The target article was written for a workshop that I organized with Lin Ostrom titled “Rules as Genotypes in Cultural Evolution”. In my commentary, I describe the background for the workshop and target article in addition to commenting on the article itself. A compelling case can be made for functionally organized human groups as like species that adapt to their local environments. A cultural inheritance mechanism is required for this to happen, which functions analogously to genetic inheritance, although the mechanistic details need not be analogous. Indeed, a diversity of cultural inheritance mechanisms are possible that need not be mechanistically analogous to each other. In addition, most modern human populations consist of a diversity of functionally organized groups, or cultural ecosystems. The distinction between “species” and “ecosystem” is important because the concept of an inheritance system applies primarily to the former. Finally, positive cultural evolution in modern large-scale society must be engineered and an explicitly evolutionary perspective will add value to the enterprise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Bird, A. (2002). DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes & development, 16(1), 6–21. doi:10.1101/gad.947102.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dethlefsen, L., McFall-Ngai, M., & Relman, D. A. (2007). An ecological and evolutionary perspective on human–microbe mutualism and disease. Nature, 449(7164), 811–818. doi:10.1038/nature06245.
Evans-Prichard, E. E. (1965). Theories of primitive religion. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goodnight, C. J. (1990a). Experimental studies of community evolution I: The response to selection at the community level. Evolution, 44, 1614–1624.
Goodnight, C. J. (1990b). Experimental studies of community evolution II: The ecological basis of the response to community selection. Evolution, 44, 1625–1636.
Holden, C., & Mace, M. (2009). Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of lactose digestion in adults. Human Biology, 81, 597–619.
Lewis, O. A., & Steinmo, S. (2012). How institutions evolve: Evolutionary theory and institutional change. Polity, 44(3), 314–339. doi:10.1057/pol.2012.10.
Lustick, I. S., Alcorn, B., Garces, M., & Ruvinsky, A. (2012). From theory to simulation: The dynamic political hierarchy in country virtualisation models. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 24(3), 279–299. doi:10.1080/0952813X.2012.693841.
Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134(3489), 1501–1506.
McGinnis, M. D. (1999). Polycentric governance and development: Readings from the workshop in political theory and policy analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Richerson, P. J., & Boyd, R. (2005). Not by genes alone: How culture transformed human evolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Sober, E., & Wilson, D. S. (1998). Unto others: The evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Steinmo, S. (2010). The evolution of modern states: Sweden, Japan, and the United States (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics) (p. 288). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Swenson, W., Arendt, J., & Wilson, D. S. (2000). Artificial selection of microbial ecosystems for 3-chloroaniline biodegradation. Environmental Microbiology, 2, 564–571.
Swenson, W., Wilson, D. S., & Elias, R. (2000). Artificial ecosystem selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97, 9110–9114.
Wilson, D. S. (2002). Darwin’s cathedral: Evolution, religion and the nature of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wilson, D. S. (2013). Human cultures are primarily adaptive at the group level (with comment). Cliodynamics: The Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical History, 4(1). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/05n4z9w8
Wilson, D. S., & Gowdy, J. M. (2013). Evolution as a general theoretical framework for economics and public policy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90(suppl.), S3–S10.
Wilson, D. S., Hayes, S. C., Biglan, A., & Embry, D. (2014). Evolving the future: Toward a science of intentional change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press).
Wilson, D. S., Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. (2013). Generalizing the design principles for improving the efficacy of groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 90(suppl.), S21–S32.
Wilson, D. S., & Wilson, E. O. (2007). Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Quarterly Review of Biology, 82, 327–348.
I join the many others who knew Lin in mourning her passing and I cherish the opportunity that I had to work with her for several years prior to her death. I thank my colleagues at the Evolution Institute for their role in making my collaborations with Lin possible.
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, D.S. Cultural species and their ecosystems. J Bioecon 16, 31–38 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-013-9170-8
- Cultural Evolution
- Evolutionary Perspective
- Human Group
- Proximate Mechanism
- Target Article