Journal of Bioeconomics

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 91–98 | Cite as

How far does evolution take us? Comment on Elinor Ostrom’s: do institutions for collective action evolve?

  • Amy R. PoteeteEmail author


Elinor Ostrom’s article in this issue suggests that institutions for collective action evolve, highlights parallels between biological and institutional evolution, and describes an hypothetical example of institutional evolution related to an irrigation system. The article is provocative but not definitive in that it does not demonstrate that evolution is more than a metaphor for institutional change and that institutions actually evolve. This commentary unpacks the concept of evolutionary change and evaluates how well various aspects of institutional change fit within this model of change. The analysis supports Ostrom’s contention that evolution is not just a metaphor for institutional change, but also suggests that not all institutional change can be classified as evolutionary. The commentary highlights the need for further conceptual and theoretical development to delineate various forms and processes of institutional change, distinguish between evolutionary and non-evolutionary change, and draw out the consequences of various forms of change.


Collective action Evolution Institutions Institutional change  Elinor Ostrom  

JEL Classifications

D710 Q200 



I gratefully acknowledge the support of Concordia University, Montreal, and the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of Canada.


  1. Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Immergut, E. M. (1998). The theoretical core of the new institutionalism. Politics and Society, 26(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lund, C. (2006). Twilight institutions: Public authority and local politics in Africa. Development and Change, 37(4), 685–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Migdal, J. S. (1988). Strong societies and weak states: State-society relations and state capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ostrom, E. (2013). Do institutions for collective action evolve? Journal of Bioeconomics. doi: 10.1007/s10818-013-9154-8
  9. Poteete, A. R. (2012). Levels, scales, linkages, and other ‘multiples’ affecting natural resources. International Journal of the Commons, 6(2 Aug), 134–150. Scholar
  10. Ribot, J. C., Chhatre, A., & Lankina, T. (2008). Introduction: Institutional choice and recognition in the formation and consolidation of local democracy. Conservation and Society, 6(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  11. Schmidt, V. A. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Steinmo, S. (2010). The evolution of modern states: Sweden, Japan, and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Thelen, K. (2010). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 208–240). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. von Benda-Beckmann, K. (1981). Forum shopping and shopping forums: Dispute processing in a Minangkabu village in West Sumatra. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 19, 117–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceConcordia UniversityMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations