Skip to main content
Log in

Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics

Abstract

Advances in the study of social behavior require a revision in the economic concept of the invisible hand, which states that self-interested behavior leads to well-functioning societies without individuals having the welfare of the society in mind. Evolutionary theory shows that self-interest does not robustly benefit the common good because behaviors that are “for the good of the group” seldom maximize relative fitness within the group. The evolution of group-level functional organization requires a process of group-level selection. Species that have become highly adaptive at the group level are called ultrasocial. The idea that an invisible hand leads to social harmony is valid primarily for ultrasocial species, where selection at the group level results in individual-level behaviors that produce group-beneficial outcomes. Individuals do not necessarily have the welfare of the group in mind, but neither do their behaviors or underlying proximate mechanisms resemble the economic concept of self-interest. Evolutionary science therefore provides a valid concept of the invisible hand, but one that is different from the received version, with far-reaching implications for economics, politics, and public policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The Origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bearder, S. K. (1999). Physical and social diversity among nocturnal primates: A new view based on long term research. Primates, 40, 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beinhocker, E. D. (2006). Origin of wealth: Evolution, complexity, and the radical remaking of economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: Egalitarianism and the evolution of human altruism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, C. (2011). Moral ons: The evolution of virtue, altruism, and shame. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Social capital and community governance. The Economic Journal, 112, F419–F436. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S. (2009). Did warfare among ancestral hunter-gatherers affect the evolution of human social behavior? Science, 324, 1293–1298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., Richerson, P. J., & Henrich, J. (2011). The cultural niche: Why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10918–10925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin, I. (2007). Collective minds. Nature, 445(7129), 715. doi:10.1038/445715a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couzin, I. D., Ioannou, C. C., Demirel, G., Gross, T., Torney, C., Hartnett, A., Conradt, L., Levin, S. A., & Leonard, N. E. (2011). Democratic consensus in animal groups. Science, 334, 1578–1580.

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1835). Democracy in America (J. P. Mayer Ed.). Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

  • Deacon, T. W. (1998). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1996). Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, A. M. (1987). Welfare economics. In J. Eatwell, M. Milgate, & P. Newman (Eds.), The new palgrave dictionary of economics (pp. 889–895). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R. (2011). The Darwin economy: Liberty, competition, and the common good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in positive economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Gintis, H., Bowles, S., Boyd, R., & Fehr, E. (2005). Moral sentiments and material interests. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Lewontin, R. C. (1979). The spandrels of San Marco and the panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist program. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205, 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. (2003). The microfoundations of macroeconomics: An evolutionary perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J., & Seidl, I. (2004). Economic man and selfish genes: The relevance of group selection to economic policy. Journal of Socioeconomics, 33, 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J., & Krall, L. (2013). Ultrasociality and the origin of the Anthropocene. Ecological Economics, 95, 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J., & Krall, L. (2014). Agriculture and the evolution of human ultrasociality. Journal of Bioeconomics, 16(2), 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, S. W. J., & Webster, S. (1996). A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1231–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. (1988). The fatal conceit. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., & Quandt, R. (1980). Microeconomic theory: A mathematical approach. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J. (2003). Cultural group selection, coevolutionary processes and large-scale cooperation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 53, 3–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., & Gintis, H. (2004). Foundations of human sociality: economic experiments and ethnographic evidence from fifteen small-scale societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henrich, J., Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (2012). The puzzle of monogamous marriage. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 367(1589), 657–669. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, G. M., & Thorbjorn, K. (2010). Darwin’s conjecture: The search of general principles of social and economic evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (2011). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of human understanding. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. J. (2006). Evolution in four dimension: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H., & Hill, K. (1985). Food sharing among Ache foragers: Tests of explanatory hypotheses. Current Anthropology, 26, 223–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, E., & Hanauer, N. (2011). The Gardens of democracy: A new American story of citizenship, the economy, and the role of government. Seattle: Sasquatch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1970). Origin of eukaryotic cells. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mas-Colell, A., Whinston, M., & Green, J. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmary, E. (1995). The major transitions of life. New York: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Szathmary, E. (1999). The origins of life: From the birth of life to the origin of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134(3489), 1501–1506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinnis, M. D. (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (1989). More heat than light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Okasha, S. (2006). Evolution and the levels of selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The Evolution of institutions for collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100, 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagel, M., & Mace, R. (2004). The cultural wealth of nations. Nature, 428, 275–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, K., & Wilkinson, J. B. (2009). The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. London: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (2012). The false allure of group selection. Retrieved July 20, 2012, from http://edge.org/conversation/the-false-allure-of-group-selection.

  • Pruitt, J. N., & Goodnight, C. J. (2014). Site-specific group selection drives locally adapted group compositions. Nature, 514(7522), 359–362. doi:10.1038/nature13811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D. (2010). Honeybee democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley, T. D., Visscher, P. K., Schlegel, T., Hogan, P. M., Franks, N. R., & Marshall, J. R. (2012). Stop signals provide cross inhibition in collective decision-making by honeybee swarms. Science, 335(6064), 108–111. doi:10.1126/science.1210361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments. New York: Empire.

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. New York: Simon and Brown.

  • Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, C., Wilson, D. S., & Wilcox, R. S. (2006). Social foraging in Bufo americanus tadpoles. Animal Behaviour, 72(6), 1451–1456. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. (2011). Primate behavioral ecology (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). Why we cooperate. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (2003). Historical dynamics: Why states rise and fall. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (2005). War and peace and war. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turchin, P. (2010). Warfare and the evolution of social complexity: A multilevel selection approach. Structure and Dynamics, 4(3), 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1908). Professor Clark’s economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 22, 147–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walras, L. (1874). Elements of pure economics: Or the theory of social wealth. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, B. E. (2006). Brain and culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C. (1966). Adaptation and natural selection: A critique of some current evolutionary thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2012a). Clash of Paradigms: Why proponents of multilevel selection theory and inclusive fitness theory sometimes (but not always) misunderstand each other. Social Evolution Forum.

  • Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2004). The new fable of the bees: Multilevel selection, adaptive societies, and the concept of self interest. Advances in Austrian Economics, 7(04), 201–220. doi:10.1016/S1529-2134(04)07009-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2012). A tale of two classics. New Scientist, 30, 30–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (2012). The Social conquest of earth. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. D. (2014). Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37, 395–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D. S. (2015). Does altruism exist? Culture, Genes, and the welfare of others. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Sloan Wilson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wilson, D.S., Gowdy, J.M. Human ultrasociality and the invisible hand: foundational developments in evolutionary science alter a foundational concept in economics. J Bioecon 17, 37–52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-014-9192-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-014-9192-x

Keywords

Navigation