine derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem 16(2):810–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Caballero J, Fernández M, González-Nilo FD (2008) Structural requirements of pyrido[2, 3-d]pyrimidin-7-one as CDK4/D inhibitors: 2D autocorrelation, CoMFA and CoMSIA analyses. Bioorg Med Chem 16(11):6103–6115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gueto C, Ruiz JL, Torres JE, Méndez J, Vivas-Reyes R (2008) Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship studies on novel series of benzotriazine based compounds acting as Src inhibitors using CoMFA and CoMSIA. Bioorg Med Chem 16(5):2439–2447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Alzate-Morales J, Caballero J (2010) Computational study of the interactions between guanine derivatives and cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDK2) by CoMFA and QM/MM. J Chem Inf Model 50(1):110–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muthas D, Sabnis YA, Lundborg M, Karlén A (2008) Is it possible to increase hit rates in structure-based virtual screening by pharmacophore filtering? An investigation of the advantages and pitfalls of post-filtering. J Mol Graph Model 26(8):1237–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Xie H-Z, Li L-L, Ren J-X, Zou J, Yang L, Wei Y-Q, Yang S-Y (2009) Pharmacophore modeling study based on known spleen tyrosine kinase inhibitors together with virtual screening for identifying novel inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 19(7):1944–1949CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uno M, Ban HS, Nabeyama W, Nakamura H (2008) de novo design and synthesis of N-benzylanilines as new candidates for VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Org Biomol Chem 6(6):979–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vieth M, Erickson J, Wang J, Webster Y, Mader M, Higgs R, Watson I (2009) Kinase inhibitor data modeling and de novo inhibitor design with fragment approaches. J Med Chem 52(20):6456–6466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Alzate-Morales JH, Contreras R, Soriano A, Tuñon I, Silla E (2007) A computational study of the protein-ligand interactions in CDK2 inhibitors: using quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics interaction energy as a predictor of the biological activity. Biophys J 92(2):430–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Alzate-Morales JH, Caballero J, Gonzalez-Nilo FD, Contreras R (2009) A computational ONIOM model for the description of the H-bond interactions between NU2058 analogues and CDK2 active site. Chem Phys Lett 479(1–3):149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Villacañas O, Pérez JJ, Rubio-Martínez J (2002) Structural analysis of the inhibition of Cdk4 and Cdk6 by p16INK4a through molecular dynamics simulations. J Biomol Struct Dyn 20:347–358Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Asses Y, Leroux V, Tairi-Kellou S, Dono R, Maina F, Maigret B (2009) Analysis of c-Met kinase domain complexes: a new specific catalytic site receptor model for defining binding modes of ATP-competitive ligands. Chem Biol Drug Des 74(6):560–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Klebe G, Abraham U, Mietzner T (1994) Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. J Med Chem 37(24):4130–4146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wellenzohn B, Liedl KR, Rode BM, Zaheer-ul-haq (2003) Molecular docking studies of natural cholinesterase-inhibiting steroidal alkaloids from sarcococca saligna. J Med Chem 46(23):5087–5090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rojo LE, Alzate-Morales J, Saavedra IN, Davies P, Maccioni RB (2010) Selective interaction of lansoprazole and astemizole with tau polymers: potential new clinical use in diagnosis of alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer Dis 19(2):573–589Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hanessian S, Moitessier N, Therrien E (2001) A comparative docking study and the design of potentially selective MMP inhibitors. J Comput Aided Mol Des 15(10):873–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Caballero J, Vergara-Jaque A, Fernández M, Coll D (2009) Docking and quantitative structure–activity relationship studies for sulfonyl hydrazides as inhibitors of cytosolic human branched-chain amino acid aminotransferase. Mol Divers 13(4):493–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lagos CF, Caballero J, Gonzalez-Nilo FD, David Pessoa-Mahana C, Perez-Acle T (2008) Docking and quantitative structure-activity relationship studies for the bisphenylbenzimidazole family of non-nucleoside inhibitors of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. Chem Biol Drug Des 72(5):360–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Abagyan R, Totrov M, Kuznetsov D (1994) ICM–A new method for protein modeling and design: Applications to docking and structure prediction from the distorted native conformation. J Comput Chem 15(5):488–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Molecular Editor, version 2.5, La Jolla, CA, Molsoft LLC, 2006Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    ICM, version 3.4-8, La Jolla, CA, Molsoft LLC, 2006Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    An J, Totrov M, Abagyan R (2005) Pocketome via comprehensive identification and classification of ligand binding envelopes. Mol Cell Proteomics 4(6):752–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Caballero J, Fernández M (2008) Artificial neural networks from MATLAB in medicinal chemistry. Bayesian-regularized genetic neural networks (BRGNN): application to the prediction of the antagonistic activity against human platelet thrombin receptor (PAR-1). Curr Top Med Chem 8(18):1580–1605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    DRAGON, version 3.0, Milano, Italy, Milano Chemometrics, 2003Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Consonni V, Todeschini R, Pavan M (2002) Structure/response correlations and similarity/diversity analysis by GETAWAY descriptors. 1. Theory of the novel 3D molecular descriptors. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 42(3):682–692Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fernández M, Caballero J (2007) QSAR modeling of matrix metalloproteinase inhibition by N-hydroxy-[alpha]-phenylsulfonylacetamide derivatives. Bioorg Med Chem 15(18):6298–6310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Viswanadhan VN, Ghose AK, Revankar GR, Robins RK (1989) Atomic physicochemical parameters for three dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 29(3):163–172Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ertl P, Rohde B, Selzer P (2000) Fast calculation of molecular polar surface area as a sum of fragment-based contributions and its application to the prediction of drug transport properties. J Med Chem 43(20):3714–3717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Miroguchi I, Hirono S, Liu Q, Nakagome I, Matsushita Y (1992) Simple method of calculating octanol/water partition coefficient. Chem Pharm Bull 40:127–130Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    de Oliveira DB, Gaudio AC (2000) BuildQSAR: a new computer program for QSAR analysis. Quant Struct Act Relat 19(6):599–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Cronin MTD, Schultz TW (2003) Pitfalls in QSAR. J Mol Struct 622(1–2):39–51Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fernandez M, Carreiras MC, Marco JL, Caballero J (2006) Modeling of acetylcholinesterase inhibition by tacrine analogues using Bayesian-regularized Genetic Neural Networks and ensemble averaging. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 21(6):647–661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fatemi MH, Gharaghani S (2007) A novel QSAR model for prediction of apoptosis-inducing activity of 4-aryl-4-H-chromenes based on support vector machine. Bioorg Med Chem 15(24):7746–7754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    González MP, Terán C, Teijeira M, González-Moa MJ (2005) GETAWAY descriptors to predicting A2A adenosine receptors agonists. Eur J Med Chem 40(11):1080–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002) Beware of q2!. J Mol Graph Model 20(4):269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julio Caballero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miguel Quiliano
    • 2
  • Jans H. Alzate-Morales
    • 1
  • Mirko Zimic
    • 2
  • Eric Deharo
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Centro de Bioinformática y Simulación Molecular, Facultad de Ingeniería en BioinformáticaUniversidad de TalcaTalcaChile
  2. 2.Bioinformatics Unit-Drug Design Group, Laboratorios de Investigación y Desarrollo, Facultad de Ciencias y FilosofíaUniversidad Peruana Cayetano HerediaLimaPerú
  3. 3.UPS, UMR 152 (Laboratoire de Pharmacochimie des Substances Naturelles et Pharmacophores Redox)Université de ToulouseToulouse cedex 9France
  4. 4.IRD; UMR-152LimaPerú

Personalised recommendations