Skip to main content
Log in

Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a public goods game

  • Published:
Journal of Bioeconomics

Abstract

We use data on response times from a public goods experiment to test the hypothesis that cooperation is instinctive, under the assumption that the longer the time of the decision, the less instinctive the choice. Results seem to support the hypothesis that cooperation is instinctive, while defection is ‘rational’. Moreover, as the experiment is designed also to assess the effects of the consumption of relational goods on cooperation, we are also able to state that some types of relational goods, like team working, produce additional cooperation, but make it less spontaneous. We also detect that females seem to behave less instinctively than males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bowles S., Gintis H. (2011) A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Brañas P., Cobo_Reyes R., Espinosa M. P., Jiménez-Jiménez N., Kovárik J., Ponti G. (2010) Altruism and social integration. Games and Economic Behavior 69(2): 249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown T. C., Kingsley D., Peterson G. L., Flores N. E., Clarke A., Birjulin A. (2008) Reliability of individual valuations of public and private goods: Choice consistency, response time, and preference refinement. Journal of Public Economics 92(7): 1595–1606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C. F. (2003) Behavioral game theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Canegallo C., Ortona G., Ottone S., Ponzano F. (2008) Competition versus cooperation: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Socio-Economics 37(1): 18–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter J. (2007) Punishing free-riders: How group size affects mutual monitoring and the provision of public goods. Games and Economic Behavior 60(1): 31–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri A., Graziano S., Maitra P. (2006) Social learning and norms in a public goods experiment with inter-generational advice. Review of Economic Studies 73(2): 357–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson R., Gneezy U. (2009) Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47(2): 448–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis D., Holt C. (1993) Experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckel C. C., Grossman P. J. (2001) Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry 39(2): 171–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gächter S. (2000) Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. The American Economic Review 90(4): 980–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr E., Gächter S. (2004) Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3): 159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard J. (1995) Public goods: a survey of experimental research. In: Kagel J., Roth A. (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 111–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewisch P. G., Ottone S., Ponzano F. (2011) Free-riding on altruistic punishment? An experimental comparison of third-party punishment in a stand-alone and in an in-group environment. Review of Law and Economics 7(1): 1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotito, G., Migheli, M., & Ortona, G. (2011). An experimental inquiry into the nature of relational goods. POLIS Working Paper 160. Institute of Public Policy and Public Choice POLIS.

  • Ottone S. (2008) Are people samaritans or avengers?. Economics Bulletin 3(10): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Ottone S., Ponzano F. (2010) Competition and cooperation in markets. The experimental case of a winner-take-all setting. Journal of Socio-Economics 39(2): 163–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piovesan M., Wengström E. (2009) Fast or fair? a study of response times. Economics Letters 105(2): 193–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A. (2007) Instinctive and cognitive reasoning: A study of response times. The Economic Journal 117(523): 1243–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein A. (2008) Comments on neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy 24: 485–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. F. H., & Sommerville, J. A. (2011). Fairness expectations and altruistic sharing in 15-month-old human infants. PloS ONE, 6(10), no indication of pages.

  • Selten R. (1978) The chain store paradox. Theory and Decision 9(2): 127–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1986) The economics of rights, cooperation and welfare. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden R. (1989) Spontaneous order. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 85–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witt U. (1986) Evolution and stability of cooperation without enforceable contracts. Kyklos 39(2): 245–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Migheli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lotito, G., Migheli, M. & Ortona, G. Is cooperation instinctive? Evidence from the response times in a public goods game. J Bioecon 15, 123–133 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9141-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-012-9141-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation