Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 19, Issue 2, pp 201–221 | Cite as

Eco-efficient choice of cropping system for reducing nitrate-N leaching in an agricultural watershed

  • Emmanuel K. Yiridoe
  • Frederick Amon-Armah
  • Dale Hebb
  • Rob Jamieson
Article
  • 178 Downloads

Abstract

Eco-efficiency analysis framework was used to evaluate joint economic and environmentally optimal N application rates for alternative cropping systems managed in a watershed in Atlantic Canada. Eco-efficiency indexes were estimated as the ratio of economic returns from N fertilizer application to groundwater-N leaching associated with crop production. Trade-offs between crop yield and associated reduction in groundwater-N leaching were also estimated. Data for the analysis were generated using the soil and water analysis tool modeling, and allowed for evaluating crop yield and groundwater-N leaching effects for a given crop in rotations assumed to be managed at varying N fertilizer application rates. The cropping systems evaluated included: (i) corn-based cropping systems involving corn–corn–alfalfa–alfalfa–alfalfa (CCAAA, and CCCAA) rotations; (ii) potato-based cropping systems involving potato–corn–barley–potato–corn (PCBPC and PBWPC); and (iii) vegetable-horticulture cropping system involving potato–winter wheat–carrot–corn. Cropping systems were compared under conventional tillage (CT) and no-till (NT) systems. Estimated eco-efficient N fertilizer rates were substantially lower than current provincial nutrient management plan (NMP)-recommended rates, and estimated maximum economic rate of nitrogen fertilizer. However, the actual amounts depended on the crop and rotation system. CCAAA-CT was the eco-efficient choice of rotation system among the corn-based cropping systems considered. Similarly, PCBPC-CT was the eco-efficient choice among the potato-based production systems. In addition, when the NMP-recommended N rate was replaced by the eco-efficient rate for the vegetable horticulture cropping system, the eco-efficient cropping system shifted from a rotation involving CT to a NT system.

Keywords

Eco-efficiency Agriculture sustainability Nitrogen fertilizer Nitrate-N pollution 

JEL Classification

Q57 Q12 Q53 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research from which this manuscript was generated was funded by Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), under the Watershed Evaluation of Beneficial Management Practices (WEBs) research project.

References

  1. Ahmad, H. M. N., Sinclair, A., Jamieson, R., Madani, A., Havard, P., Hebb, D., et al. (2011). Modeling sediment and nitrogen export for a rural watershed in eastern Canada using the SWAT model. Journal of Environmental Quality, 40, 1182–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amon-Armah, F., Yiridoe, E. K., Ahmad, N. H., Hebb, D., Jamieson, R., Burton, D., et al. (2013). Effect of nutrient management planning on crop yield, nitrate leaching and sediment loading in Thomas Brook Watershed. Environmental Management, 52(5), 1177–1191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amon-Armah, F., Yiridoe, E. K., Jamieson, R., & Hebb, D. (2015). Comparison of crop yield and pollution production response to nitrogen fertilization models, accounting for crop rotation effect. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 39(3), 245–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belanger, G., Walsh, J. R., Richards, J. E., Milburn, P. H., & Ziadi, N. (2001). Predicting nitrogen fertilizer requirements of potatoes in Atlantic Canada with soil nitrate determinations. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 81, 535–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brussaard, L., Caron, P., Campbell, B., Lipper, L., Mainka, S., Rabbinge, R., et al. (2010). Reconciling biodiversity conservation and food security: Scientific challenges for a new agriculture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cann, D., MacDougall, J., & Hilchey, J. (1965). Soil survey of Kings County, Nova Scotia. Report no. 15. Nova Scotia Soil Survey. Truro, NS: Nova Scotia Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  7. Choo, E. U., Schoner, B., & Wedley, W. C. (1999). Interpretation of criteria weights in multicriteria decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 37(3), 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Del Grosso, S. J., Parton, W. J., Mosier, A. R., Ojima, D. S., Kulmala, A. E., & Phongpan, S. (2000). General model for \(\text{ N }_{2}\text{ O }\) and \(\text{ N }_{2}\) gas emissions from soils due to denitrification. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 14(4), 1045–1060. doi: 10.1029/1999GB001225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dick, W. A., Roseberg, R. J., McCoy, E. L., Edwards, W. M., & Haghiri, F. (1989). Surface hydrologic response of soils to no-tillage. Soil Science Society American Journal, 53, 1520–1526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fuller, K. D., Gordon, R., Grimmett, M., Fillmorea, S., Madani, A., VanRoestele, J., et al. (2010). Seasonal and crop rotational effects of manure management on nitrate-nitrogen leaching in Nova Scotia. Agricultural Ecosystems and Environment, 137, 267–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gauthier, M. J., Camporese, M., Rivard, C., Paniconi, C., & Larocque, M. (2009). A modeling study of heterogeneity and SW/GW interactions. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussion, 6, 2751–2793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gómez-Limón, J. A., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Reig-Martínez, E. (2012). Eco-efficiency assessment of olive farms in Andalusia. Land Use Policy, 29, 395–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huppes, G., & Ishikawa, M. (2005). Eco-efficiency and its terminology. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. International Council on Metals and the Environment. (2001). Efficiency and materials. International Council on Metals and the Environment (ICME): Ottawa.Google Scholar
  15. Jameison, R. C., Gordon, R. J., Trattie, S. C., & Stratton, G. W. (2003). Sources and persistence of fecal coliform bacteria in a rural watershed. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 38, 33–47.Google Scholar
  16. Janmaat, J. (2007). Divergent drinking water perceptions in the Annapolis Valley. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 33(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Job, C. A. (1996). Benefits and costs of wellhead protection. Ground Water Monitoring and Remediation, 16(2), 65–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jollands, N., Lermit, J., & Patterson, M. (2003). The usefulness of aggregate indicators in policy making and evaluation: A discussion with application to eco-efficiency indicators in New Zealand. ISEE working paper.Google Scholar
  19. Jollands, N., Lermit, J., & Patterson, M. (2004). Aggregate eco-efficiency indices for New Zealand: A principal component analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 293–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Khakbazan, M., Hamilton, C., Moulin, A., Belcher, K., Mohr, R., Volkmar, K., et al. (2009). Modeling economic and agro-environmental dynamics of potato production systems. Journal of Bioeconomics, 11, 65–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kim, S., & Dale, B. E. (2008). Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on greenhouse gas emissions and economics of corn production. Environment Science Technology, 42, 6028–6033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moerman, D., & Briggins, D. (1994). Nova Scotia farm well water quality assurance study, final report. Halifax: Departments of the Environment, Agriculture and Marketing, and Health, Government of Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
  23. Nyborg, M., & Malhi, S. S. (1989). Effect of zero and conventional tillage on barley yield and nitrate-N content, moisture and temperature of soil. Soil Tillage Research, 15, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Park, S. E. (2010). More than eco-efficiency is required to improve food security. Crop Science, 50, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rajsic, P., & Weersink, A. (2008). Do farmers waste fertilizer? A comparison of ex post optimal nitrogen rates and ex-ante recommended rates by model, site and year. Agricultural Systems, 97, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reith, C. C., & Guidry, M. J. (2003). Eco-efficiency analysis of an agricultural research complex. Journal of Environmental Management, 68, 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberts, W. S., & Swinton, S. (1996). Economic methods for comparing alternative crop production systems: A review of the literature. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 11, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R., & Petersen, H. (2003). An introduction to corporate environmental management–Striving for sustainability. Sheffield: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
  29. Schaltegger, S., & Sturm, A. (1990). Ökologische rationalität [Environmental rationality]. Die Unternehmung, 4, 273–290.Google Scholar
  30. Schmidheiny, S. (1992). Changing course: Global business perspective on development and the environment. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schmidt, J. P., DeJoia, A. J., Ferguson, R. B., Taylor, R. K., Young, R. K., & Havlin, J. L. (2002). Corn yield response to nitrogen at multiple in-field locations. Agronomy Journal, 94(4), 798–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sheriff, G. (2005). Efficient waste? Why farmers over-apply nutrients and the implications for policy design. Review of Agricultural Economics, 27, 542–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sinclair, A., Hebb, D., Jamieson, R., Gordon, R., Benedict, K., Fuller, K., et al. (2009). Growing season surface water loading of fecal indicator organisms within a rural watershed. Water Research, 43, 1199–1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Statistics Canada. (2007). Census of agriculture (2007), Statistic Canada, farm data and farm operator data, 2006. Catalogue no. 95-629-XWE. Accessed May 29, 2010, from http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/95-629-XIE/4/4.3-1_A.htm#12.
  35. Stockle, C. O., Papendick, R. I., Saxton, K. E., Campbell, G. S., & Van Evert, F. K. (1994). A framework for evaluating the sustainability of agricultural production systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture, 9(1–2), 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stuart, V., Harker, D. B., Scott, T., & Clearwater, R. L. (2010). Watershed evaluation of beneficial management practices (WEBs): Towards enhanced agricultural landscape planning; four year review (2004/5-2007/8). Ottawa: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.Google Scholar
  37. Timmer, D. K., de Loe, R. C., & Kreutzwiser, R. D. (2007). Source water protection in the Annapolis Valley, Nova Scotia: Lessons for building local capacity. Land Use Policy, 24, 187–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Trattrie, S., Abdirashid, E., Gordon, R., Madani, A., Stratton, G., Jamieson, R., Hebb, D., & Fuller, K. (2004). Integrated surface water quality assessment of rural watershed in Nova Scotia, Canada. Paper presented at the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers (ASAE/CSAE) annual international meeting paper no: 042007, Ottawa, ON, August 1–August 4.Google Scholar
  39. Tyler, D. D., & Thomas, G. W. (1977). Lysimeter measurements of nitrate and chloride losses from soil under conventional and no-tillage corn. Journal of Environmental Quality, 6, 63–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Meensel, J., Lauwers, L., Van Huylenbroeck, G., & Van Passel, S. (2010). Comparing frontier methods for economic-environmental trade-off analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 207, 1027–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van Passel, S., Nevens, F., Mathijs, E., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2007). Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecology Economics, 62(1), 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2000). Eco-efficiency: Creating more value with less impact. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
  43. Yiridoe, E. K., Chen, Q., Fry, R., Lynch, D., & Price, G. (2015). Cost analysis and life-cycle environmental impacts of three value-added novel bioproducts: processing and production. Natural Resources Research, 24(1), 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Yiridoe, E. K., & Weersink, A. (1998). Marginal abatement costs of reducing groundwater-N pollution with intensive farm management choices. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 27, 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yiridoe, E. K., & Weersink, A. (1997). A review and evaluation of agroecosystem health analysis: The role of economics. Agricultural Systems, 55(4), 601–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Business and Social SciencesDalhousie University (Agricultural Campus)TruroCanada
  2. 2.Cocoa Research Institute of Ghana (Social Science and Statistics Unit)Akim-TafoGhana
  3. 3.Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research CentreKentvilleCanada
  4. 4.Department of Process Engineering and Applied ScienceDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations