Advertisement

Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 165–185 | Cite as

Utopia competition: a new approach to the micro-foundations of sustainability transitions

  • Isabel Almudi
  • Francisco Fatas-Villafranca
  • Jason PottsEmail author
Article

Abstract

We present a new evolutionary political economy approach to the study of transition dynamics based on a co-evolutionary model of differential citizen contributions to competing ‘utopias’—market fundamentalism, socialism, and environmentalism. We model sustainability transitions as an outcome of ‘utopia competition’ in which environmentalism manages to coexist with the market, while socialism vanishes. Our simulation-based framework suggests that the individual economic contributions of citizens to the battle of ideas—both the distribution within a utopia, and the interaction between different utopias—are crucial but much overlooked micro-factors in explaining the dynamics of sustainability transitions.

Keywords

Utopia Sustainability transitions Idea competition Climate change Citizens Co-evolution Evolutionary political economy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Australian Research Council (Grant No. FT120100509).

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail?. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Almudi, I., Fatas-Villafranca, F., Izquierdo, L. R., & Potts, J. (2015). The economics of utopia: A co-evolutionary model of ideas, citizens and civilization. Working Paper, RMIT, UZ & UBU.Google Scholar
  3. Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L., Daily, G., Ehrlich, P., Heal, G., Levin, S., Maler, K., Schneider, S., & Walker, B. (2004). Are we consuming too much? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18, 147–172.Google Scholar
  4. Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barrett, S. (2007). Why cooperate? The incentives to supply global public goods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analysing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37, 407–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkhout, F. (2006). Normative expectations in systems innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18, 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulding, K. (1978). Ecodynamics. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Brekke, K. A., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008). The behavioral economics of climate change. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24, 280–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Costa, D., & Kahn, M. (2003). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1, 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302, 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dopfer, K. (1991). Towards a theory of economic institutions: Synergy and path dependency. Journal of Economic Issues, 25, 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dopfer, K., & Potts, J. (2008). General theory of economic evolution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Earl, P., & Potts, J. (2004). The market for preferences. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 28, 619–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fatas-Villafranca, F., Saura, D., & Vazquez, F. J. (2011). A dynamic model of public opinion formation. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 13, 417–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geels, F. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31, 1257–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33, 897–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geels, F. (2010). Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective. Research Policy, 39, 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goulder, L., & Pizer, W. (2008). Climate change, economics of. In S. Durlauf & L. Blume (Eds.), New Palgrave dictionary of economics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Gowdy, J. (1994). Co-evolutionary economics. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Gowdy, J. (2008). Behavioral economics and climate change policy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68, 632–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  23. Hodgson, G. (1999). Economics and Utopia: Why the learning economy is not the end of history. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hofbauer, J., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Joosten, R. (2006). Walras and Darwin: An odd couple. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 191, 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kates, R. W., Clark, W. C., Corell, R., Hall, J. M., Jaeger, C. C., Lowe, I., McCarthy, J. J., Schellnhuber, H. J., Bolin, B., Dickson, N. M., Faucheux, S., Gallopin, G. C., Grübler, A., Huntley, B., Jäger, J., Jodha, N. S., Kasperson, R. E., Mabogunje, A., Matson, P., Mooney, H., Moore, B. III, O’Riordan, T., & Svedlin, U. (2001). Environment and development: Sustainability science. Science, 292, 641–42.Google Scholar
  27. Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar
  28. Leighton, W., & Lopez, E. (2012). Madmen, intellectuals and academic scribblers: The economic engine of political change. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Towards a research agenda on sustainability transitions. Introduction paper to special section on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41, 955–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Markey-Towler, B. (2016). Law of the jungle: Firm survival and price dynamics in evolutionary markets. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 26, 655–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Montgomery, S., & Chirot, D. (2015). The shape of the new. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: Overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105, 1339–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. (1989). Constitution and commitment: The evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. Journal of Economic History, 49, 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ortega-Egea, J. M., García-de-Frutos, N., & Antolín-López, R. (2014). Why do some people do “more” to mitigate climate change than others? Exploring heterogeneity in psycho-social associations. PLoS ONE, 9(9), e106645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Page, B., & Shapiro, R. (1992). The rational public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pizer, W. (2002). Combining price and quantity controls to mitigate global climate change. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 409–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sato, Y., & Crutchfield, J. (2003). Coupled replicator equations for the dynamics of learning in multiagent systems. Physical Review, 67, 015206 (R).Google Scholar
  39. Sexton, S. (2011). Conspicuous conservation. http://works.bepress.com/sexton/11.
  40. Stern, P., & Dietz, T. (1994). The value basis of environmental concern. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Van den Bergh, J., Truffer, B., & Kallis, G. (2011). Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabel Almudi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Francisco Fatas-Villafranca
    • 1
  • Jason Potts
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and BusinessUniversity of ZaragozaZaragozaSpain
  2. 2.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.School of Economics, Finance and MarketingRMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations