Sustainable cooperation needs tinkering with both rules and social motivation

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abers, R. N. (2007). Organizing for governance: Building collaboration in Brazilian river basins. World Development, 35, 1450–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, A., & Chhatre, A. (2006). Explaining success on the commons: Community. Forest governance in the Indian himalaya. World Development, 34, 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn, T. K., Ostrom, E., & Walker, J. (2010). A common-pool resource experiment with postgraduate subjects from 41 countries. Ecological Economics, 69, 2624–2633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., Bousquet, F., Cardenas, J., Castillo, D., Lopez, M., Tobias, R., Vollan, B., & Wutich, A. (2011). The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecological Economics, 70, 1571–1579.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Andersson, K. P. (2004). Who talks with whom? The role of repeated interactions in decentralized forest governance. World Development, 32, 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Antinori, C., & Bray, D. B. (2005). Community forest enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: Economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Development, 33, 1529–1543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics (Winter), 19–31.

  8. Cavalcanti, C., Engel, S., & Leibbrandt, A. (2013). Social integration, participation, and community resource management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 65, 262–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cleavenger, D. J., & Munyon, T. P. (2013). It’s how you frame it: Transformational leadership and the meaning of work. Business Horizon, 56, 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Falk, A., & Kosfeld, M. (2006). The hidden costs of control. American Economic Review, 96, 1611–1630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frey, B. S., & Jegen, R. (2001). Motivation crowding theory: A survey of empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 589–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Frieling, M., Lindenberg, S., & Stokman, F. N. (2012). Collaborative communities through coproduction: Two case studies. The American Review of Public Administration. doi:10.1177/0275074012456897.

  13. Gibson, C. C., Williams, J. T., & Ostrom, E. (2005). Local enforcement and better forests. World Development, 33, 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2013). The importance of demonstratively restoring order. PLoS One, 8(6), e65137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Klooster, D. (2000). Institutional choice, community, and struggle: A case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Development, 28, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kruglanski, A. W., Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., Fishbach, A., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lam, W. F. (1996). Improving the performance of small-scale irrigation systems: The effects of technological investments and governance structure on irrigation performance in Nepal. World Development, 24, 1301–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindenberg, S. (1975). Three psychological theories of a classical sociologist. Mens en Maatschappij, 50, 133–153.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lindenberg, S. (1998). Solidarity: Its microfoundations and macro-dependence. A framing approach. In P. Doreian & T. J. Fararo (Eds.), The problem of solidarity: Theories and models (pp. 61–112). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindenberg, S. (2012). How cues in the environment affect normative behavior. In L. Steg, A. E. van den Berg, & J. I. M. de Groot (Eds.), Environmental psychology: An introduction (pp. 119–128). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lindenberg, S., & Frey, B. (1993). Alternatives, frames, and relative prices: A broader view of rational choice. Acta Sociologica, 36, 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindenberg, S., & Foss, N. (2011). Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal-framing and governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 500–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 117–137.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, K. W., & Gulati, A. (2002). What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Development, 30, 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mühlau, P., & Lindenberg, S. (2003). Efficiency wages: Signals or incentives? An empirical study of the relationship between wage and commitment. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 385–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Nunan, F. (2006). Empowerment and institutions: Managing fisheries in Uganda. World Development, 34, 1316–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24, 1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economics Perspectives, 14, 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  31. Prediger, S., Vollan, B., & Frölich, M. (2011). The impact of culture and ecology on cooperation in a common-pool resource experiment. Ecological Economics, 70, 1599–1608.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rustagi, D., Engel, S., & Kosfeld, M. (2010). Conditional cooperation and costly monitoring explain success in forest commons management. Science, 330, 961–965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Varughese, G., & Ostrom, E. (2001). The contested role of heterogeneity in collective action. Some evidence from community forestry in Nepal. World Development, 29, 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. White, T. A., & Runge, C. F. (1995). The emergence and evolution of collective action: Lessons from watershed management in Haiti. World Development, 23, 1683–1698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Witt, U. (1998). Imagination and leadership: The neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35, 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siegwart Lindenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lindenberg, S. Sustainable cooperation needs tinkering with both rules and social motivation. J Bioecon 16, 71–81 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-013-9172-6

Download citation

Keywords

  • Transformational Leader
  • Internal Factor
  • Social Motivation
  • Common Pool Resource
  • Joint Production